Durham, United Kingdom

Durham University

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

16 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

For Common Awards summative assessments, Durham guidance says students must not use generative AI to create substantive content that they present as their own creation.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza99%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
You must not use generative AI to create substantive content for your assessed work that you then present as if it were your own creation.

Source Status

Durham Common Awards AI academic-misconduct policy is scoped to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza98%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
It applies to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules. Its only purpose is to define which uses of generative AI count as academic misconduct in that context.

Academic Integrity

For Common Awards students, Durham guidance says students must not provide generative AI with others' material unless it is public-domain material, permitted material, or protected from training use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza98%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
You must not provide a generative AI with any text or other material produced by others, unless that material is in the public domain, or you have explicit permission to do so, or you have confirmation that the content will not be used to train the AI in question.

Academic Integrity

The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
The policy requires students to copy and paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submitting them.

Ai Tool Treatment

Durham Global Opportunities guidance says using generative AI in Global Opportunities applications is unadvisable and may negatively affect an application.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
It is unadvisable to use generative AI and it may negatively affect your application.

Ai Tool Treatment

Durham Common Awards guidance says some limited uses of generative AI do not count as academic misconduct if work remains the student's own, AI use is acknowledged where required, and caution is demonstrated.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
In general, however, other limited uses of generative AI to facilitate your work do not count as academic misconduct, provided that the resulting work still reflects your own engagement with your sources, your own understanding, and your own reasoning and judgments; you clearly acknowledge any use of AI that has substantially informed the content or presentation of your work; and you demonstrate appropriate caution about the limitations of the tools you use.

Enseñanza

Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
All programmes will make use of a range of assessments clearly identified as either: No GenAI Allowed (including some assessments where AI use is not possible, such as viva); Selective, where it will be specified how GenAI may be used; Allowed, where students may choose whether and how to use GenAI; Embedded, where using GenAI is required.

Ai Tool Treatment

Durham Global Opportunities guidance says asking an AI tool to proofread in British English would be appropriate where the original text was generated by the human applicant.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Asking an AI tool to 'proof read in British English' would be appropriate use (just as asking a friend or relative to proof read would be) as the original 'generation' of the text was by the human applicant.

Source Status

Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
An update to our GenAI policy was approved by our academic governing body Senate in June 2026.

Source Status

Durham's public DCAD generative-AI resources page lists an internal Institutional Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Learning, Teaching and Assessment dated June 2025.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Institutional Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Learning, Teaching and Assessment, June 2025

Enseñanza

DCAD assessment guidance says marking criteria should be reviewed alongside assessment redesign in light of generative AI.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
It is also evident that, whether learning outcomes change significantly or not, marking criteria should be reviewed alongside the assessment redesign process.

Enseñanza

DCAD assessment guidance says actively addressing generative AI in assessment briefs can promote open dialogue with students and help assessments reflect programme learning outcomes and disciplinary practices.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Actively addressing genAI, whether implicitly (by designing assessments that focus on human abilities and development) or explicitly (by including genAI in assessment briefs), helps to promote open dialogue about these tools with students and to ensure that assessments reflect programme learning outcomes and disciplinary practices.

Enseñanza

Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Programmes are being updated to ensure that students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.

Enseñanza

DCAD assessment guidance says starting an iterative programme-level discussion about learning outcomes and generative AI is highly recommended rather than ignoring already occurring shifts.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
However, starting this discussion as an iterative process amidst uncertainty is highly recommended versus ignoring the many shifts that have already occurred.

Ai Tool Treatment

Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
our staff can choose whether and how to use GenAI, being open and transparent about this. They must operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.

Investigación

Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Senate also approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees.

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza99%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Durham University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 7, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/durham-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios