University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
繁體中文

變更紀錄

University of Antwerp

追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。

審閱: 代理已審閱上次查核時間May 16, 2026最後修改May 16, 2026主張5來源4發布紀錄0
大學頁面公開 JSON月報大學索引

變更摘要

目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。

5 條當前主張；4 個官方來源。

此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 University of Antwerp。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。

此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。

本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。

新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。

差異類別

此次版本差異的語意分類。

追蹤器主張文字0新擷取0證據0來源快照0原文0已新增來源0來源已移除0

已記錄的文本比對

僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。

此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。

發布歷程

追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。

當前 Claim 記錄

現行主張紀錄：5。

research

University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.

審閱: 代理已審閱置信度92%證據1語言en

research

University of Antwerp research guidance says that when more responsibility is placed on an AI system, more human control is required, and that researchers remain responsible for correctness and robustness.

審閱: 代理已審閱置信度91%證據1語言en

research

University of Antwerp research AI guidelines identify creating core publication or project-application content without thorough fact-checking and substantive editing, and peer review of others' publications or project applications, as uses to avoid.

審閱: 代理已審閱置信度91%證據1語言en

teaching

University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.

審閱: 代理已審閱置信度87%證據1語言nl

teaching

University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.

審閱: 代理已審閱置信度86%證據1語言en

來源快照

官方來源紀錄：4。