Change log

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.
3+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): Therefore, in general terms, the use of AI may be allowed in assessments only with the explicit permission of the teacher. If no explicit permission is given, then the students must assume the use of AI is not allowed.
4+privacy: LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.
5+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): Material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU standards of data protection are met. Providers of LLMs may reside in countries where rules of data protection do not follow the same standards as in Germany or the EU.
6+academic_integrity: LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).
7+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): To include AI-generated text verbatim — or with small changes — into one’s texts without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism comparable to the use of text written by others without citing the source. If it can be established that a student has submitted work that includes a significant amount AI-generated text without proper attribution (see below), the corresponding assessment will be evaluated with the grade 5 (failed).
8+research: LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.
9+Evidence (de, 99c44e197380): Geben Sie an, wann, wo und in welchem Umfang Sie KI im Rahmen Ihrer Dissertation genutzt haben! In Ihrer eidesstattlichen Versicherung (Affidavit) erklären Sie, dass Sie Ihre Dissertation selbständig verfasst haben und alle verwendeten Hilfsmittel benannt haben. KI ist ein solches Hilfsmittel und muss daher benannt werden. Machen Sie Abschnitte in denen Sie KI beim Erstellen oder Editieren genutzt haben kenntlich.
10+academic_integrity: LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.
11+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): The use of AI (if permitted) in assessed work, including for preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented. In addition, students should document: How the tool was used in their work (e.g., generation of stimuli, translation, summary of previous research, formulation of research questions etc), the prompt, and if required by the teacher, the original output.
12+teaching: LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.
13+Evidence (de, e572e056a5eb): Bei E-Klausuren gelten folgende Empfehlungen: Stellen Sie andere Aufgaben als vor der Einführung von ChatGPT. Sie müssen davon ausgehen, dass ChatGPT zum Einsatz kommen könnte. Es wäre deshalb sinnvoll, dass Sie Aufgaben stellen, bei denen Studierende die Limitationen von ChatGPT kritisch reflektieren müssen. Einfache Wissens- und Verständnisfragen sind unter Einsatz von KI nicht sinnvoll.

Claim changes

6 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

3 source attributions