research
University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.
审核: 智能体已审核
变更日志
University of Antwerp
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
变更摘要
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
University of Antwerp currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of Antwerp。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
差异类别
此版本差异的语义分类。
组合版本差异
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
大学 of Antwerp combined release 差异
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # University of Antwerp AI policy record
2+research: University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.
3+Evidence (en, 1ee2f66ebba0): In addition to verifying the information provided, researchers must acknowledge the use of AI tools in their research. As mentioned earlier, AI tools cannot be listed as authors on a publication.
4+research: University of Antwerp research guidance says that when more responsibility is placed on an AI system, more human control is required, and that researchers remain responsible for correctness and robustness.
5+Evidence (en, bffbba8e7932): Key concept: the more responsibility is placed on the AI system, the more human control is required afterwards. The responsibility for the correctness and robustness of information ALWAYS lies with the researcher.
6+research: University of Antwerp research AI guidelines identify creating core publication or project-application content without thorough fact-checking and substantive editing, and peer review of others' publications or project applications, as uses to avoid.
7+Evidence (en, 1ee2f66ebba0): Use to be avoided: Creating the core content of publications or project applications without thorough factchecking and additional substantive editing. Peer review of publications or project applications by others.
8+teaching: University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.
9+Evidence (nl, f57a89b63311): AI-proofing betekent dat je een onderwijssituatie creëert waarin studenten geen gebruik kunnen maken van AI, of waarin ze door de mand vallen als ze dat toch doen terwijl het niet is toegestaan.
10+teaching: University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.
11+Evidence (en, dd51fd44f8e7): This can be done by making your exam questions sufficiently complex and specific, and by going over guidelines with the students beforehand, clarifying whether and how they can/may use AI tools in your open-book exam.
版本历史
0 public release diffs
声明变更
5 声明 条记录
research
University of Antwerp research guidance says that when more responsibility is placed on an AI system, more human control is required, and that researchers remain responsible for correctness and robustness.
审核: 智能体已审核
research
University of Antwerp research AI guidelines identify creating core publication or project-application content without thorough fact-checking and substantive editing, and peer review of others' publications or project applications, as uses to avoid.
审核: 智能体已审核
teaching
University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.
审核: 智能体已审核
teaching
University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.
审核: 智能体已审核
源快照
4 source attributions
AI-proofing
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 16:20
Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 16:12
Guidelines for (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research at UAntwerp
official_pdf Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 16:16
Open-book exams: what to be mindful of as a lecturer
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 16:18