Policy presence
University of Antwerp has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Antwerp, Belgium
University of Antwerp
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of Antwerp has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Antwerp has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
University of Antwerp has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
University of Antwerp has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Antwerp has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Research
University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1In addition to verifying the information provided, researchers must acknowledge the use of AI tools in their research. As mentioned earlier, AI tools cannot be listed as authors on a publication.
Research
University of Antwerp research guidance says that when more responsibility is placed on an AI system, more human control is required, and that researchers remain responsible for correctness and robustness.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Key concept: the more responsibility is placed on the AI system, the more human control is required afterwards. The responsibility for the correctness and robustness of information ALWAYS lies with the researcher.
Research
University of Antwerp research AI guidelines identify creating core publication or project-application content without thorough fact-checking and substantive editing, and peer review of others' publications or project applications, as uses to avoid.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use to be avoided: Creating the core content of publications or project applications without thorough factchecking and additional substantive editing. Peer review of publications or project applications by others.
Teaching
University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI-proofing betekent dat je een onderwijssituatie creëert waarin studenten geen gebruik kunnen maken van AI, of waarin ze door de mand vallen als ze dat toch doen terwijl het niet is toegestaan.
Localized display only
AI-proofing means creating a teaching situation where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed.
Teaching
University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1This can be done by making your exam questions sufficiently complex and specific, and by going over guidelines with the students beforehand, clarifying whether and how they can/may use AI tools in your open-book exam.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
4 source attribution
AI-proofing
uantwerpen.be
Artificial Intelligence
uantwerpen.be
Guidelines for (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research at UAntwerp
medialibrary.uantwerpen.be
Open-book exams: what to be mindful of as a lecturer
uantwerpen.be