academic_integrity
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
变更日志
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Université de Montréal currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月15日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Université de Montréal。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
0 public release diffs
7 声明 条记录
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
UdeM Directive 10.70 tells administrative staff that confidentiality level 3 and 4 information must never be entered into a generative AI tool.
For UdeM graduate directed work, master's theses, doctoral essays, and dissertations, the graduate-studies guidance says generative AI use in research and writing must be transparent, and non-transparent use could be considered a disciplinary offence.
UdeM's graduate-studies guidance says graduate students working with human-participant research data must not submit personal or identifying participant information, or information that could identify an individual or group, to generative AI tools.
For administrative staff, UdeM Directive 10.70 says generative AI use should be disclosed, and use in a decision-making process should be disclosed to affected persons with consent obtained before use.
UdeM's TI page for administrative staff says some generative AI tools are permitted if Directive 10.70 principles are respected, but identifies READ.AI and DeepSeek as proscribed tools.
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance cautions teaching staff that AI-generated-content detection tools can vary in reliability and their results should be considered carefully.
5 source attributions
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:02
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_pdf Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04