academic_integrity
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
Registro de cambios
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.
Université de Montréal currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 15 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Université de Montréal. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.
Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.
Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
0 public release diffs
7 Afirmación registros
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.
UdeM Directive 10.70 tells administrative staff that confidentiality level 3 and 4 information must never be entered into a generative AI tool.
For UdeM graduate directed work, master's theses, doctoral essays, and dissertations, the graduate-studies guidance says generative AI use in research and writing must be transparent, and non-transparent use could be considered a disciplinary offence.
UdeM's graduate-studies guidance says graduate students working with human-participant research data must not submit personal or identifying participant information, or information that could identify an individual or group, to generative AI tools.
For administrative staff, UdeM Directive 10.70 says generative AI use should be disclosed, and use in a decision-making process should be disclosed to affected persons with consent obtained before use.
UdeM's TI page for administrative staff says some generative AI tools are permitted if Directive 10.70 principles are respected, but identifies READ.AI and DeepSeek as proscribed tools.
UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance cautions teaching staff that AI-generated-content detection tools can vary in reliability and their results should be considered carefully.
5 source attributions
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 15 may 2026, 4:02
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 may 2026, 4:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 may 2026, 4:04
official_pdf Tracker checked at 15 may 2026, 4:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 may 2026, 4:04