academic_integrity
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
Catatan perubahan
Riwayat pelacak: 0 catatan rilis.
Kesegaran dan status tinjauan catatan publik saat ini.
7 klaim saat ini; 5 sumber resmi.
Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbedaan rilis publik untuk Université de Montréal. Snapshot rilis individual tetap tersedia dari URL spesifik rilisnya.
Tidak ada pembaruan yang tercatat dalam riwayat pelacak ini.
Pelacak ini bukan nasihat hukum, bukan nasihat integritas akademik, dan bukan pernyataan resmi universitas kecuali sumber yang ditautkan merupakan halaman resmi universitas itu sendiri.
Klaim yang baru diekstrak adalah tambahan pada pelacak dan belum tentu baru diterbitkan oleh universitas. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hash untuk URL sumber yang sama dan dengan sendirinya bukan perubahan kebijakan.
Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbedaan rilis ini.
Hanya perbandingan tercatat dengan Claim ID yang cocok persis yang ditampilkan.
Tidak ada pembaruan yang tercatat dalam riwayat pelacak ini.
Riwayat pelacak: 0 catatan rilis.
Catatan klaim saat ini: 7.
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
UdeM Directive 10.70 tells administrative staff that confidentiality level 3 and 4 information must never be entered into a generative AI tool.
For UdeM graduate directed work, master's theses, doctoral essays, and dissertations, the graduate-studies guidance says generative AI use in research and writing must be transparent, and non-transparent use could be considered a disciplinary offence.
UdeM's graduate-studies guidance says graduate students working with human-participant research data must not submit personal or identifying participant information, or information that could identify an individual or group, to generative AI tools.
For administrative staff, UdeM Directive 10.70 says generative AI use should be disclosed, and use in a decision-making process should be disclosed to affected persons with consent obtained before use.
UdeM's TI page for administrative staff says some generative AI tools are permitted if Directive 10.70 principles are respected, but identifies READ.AI and DeepSeek as proscribed tools.
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance cautions teaching staff that AI-generated-content detection tools can vary in reliability and their results should be considered carefully.
Catatan sumber resmi: 5.
official_policy_page Pelacak diperiksa pada May 15, 2026, 4:02 AM
official_guidance Pelacak diperiksa pada May 15, 2026, 4:04 AM
official_guidance Pelacak diperiksa pada May 15, 2026, 4:04 AM
official_pdf Pelacak diperiksa pada May 15, 2026, 4:04 AM
official_guidance Pelacak diperiksa pada May 15, 2026, 4:04 AM