{"apiVersion":"v1","generatedAt":"2026-05-14T05:23:47.996Z","canonicalUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/durham-university","license":"CC-BY-4.0","trackerMetadataLicense":"CC-BY-4.0","sourcePolicy":"Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.","sourceRightsPolicy":"Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.","limitations":["Policy analysis profiles are deterministic summaries of public tracker claims and are not final policy conclusions.","Policy Coverage Score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage; it is not a policy quality score, strictness score, legal adequacy score, safety score, or institutional compliance score.","This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page."],"citation":{"citationTitle":"Durham University policy analysis profile","canonicalUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/durham-university","publicJsonUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/analysis/universities/durham-university.json","suggestedCitation":"University AI Policy Tracker. \"Durham University policy analysis profile.\" Version v1. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/durham-university","sourceRightsPolicy":"Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms."},"data":{"schemaVersion":"uapt-policy-analysis-v1","apiVersion":"v1","entityType":"university","entitySlug":"durham-university","entityName":"Durham University","canonicalUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/durham-university","publicJsonUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/analysis/universities/durham-university.json","generatedAt":"2026-05-14T02:12:31.000Z","basedOnClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-scope","claim-du-dcad-addressing-genai-in-assessments","claim-du-dcad-assessment-marking-criteria-review","claim-du-dcad-assessment-programme-level-discussion","claim-du-dcad-internal-institutional-policy-listed","claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","claim-du-go-proofreading-appropriate"],"basedOnSourceUrls":["https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/","https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2025/08/27/assessment-and-marking-in-light-of-generative-ai/","https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.821,"coverageScore":{"score":85,"maxScore":100,"label":"broad_public_coverage","components":[{"key":"policy_presence","label":"Central AI policy or guidance source exists","points":15,"maxPoints":15,"status":"unclear","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-scope","claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"academic_integrity","label":"Academic integrity guidance","points":15,"maxPoints":15,"status":"restricted","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-scope","claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"ai_disclosure","label":"AI disclosure guidance","points":15,"maxPoints":15,"status":"required","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"coursework","label":"Coursework guidance","points":10,"maxPoints":10,"status":"restricted","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-scope","claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"exams","label":"Exam or assessment guidance","points":10,"maxPoints":10,"status":"restricted","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"privacy_data_entry","label":"Privacy or data-entry guidance","points":0,"maxPoints":15,"status":"not_mentioned","evidenceClaimIds":[],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"approved_tools","label":"Approved tools, procurement, or licensed tools","points":10,"maxPoints":10,"status":"required","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","claim-du-go-proofreading-appropriate","claim-du-dcad-internal-institutional-policy-listed"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"teaching_guidance","label":"Teaching or research guidance","points":10,"maxPoints":10,"status":"recommended","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-dcad-addressing-genai-in-assessments","claim-du-dcad-assessment-marking-criteria-review","claim-du-dcad-internal-institutional-policy-listed","claim-du-dcad-assessment-programme-level-discussion"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"}],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","limitations":["Policy Coverage Score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage; it is not a policy quality score.","This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page."]},"dimensions":[{"key":"policy_presence","label":"Policy presence","status":"unclear","normalizedValue":"public_policy_or_guidance_source_present:unclear","summary":"Durham University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.","explanation":"Whether the public record contains official AI policy or guidance sources. This unclear status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 5 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-scope","claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.831,"evidenceCount":5,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"You must not use generative AI to create substantive content for your assessed work that you then present as if it were your own creation.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"You must not provide a generative AI with any text or other material produced by others, unless that material is in the public domain, or you have explicit permission to do so, or you have confirmation that the content will not be used to train the AI in question.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-scope","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It applies to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules. Its only purpose is to define which uses of generative AI count as academic misconduct in that context.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"The policy requires students to copy and paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submitting them.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It is unadvisable to use generative AI and it may negatively affect your application.","sourceSnapshotHash":"ba5fed62f973242d6badd63c3179a12ddf500109aa5f7ecc8c5e234c7fb5b787","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"ai_disclosure","label":"AI disclosure","status":"required","normalizedValue":"ai_use_disclosure_or_acknowledgement_addressed:required","summary":"Durham University has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses disclosure, acknowledgement, citation, or declaration of AI use. This required status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 2 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.82,"evidenceCount":2,"sourceCount":1,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"The policy requires students to copy and paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submitting them.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"In general, however, other limited uses of generative AI to facilitate your work do not count as academic misconduct, provided that the resulting work still reflects your own engagement with your sources, your own understanding, and your own reasoning and judgments; you clearly acknowledge any use of AI that has substantially informed the content or presentation of your work; and you demonstrate appropriate caution about the limitations of the tools you use.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"coursework","label":"Coursework","status":"restricted","normalizedValue":"course_or_assignment_dependent:restricted","summary":"Durham University has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses coursework, assignments, syllabi, papers, homework, or submitted work. This restricted status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 5 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-scope","claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.831,"evidenceCount":5,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"You must not use generative AI to create substantive content for your assessed work that you then present as if it were your own creation.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"You must not provide a generative AI with any text or other material produced by others, unless that material is in the public domain, or you have explicit permission to do so, or you have confirmation that the content will not be used to train the AI in question.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-scope","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It applies to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules. Its only purpose is to define which uses of generative AI count as academic misconduct in that context.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"The policy requires students to copy and paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submitting them.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It is unadvisable to use generative AI and it may negatively affect your application.","sourceSnapshotHash":"ba5fed62f973242d6badd63c3179a12ddf500109aa5f7ecc8c5e234c7fb5b787","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"exams","label":"Exams","status":"restricted","normalizedValue":"exam_or_assessment_ai_use_addressed:restricted","summary":"Durham University has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions. This restricted status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 5 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.828,"evidenceCount":5,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"You must not use generative AI to create substantive content for your assessed work that you then present as if it were your own creation.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"You must not provide a generative AI with any text or other material produced by others, unless that material is in the public domain, or you have explicit permission to do so, or you have confirmation that the content will not be used to train the AI in question.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"The policy requires students to copy and paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submitting them.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It is unadvisable to use generative AI and it may negatively affect your application.","sourceSnapshotHash":"ba5fed62f973242d6badd63c3179a12ddf500109aa5f7ecc8c5e234c7fb5b787","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"In general, however, other limited uses of generative AI to facilitate your work do not count as academic misconduct, provided that the resulting work still reflects your own engagement with your sources, your own understanding, and your own reasoning and judgments; you clearly acknowledge any use of AI that has substantially informed the content or presentation of your work; and you demonstrate appropriate caution about the limitations of the tools you use.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"privacy_data_entry","label":"Privacy and data entry","status":"not_mentioned","summary":"No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.","explanation":"This is an absence-of-evidence marker for the current tracker profile, not proof that no such policy exists.","evidenceClaimIds":[],"evidenceSourceUrls":[],"sourceLanguages":[],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0,"evidenceCount":0,"sourceCount":0,"notMentionedReason":"The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.","basis":[]},{"key":"academic_integrity","label":"Academic integrity","status":"restricted","normalizedValue":"ai_use_subject_to_academic_integrity_rules:restricted","summary":"Durham University has 5 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.","explanation":"Whether public guidance connects AI use to academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules. This restricted status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 5 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","claim-du-common-awards-scope","claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.83,"evidenceCount":5,"sourceCount":1,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-no-substantive-ai","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"You must not use generative AI to create substantive content for your assessed work that you then present as if it were your own creation.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-no-third-party-material","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"You must not provide a generative AI with any text or other material produced by others, unless that material is in the public domain, or you have explicit permission to do so, or you have confirmation that the content will not be used to train the AI in question.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-scope","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It applies to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules. Its only purpose is to define which uses of generative AI count as academic misconduct in that context.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-ai-declaration","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"The policy requires students to copy and paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submitting them.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"In general, however, other limited uses of generative AI to facilitate your work do not count as academic misconduct, provided that the resulting work still reflects your own engagement with your sources, your own understanding, and your own reasoning and judgments; you clearly acknowledge any use of AI that has substantially informed the content or presentation of your work; and you demonstrate appropriate caution about the limitations of the tools you use.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"approved_tools","label":"Approved tools","status":"required","normalizedValue":"approved_or_licensed_ai_tools_identified:required","summary":"Durham University has 4 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.","explanation":"Whether public guidance identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools. This required status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 4 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","claim-du-go-proofreading-appropriate","claim-du-dcad-internal-institutional-policy-listed"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/","https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.812,"evidenceCount":4,"sourceCount":3,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It is unadvisable to use generative AI and it may negatively affect your application.","sourceSnapshotHash":"ba5fed62f973242d6badd63c3179a12ddf500109aa5f7ecc8c5e234c7fb5b787","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"In general, however, other limited uses of generative AI to facilitate your work do not count as academic misconduct, provided that the resulting work still reflects your own engagement with your sources, your own understanding, and your own reasoning and judgments; you clearly acknowledge any use of AI that has substantially informed the content or presentation of your work; and you demonstrate appropriate caution about the limitations of the tools you use.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-go-proofreading-appropriate","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"Asking an AI tool to 'proof read in British English' would be appropriate use (just as asking a friend or relative to proof read would be) as the original 'generation' of the text was by the human applicant.","sourceSnapshotHash":"ba5fed62f973242d6badd63c3179a12ddf500109aa5f7ecc8c5e234c7fb5b787","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-dcad-internal-institutional-policy-listed","sourceUrl":"https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"Institutional Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Learning, Teaching and Assessment, June 2025","sourceSnapshotHash":"221e2a570ee0f05193c1c10adf79de564f2d41ecbc1b47022911bc621811ff5b","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"named_ai_services","label":"Named AI services","status":"required","normalizedValue":"named_ai_services_present:required","summary":"Durham University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.","explanation":"Whether public guidance names AI services such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini, Grammarly, or DeepSeek. This required status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 3 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","claim-du-go-proofreading-appropriate"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.816,"evidenceCount":3,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-du-go-ai-unadvisable","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It is unadvisable to use generative AI and it may negatively affect your application.","sourceSnapshotHash":"ba5fed62f973242d6badd63c3179a12ddf500109aa5f7ecc8c5e234c7fb5b787","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-common-awards-limited-uses-not-misconduct","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/common-awards/policies-processes/assessment/academic-misconductai-policy-and-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"In general, however, other limited uses of generative AI to facilitate your work do not count as academic misconduct, provided that the resulting work still reflects your own engagement with your sources, your own understanding, and your own reasoning and judgments; you clearly acknowledge any use of AI that has substantially informed the content or presentation of your work; and you demonstrate appropriate caution about the limitations of the tools you use.","sourceSnapshotHash":"6bd5492147814398f3b03f2c6582dec73f9e4fcc5f8c2d65bc374eb8a2489432","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-go-proofreading-appropriate","sourceUrl":"https://www.durham.ac.uk/global-durham/global-opportunities/ai-guidance/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"Asking an AI tool to 'proof read in British English' would be appropriate use (just as asking a friend or relative to proof read would be) as the original 'generation' of the text was by the human applicant.","sourceSnapshotHash":"ba5fed62f973242d6badd63c3179a12ddf500109aa5f7ecc8c5e234c7fb5b787","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"teaching_guidance","label":"Teaching guidance","status":"recommended","normalizedValue":"instructor_or_teaching_guidance_available:recommended","summary":"Durham University has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses instructors, teaching, classroom policy, assessment design, or syllabus language. This recommended status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 4 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-du-dcad-addressing-genai-in-assessments","claim-du-dcad-assessment-marking-criteria-review","claim-du-dcad-internal-institutional-policy-listed","claim-du-dcad-assessment-programme-level-discussion"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/","https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2025/08/27/assessment-and-marking-in-light-of-generative-ai/"],"sourceLanguages":["en-GB"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.797,"evidenceCount":4,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-du-dcad-addressing-genai-in-assessments","sourceUrl":"https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2025/08/27/assessment-and-marking-in-light-of-generative-ai/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"Actively addressing genAI, whether implicitly (by designing assessments that focus on human abilities and development) or explicitly (by including genAI in assessment briefs), helps to promote open dialogue about these tools with students and to ensure that assessments reflect programme learning outcomes and disciplinary practices.","sourceSnapshotHash":"1389b66974862e4fff2fea15285fd78f4603e27555e1ee323e9b762ed57e3301","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-dcad-assessment-marking-criteria-review","sourceUrl":"https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2025/08/27/assessment-and-marking-in-light-of-generative-ai/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"It is also evident that, whether learning outcomes change significantly or not, marking criteria should be reviewed alongside the assessment redesign process.","sourceSnapshotHash":"1389b66974862e4fff2fea15285fd78f4603e27555e1ee323e9b762ed57e3301","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-dcad-internal-institutional-policy-listed","sourceUrl":"https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"Institutional Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Learning, Teaching and Assessment, June 2025","sourceSnapshotHash":"221e2a570ee0f05193c1c10adf79de564f2d41ecbc1b47022911bc621811ff5b","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-du-dcad-assessment-programme-level-discussion","sourceUrl":"https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2025/08/27/assessment-and-marking-in-light-of-generative-ai/","sourceLanguage":"en-GB","evidenceSnippet":"However, starting this discussion as an iterative process amidst uncertainty is highly recommended versus ignoring the many shifts that have already occurred.","sourceSnapshotHash":"1389b66974862e4fff2fea15285fd78f4603e27555e1ee323e9b762ed57e3301","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"research_guidance","label":"Research guidance","status":"not_mentioned","summary":"No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.","explanation":"This is an absence-of-evidence marker for the current tracker profile, not proof that no such policy exists.","evidenceClaimIds":[],"evidenceSourceUrls":[],"sourceLanguages":[],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0,"evidenceCount":0,"sourceCount":0,"notMentionedReason":"The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.","basis":[]},{"key":"security_procurement","label":"Security and procurement","status":"not_mentioned","summary":"No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.","explanation":"This is an absence-of-evidence marker for the current tracker profile, not proof that no such policy exists.","evidenceClaimIds":[],"evidenceSourceUrls":[],"sourceLanguages":[],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0,"evidenceCount":0,"sourceCount":0,"notMentionedReason":"The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.","basis":[]}],"limitations":["Policy analysis profiles are deterministic summaries of public tracker claims and are not final policy conclusions.","Policy Coverage Score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage; it is not a policy quality score, strictness score, legal adequacy score, safety score, or institutional compliance score.","This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page."],"suggestedCitation":"University AI Policy Tracker. \"Durham University policy analysis profile.\" Version v1. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/durham-university"}}