academic_integrity
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
Dziennik zmian
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Aktualna świeżość publicznych rekordów i stan weryfikacji.
Université de Montréal currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 15 maj 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Ta strona łączy wszystkie publiczne diffy wydań dla Université de Montréal. Indywidualne migawki wersji pozostają dostępne pod adresami URL specyficznymi dla danej wersji.
Dla tej uczelni nie zarejestrowano jeszcze różnic między kolejnymi wydaniami. Strona nadal śledzi bieżące twierdzenia poparte źródłami, oficjalne przypisania źródeł, stan przeglądu, aktualność źródeł oraz publicznie dostępny JSON na potrzeby wyszukiwania i cytowania.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła pokazują zmiany sum kontrolnych dla tego samego URL źródłowego i same w sobie nie stanowią zmian polityki.
Klasyfikacja semantyczna dla tej różnicy wersji.
Zjednoczona różnica trackerów wygenerowana ze wszystkich publicznych migawek wydań dla tej uczelni.
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
0 public release diffs
7 Twierdzenie rekordów
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
UdeM Directive 10.70 tells administrative staff that confidentiality level 3 and 4 information must never be entered into a generative AI tool.
For UdeM graduate directed work, master's theses, doctoral essays, and dissertations, the graduate-studies guidance says generative AI use in research and writing must be transparent, and non-transparent use could be considered a disciplinary offence.
UdeM's graduate-studies guidance says graduate students working with human-participant research data must not submit personal or identifying participant information, or information that could identify an individual or group, to generative AI tools.
For administrative staff, UdeM Directive 10.70 says generative AI use should be disclosed, and use in a decision-making process should be disclosed to affected persons with consent obtained before use.
UdeM's TI page for administrative staff says some generative AI tools are permitted if Directive 10.70 principles are respected, but identifies READ.AI and DeepSeek as proscribed tools.
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance cautions teaching staff that AI-generated-content detection tools can vary in reliability and their results should be considered carefully.
5 source attributions
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 15 maj 2026, 04:02
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 maj 2026, 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 maj 2026, 04:04
official_pdf Tracker checked at 15 maj 2026, 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 maj 2026, 04:04