University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPLES

Munich, Germany

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

ClasificaciónQS World University Rankings 2026: =58Updated19 jul 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

7 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Valor normalizado: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Microsoft Copilot through the LMU Microsoft 365 access for employees.","howToObtain":"LMU employees activate an LMU Microsoft account and use the University M365 access.","costToUser":"Included in the applicable LMU M365 licence; no separate price specified.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Última verificación
15 jul 2026
Último cambio
15 jul 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
LMU's official teaching event states that LMU employees can use Microsoft Copilot through the University Microsoft 365 access.

Vista localizada only

LMU's official teaching event states that LMU employees can use Microsoft Copilot through the University Microsoft 365 access.

Idioma de la fuente
de
Hash de instantánea
1cc3e1b5…
Recuperado
15 jul 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 2
LMU IT says employees receive Microsoft 365 licences through the LMU campus contract and can activate their LMU Microsoft account to sign into licensed programs and services.

Vista localizada only

LMU IT says employees receive Microsoft 365 licences through the LMU campus contract and can activate their LMU Microsoft account to sign into licensed programs and services.

Idioma de la fuente
de
Hash de instantánea
1cc3e1b5…
Recuperado
15 jul 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%

Valor normalizado: Assessment AI use requires explicit teacher permission in the IfKW guidance

Última verificación
12 may 2026
Último cambio
12 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Therefore, in general terms, the use of AI may be allowed in assessments only with the explicit permission of the teacher. If no explicit permission is given, then the students must assume the use of AI is not allowed.

Vista localizada only

IfKW assessment guidance requires explicit teacher permission for AI use.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
a82c2400…
Recuperado
12 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: Whether use of AI is permitted for assessed work

Privacidad

LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%

Valor normalizado: Personal information requires consent and German/EU data-protection compliance before AI upload

Última verificación
12 may 2026
Último cambio
12 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU standards of data protection are met. Providers of LLMs may reside in countries where rules of data protection do not follow the same standards as in Germany or the EU.

Vista localizada only

IfKW guidance restricts uploading personal information to AI systems without consent and data-protection compliance.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
a82c2400…
Recuperado
12 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: The uploading of material to AI systems

Academic Integrity

LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Valor normalizado: Unattributed AI-generated text is treated as plagiarism in the IfKW guidance

Última verificación
12 may 2026
Último cambio
12 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
To include AI-generated text verbatim — or with small changes — into one’s texts without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism comparable to the use of text written by others without citing the source. If it can be established that a student has submitted work that includes a significant amount AI-generated text without proper attribution (see below), the corresponding assessment will be evaluated with the grade 5 (failed).

Vista localizada only

IfKW guidance treats unattributed AI-generated text as plagiarism and says significant cases can fail.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
a82c2400…
Recuperado
12 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: The use of AI as (comparable to) plagiarism

Investigación

LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Valor normalizado: Medical Faculty GWP page requires disclosure and marking of AI use in dissertations

Última verificación
12 may 2026
Último cambio
12 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Geben Sie an, wann, wo und in welchem Umfang Sie KI im Rahmen Ihrer Dissertation genutzt haben! In Ihrer eidesstattlichen Versicherung (Affidavit) erklären Sie, dass Sie Ihre Dissertation selbständig verfasst haben und alle verwendeten Hilfsmittel benannt haben. KI ist ein solches Hilfsmittel und muss daher benannt werden. Machen Sie Abschnitte in denen Sie KI beim Erstellen oder Editieren genutzt haben kenntlich.

Vista localizada only

Medical Faculty GWP guidance requires disclosure of AI use in dissertations.

Idioma de la fuente
de
Hash de instantánea
99c44e19…
Recuperado
12 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: Umgang und Nutzung von künstlicher Intelligenz

Academic Integrity

LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Valor normalizado: Permitted AI use must be documented in assessed work under IfKW guidance

Última verificación
12 may 2026
Último cambio
12 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
The use of AI (if permitted) in assessed work, including for preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented. In addition, students should document: How the tool was used in their work (e.g., generation of stimuli, translation, summary of previous research, formulation of research questions etc), the prompt, and if required by the teacher, the original output.

Vista localizada only

IfKW guidance requires documentation of permitted AI use, including tool use and prompts.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
a82c2400…
Recuperado
12 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: The attribution of the use of AI

Enseñanza

LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Valor normalizado: Teaching handout recommends adapting e-exam question formats around ChatGPT limitations

Última verificación
12 may 2026
Último cambio
12 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Bei E-Klausuren gelten folgende Empfehlungen: Stellen Sie andere Aufgaben als vor der Einführung von ChatGPT. Sie müssen davon ausgehen, dass ChatGPT zum Einsatz kommen könnte. Es wäre deshalb sinnvoll, dass Sie Aufgaben stellen, bei denen Studierende die Limitationen von ChatGPT kritisch reflektieren müssen. Einfache Wissens- und Verständnisfragen sind unter Einsatz von KI nicht sinnvoll.

Vista localizada only

LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions and avoiding simple knowledge questions when AI may be used.

Idioma de la fuente
de
Hash de instantánea
e572e056…
Recuperado
12 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Kapitel 5.4 Umgang mit ChatGPT bei E-Klausuren

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza97%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/ludwig-maximilians-universitat-munchen

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios