Montreal, Canada

Université de Montréal

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage7 reviewedEvidence-backed claims7Reviewed7Candidate0Official sources5Source languagefrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universite-de-montreal.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Academic integrity

Université de Montréal has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

Université de Montréal has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence76%Evidence1Sources1

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: course_plans_explicit_ai_authorization_required_for_permission

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Les plans de cours doivent indiquer explicitement lorsque l’utilisation de tels outils est permise ; sans autorisation explicite, ces outils sont réputés interdits.

Localized display only

Course plans should explicitly state when these tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, they are deemed prohibited.

Privacy

UdeM Directive 10.70 tells administrative staff that confidentiality level 3 and 4 information must never be entered into a generative AI tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: administrative_staff_no_confidential_level_3_4_into_genai

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Les informations de niveaux de confidentialité 3 et 4 « Information confidentielle ou hautement confidentielle à risque élevé, critique ou majeur » ne doivent en aucun cas être saisies dans un outil d’IA générative;

Localized display only

Confidentiality level 3 and 4 information must not be entered into a generative AI tool.

Research

For UdeM graduate directed work, master's theses, doctoral essays, and dissertations, the graduate-studies guidance says generative AI use in research and writing must be transparent, and non-transparent use could be considered a disciplinary offence.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: graduate_thesis_directed_work_transparent_authorized_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
l’utilisation d’outils d’IA générative dans le processus de recherche et de rédaction des travaux dirigés, des mémoires de maitrise, des essais doctoraux et des thèses de doctorat doit toujours se faire en toute transparence. ... L'utilisation non transparente d'outils d'IA générative pourrait être considérée comme une infraction au règlement disciplinaire

Localized display only

For graduate directed work, theses, doctoral essays, and dissertations, generative AI use in research and writing must be transparent; non-transparent use could be treated as a disciplinary offence.

Privacy

UdeM's graduate-studies guidance says graduate students working with human-participant research data must not submit personal or identifying participant information, or information that could identify an individual or group, to generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: graduate_research_no_identifying_human_participant_data_to_genai

Original evidence

Evidence 1
la personne étudiante travaillant avec des données provenant de participants humains à une recherche ne doit soumettre aucune information personnelle ou d'identification sur les participantes et participants, ni aucune information qui pourrait être utilisée pour identifier un individu ou un groupe à des outils d'IA générative.

Localized display only

A student working with human-participant research data must not submit personal or identifying information, or information that could identify an individual or group, to generative AI tools.

Security Review

UdeM's TI page for administrative staff says some generative AI tools are permitted if Directive 10.70 principles are respected, but identifies READ.AI and DeepSeek as proscribed tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: administrative_staff_readai_deepseek_proscribed

Original evidence

Evidence 1
L’utilisation de certains outils d’IA générative est permise dans la mesure où les principes énoncés dans la Directive pour l’utilisation de l’intelligence artificielle (IA) générative (10.70) sont respectés. ... L’utilisation des outils d’IA générative suivants est proscrite. READ.AI ... DeepSeek

Localized display only

Some generative AI tools are permitted if Directive 10.70 is respected; READ.AI and DeepSeek are listed as proscribed.

Teaching

UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance cautions teaching staff that AI-generated-content detection tools can vary in reliability and their results should be considered carefully.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: ai_detection_results_variable_reliability_teaching_context

Original evidence

Evidence 1
la fiabilité des outils de détection de contenu produit par l’IAg peut être variable, ce qui oblige à considérer avec beaucoup de prudence leurs résultats.

Localized display only

The reliability of tools that detect AI-generated content can vary, so their results should be considered with caution.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities