research
University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Log perubahan
University of Antwerp
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Ringkasan perubahan
Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.
University of Antwerp currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 Mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk University of Antwerp. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.
Belum ada baris perbezaan dasar antara pelepasan yang direkodkan untuk universiti ini. Halaman masih menjejak tuntutan disokong sumber semasa, atribusi rasmi sumber, keadaan semakan, kesegaran sumber, dan JSON awam untuk penemuan dan petikan.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.
Kategori perbezaan
Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.
Perbezaan pelepasan gabungan
Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.
Universiti of Antwerp combined release perbezaan
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # University of Antwerp AI policy record
2+research: University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.
3+Evidence (en, 1ee2f66ebba0): In addition to verifying the information provided, researchers must acknowledge the use of AI tools in their research. As mentioned earlier, AI tools cannot be listed as authors on a publication.
4+research: University of Antwerp research guidance says that when more responsibility is placed on an AI system, more human control is required, and that researchers remain responsible for correctness and robustness.
5+Evidence (en, bffbba8e7932): Key concept: the more responsibility is placed on the AI system, the more human control is required afterwards. The responsibility for the correctness and robustness of information ALWAYS lies with the researcher.
6+research: University of Antwerp research AI guidelines identify creating core publication or project-application content without thorough fact-checking and substantive editing, and peer review of others' publications or project applications, as uses to avoid.
7+Evidence (en, 1ee2f66ebba0): Use to be avoided: Creating the core content of publications or project applications without thorough factchecking and additional substantive editing. Peer review of publications or project applications by others.
8+teaching: University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.
9+Evidence (nl, f57a89b63311): AI-proofing betekent dat je een onderwijssituatie creëert waarin studenten geen gebruik kunnen maken van AI, of waarin ze door de mand vallen als ze dat toch doen terwijl het niet is toegestaan.
10+teaching: University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.
11+Evidence (en, dd51fd44f8e7): This can be done by making your exam questions sufficiently complex and specific, and by going over guidelines with the students beforehand, clarifying whether and how they can/may use AI tools in your open-book exam.
Sejarah keluaran
0 public release diffs
Perubahan tuntutan
5 rekod Tuntut
research
University of Antwerp research guidance says that when more responsibility is placed on an AI system, more human control is required, and that researchers remain responsible for correctness and robustness.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
research
University of Antwerp research AI guidelines identify creating core publication or project-application content without thorough fact-checking and substantive editing, and peer review of others' publications or project applications, as uses to avoid.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
teaching
University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
teaching
University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Snapshot sumber
4 source attributions
AI-proofing
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 Mei 2026, 4:20 PTG
Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 Mei 2026, 4:12 PTG
Guidelines for (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research at UAntwerp
official_pdf Tracker checked at 16 Mei 2026, 4:16 PTG
Open-book exams: what to be mindful of as a lecturer
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 Mei 2026, 4:18 PTG