ai_tool_treatment
LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
6 claim records
LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.
LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.
LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).
LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.
LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.
LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.
3 source attributions
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026