ai_tool_treatment
LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.
3+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): Therefore, in general terms, the use of AI may be allowed in assessments only with the explicit permission of the teacher. If no explicit permission is given, then the students must assume the use of AI is not allowed.
4+privacy: LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.
5+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): Material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU standards of data protection are met. Providers of LLMs may reside in countries where rules of data protection do not follow the same standards as in Germany or the EU.
6+academic_integrity: LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).
7+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): To include AI-generated text verbatim — or with small changes — into one’s texts without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism comparable to the use of text written by others without citing the source. If it can be established that a student has submitted work that includes a significant amount AI-generated text without proper attribution (see below), the corresponding assessment will be evaluated with the grade 5 (failed).
8+research: LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.
9+Evidence (de, 99c44e197380): Geben Sie an, wann, wo und in welchem Umfang Sie KI im Rahmen Ihrer Dissertation genutzt haben! In Ihrer eidesstattlichen Versicherung (Affidavit) erklären Sie, dass Sie Ihre Dissertation selbständig verfasst haben und alle verwendeten Hilfsmittel benannt haben. KI ist ein solches Hilfsmittel und muss daher benannt werden. Machen Sie Abschnitte in denen Sie KI beim Erstellen oder Editieren genutzt haben kenntlich.
10+academic_integrity: LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.
11+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): The use of AI (if permitted) in assessed work, including for preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented. In addition, students should document: How the tool was used in their work (e.g., generation of stimuli, translation, summary of previous research, formulation of research questions etc), the prompt, and if required by the teacher, the original output.
12+teaching: LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.
13+Evidence (de, e572e056a5eb): Bei E-Klausuren gelten folgende Empfehlungen: Stellen Sie andere Aufgaben als vor der Einführung von ChatGPT. Sie müssen davon ausgehen, dass ChatGPT zum Einsatz kommen könnte. Es wäre deshalb sinnvoll, dass Sie Aufgaben stellen, bei denen Studierende die Limitationen von ChatGPT kritisch reflektieren müssen. Einfache Wissens- und Verständnisfragen sind unter Einsatz von KI nicht sinnvoll.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
6 claim records
privacy
LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).
Review: Agent reviewed
research
LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
Handreichung zum Umgang mit KI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:09 PM
The use of AI by students
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:09 PM
Umgang und Nutzung von künstlicher Intelligenz
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:09 PM