academic_integrity
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
Ændringslog
Tracker-historik: 0 udgivelsesposter.
Aktualitet og gennemgangsstatus for den nuværende offentlige registrering.
7 aktuelle påstande; 5 officielle kilder.
Denne side kombinerer alle offentlige udgivelsesforskelle for Université de Montréal. Individuelle udgivelsesøjebliksbilleder forbliver tilgængelige fra deres udgivelsesspecifikke URL'er.
Der er ingen registrerede opdateringer i denne sporers historik.
Denne tracker er ikke juridisk rådgivning, ikke rådgivning om akademisk integritet og ikke en officiel udtalelse fra universitetet, medmindre en tilknyttet kilde er universitetets egen officielle side.
Nyligt udtrukne påstande er tilføjelser til trackeren og er ikke nødvendigvis nyligt offentliggjort af universitetet. Ændringer i kildesnapshots viser hashændringer for samme kilde-URL og er i sig selv ikke politikændringer.
Semantisk klassificering af ændringerne i denne udgivelse.
Kun registrerede sammenligninger med et nøjagtigt Claim ID-match vises.
Der er ingen registrerede opdateringer i denne sporers historik.
Tracker-historik: 0 udgivelsesposter.
Aktuelle påstandsposter: 7.
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
UdeM Directive 10.70 tells administrative staff that confidentiality level 3 and 4 information must never be entered into a generative AI tool.
For UdeM graduate directed work, master's theses, doctoral essays, and dissertations, the graduate-studies guidance says generative AI use in research and writing must be transparent, and non-transparent use could be considered a disciplinary offence.
UdeM's graduate-studies guidance says graduate students working with human-participant research data must not submit personal or identifying participant information, or information that could identify an individual or group, to generative AI tools.
For administrative staff, UdeM Directive 10.70 says generative AI use should be disclosed, and use in a decision-making process should be disclosed to affected persons with consent obtained before use.
UdeM's TI page for administrative staff says some generative AI tools are permitted if Directive 10.70 principles are respected, but identifies READ.AI and DeepSeek as proscribed tools.
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance cautions teaching staff that AI-generated-content detection tools can vary in reliability and their results should be considered carefully.
Officielle kildeoptegnelser: 5.
official_policy_page Tracker kontrolleret den May 15, 2026, 4:02 AM
official_guidance Tracker kontrolleret den May 15, 2026, 4:04 AM
official_guidance Tracker kontrolleret den May 15, 2026, 4:04 AM
official_pdf Tracker kontrolleret den May 15, 2026, 4:04 AM
official_guidance Tracker kontrolleret den May 15, 2026, 4:04 AM