research
University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Antwerp
Tracker history: 0 release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
5 current claims; 4 official sources.
This page combines all public release diffs for University of Antwerp. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Recorded text comparisons
Only recorded comparisons with an exact Claim ID match are shown.
No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.
Release history
Tracker history: 0 release records.
Current claim records
Current claim records: 5.
research
University of Antwerp research guidance says that when more responsibility is placed on an AI system, more human control is required, and that researchers remain responsible for correctness and robustness.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
University of Antwerp research AI guidelines identify creating core publication or project-application content without thorough fact-checking and substantive editing, and peer review of others' publications or project applications, as uses to avoid.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
Official source records: 4.
AI-proofing
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:20 PM
Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:12 PM
Guidelines for (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research at UAntwerp
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:16 PM
Open-book exams: what to be mindful of as a lecturer
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:18 PM