Ann Arbor, United States 最后检查时间

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

独立 · 开放获取 · 非大学官方页面

你想先确认什么?

搜索大学

按主题查看新版记录

课程作业与考核使用

有条件

授课教师按课程、考核和活动确定允许的生成式 AI 用途,并与学院的不当行为政策保持一致。请阅读教学大纲和任务说明。已公布的允许、限制和禁止示例仅为模板,并非全校通用规则。

官方来源 ↗

考试

不明确

请遵守具体的考试及学院规定。当前重新采集的指南确立了考核层面的授课教师权限,但未重新核实具体的考试授权。在来源访问失败后,Rackham 明确许可的声明仍处于待定状态。

官方来源 ↗

披露

推荐

大学原则要求适当披露和引用。请遵守实际课程的规定;示例披露附录或禁令并非在密歇根大学(U-M)全校范围内自动具有强制性。

官方来源 ↗

隐私与数据

受限

使用经批准的服务,并核查每种允许的数据类型;未与密歇根大学(U-M)签约的外部服务应仅接收低级别机构数据。不用于模型训练,并不意味着不处理提示词、历史记录或日志,也不意味着不与供应商共享。统一的保留期限和经认证的敏感数据矩阵仍未确定。

官方来源 ↗

工具与访问

有条件

ITS 为 U-M 的在校活跃用户提供 U-M GPT、Maizey 和 GPT Toolkit,须遵守仅限美国境内的条款。Google 的适用资格不包括赞助附属人员、校友和退休人员。工具访问权限、数据批准和考核使用许可彼此独立。

官方来源 ↗

研究与出版

推荐

研究中应秉持诚实、恰当引用和人类责任原则。OVPR(研究副校长办公室)不鼓励使用生成式AI进行同行评审,并强烈不鼓励将他人的资助申请书上传至商业平台。其关于安全工具的语言/清晰度例外及资助方条件仍然有效。与 HRPP/Rackham 相关的具体表述暂缓处理。

官方来源 ↗
更多已审核记录主题

学术诚信

受限

文理与艺术学院(LSA)区分了讲师解决途径(Instructor Resolution)和学生学术事务解决途径(SAA Resolution),在审理期间推定无责任,并允许答辩/支持人员陪同。课程层面和学院层面的处理结果有所不同。LSA申诉期限为自处理决定书发出之日起两周。不得替代Rackham学院独立的时限计算;检测器输出属于调查线索,而非证据。

官方来源 ↗

教学指南

推荐

密歇根大学(U-M)不推荐使用不可靠的AI检测工具;这并非禁令。授课教师应明确课程规则。护理学院指南规定,AI不应作为唯一的评分依据,涉及可识别身份的学生作业需使用经批准的服务或用途;请勿将此学院规则推广至全校。

官方来源 ↗

安全与采购

受限

人工审查 AI 生成的代码;对所有新应用程序或发生重大变更的应用程序进行专业培训过的同行评审,特别是高风险/受限(High/Restricted)数据。采购服务部门(Procurement Services)应当是处理中度/高风险/受限(Moderate/High/Restricted)数据的机构 AI 的唯一买方。逐项服务批准仍保持独立。

官方来源 ↗

提交前快速检查

建议做

  • 请查看实际的课程和考核规则。
    本站建议
  • 遵循任务中关于披露的说明,并进行适当引注。
    来源建议
  • 对于 LSA,申诉期限应自决定函日期起算。
    本范围要求

应避免

  • 不要将服务访问权限视为考核许可。
    本站建议
  • 不要把“不用于训练”等同于“没有历史记录或日志”。
    本站建议
  • 避免将其他研究人员的申报书上传到商业AI。
    来源建议

收到 AI 使用疑虑?

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

适用规则由课程、学院、服务部门和研究单位决定。LSA的程序不取代Rackham或其他学院的规定。

调查与回应

LSA教师可对不严重、且对作业的后果不超过零分的事件使用 Instructor Resolution(教师处理),也可同时要求补救性工作。SAA Resolution 适用于可能导致课程不及格或更严重处罚、既往责任认定,或伪造学术文件的情形。处理期间,学生被推定为不承担责任,可以继续上课,但不得退课或更改成绩评定方式,教师也不得施加处罚或补救性工作。学期末仍在处理中的案件可能被记为 NR,并妨碍课程学分的获得和毕业。

原始证据与范围

LSA教师可对不严重、且对作业的后果不超过零分的事件使用 Instructor Resolution(教师处理),也可同时要求补救性工作。SAA Resolution 适用于可能导致课程不及格或更严重处罚、既往责任认定,或伪造学术文件的情形。处理期间,学生被推定为不承担责任,可以继续上课,但不得退课或更改成绩评定方式,教师也不得施加处罚或补救性工作。学期末仍在处理中的案件可能被记为 NR,并妨碍课程学分的获得和毕业。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-routes

仅公布了文理学院(LSA)的程序;并非 Rackham 或所有学院。

An instructor within LSA who believes academic misconduct has occurred may choose either Instructor Resolution: Resolve the matter directly with the student Appropriate when: the incident is not egregious and merits no consequence greater than a zero on the assignment, though the student may be required to do additional, remedial work (e.g., rewrite a paper). SAA Resolution: File a complaint to the Office of Student Academic Affairs, who will resolve the case.  Appropriate when: the sanction may result in the student failing the course or more severe sanction, the student has a previous finding of responsibility, or the student is suspected of falsifying or misrepresenting academic documents

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 0–700

大学官方来源 ↗
. Examples of academic misconduct include, but are not limited to: cheating, plagiarism, inappropriate collaboration, falsification of data, records, or documents, and aiding and abetting dishonesty. Deadlines: The complaint for any alleged instance of academic misconduct should be filed as soon as practical from the date of occurrence and should be submitted within 2 months of the date of the incident. Privacy: Materials related to a formal complaint of academic misconduct or an instructor's report of a resolution will be maintained by the Office of Student Academic Affairs in compliance with the privacy expectations under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). While a mis

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 700–1400

大学官方来源 ↗
conduct case is pending, with either Instruction Resolution or SAA Resolution: The student is presumed to not be responsible for the alleged misconduct and the student may continue to attend class and receive grades. The instructor may NOT impose any penalty or require any remedial work until the case has been resolved. The student may NOT change registration in the course (e.g. drop the course or change the grading option to Pass/Fail). If the term ends and a final grade must be reported while a case is pending, the instructor should use the grade NR (No Report). NR is a temporary, neutral grade that may be used in special circumstances where a final grade is not yet able to be reported. Th

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 1400–2100

大学官方来源 ↗
e student may not receive credit for the course in which the alleged misconduct occurred and may not graduate. Note: Students found responsible for academic misconduct with either resolution are not eligible to drop or choose pass/fail grading for the course.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 2100–2359

大学官方来源 ↗

在 LSA SAA 决议中,学术诚信协调员或其指定人员依据优势证据标准作出裁决。学生将获知指控和证据,并可作出回应、提交材料和提出问题。学生携带支持人员参加时,应通知 SAA。通常参与荣誉委员会的人员既不为学生辩护,也不反对学生。

原始证据与范围

在 LSA SAA 决议中,学术诚信协调员或其指定人员依据优势证据标准作出裁决。学生将获知指控和证据,并可作出回应、提交材料和提出问题。学生携带支持人员参加时,应通知 SAA。通常参与荣誉委员会的人员既不为学生辩护,也不反对学生。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-investigation

仅公布了文理学院(LSA)的程序;并非 Rackham 或所有学院。

What an SAA Resolution is A faculty or staff member within LSA who believes academic misconduct has occurred may file a formal complaint of academic misconduct with the LSA Office of Student Academic Affairs who will determine if misconduct has occurred. Important: The instructor should not impose any penalty or require remedial work until the case has been resolved. Once a case has been filed with the Office of Student Academic Affairs, it may not be withdrawn without the approval of the Assistant Dean. Barring unforeseen circumstances, cases will be resolved within the academic term (and typically within three weeks) in which the incident occurs. SAA Resolution Procedures Reporting academi

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 0–700

大学官方来源 ↗
c misconduct Instructor reports a possible case of academic misconduct to SAA using the Report of Suspected Misconduct form Prior to the Academic Misconduct Meeting SAA sends an email to the student stating that an instructor has reported what they believe to be a possible case of academic misconduct. The email also includes a link to set up an Academic Misconduct Meeting.  Once an appointment is scheduled, SAA sends a confirmation email which contains evidence about the allegations of misconduct.  The Academic Misconduct Meeting will determine whether the student is responsible, or not, for the alleged misconduct. An accused student should prepare for the Academic Misconduct Meeting by revi

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 700–1400

大学官方来源 ↗
ewing the information provided, asking any clarifying questions, and show up ready to present any of their own relevant information, read any statement, and/or ask further questions.  During the Academic Misconduct Meeting The Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee will describe the allegations made, detail the supporting evidence, and review the range of college-level sanctions (e.g. disciplinary probation, suspension, or expulsion). This is an opportunity for the student to be heard and to present their side of the incident. The student should be ready to present any relevant material, read a statement, and/or ask questions. Typically, in each meeting a representative of the LSA Stu

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 1400–2100

大学官方来源 ↗
dent Honor Council participates, though they do not advocate for or against the student. Students should notify the Office of Student Academic Affairs if they will have a support person in attendance at the meeting. In certain circumstances, the Coordinator of Academic Integrity may give the student the opportunity to ask questions of the accusing party, either by exchanging written questions or by asking questions during a subsequent meeting. This additional step will be completed prior to the Coordinator or designee’s final decision. The meeting between the accused student and the Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee may be virtual or in-person. Making a decision The Coordinator o

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 2100–2800

大学官方来源 ↗
f Academic Integrity or designee determines whether a violation of the LSA Community Expectations of Academic Integrity has occurred and if the student is responsible for academic misconduct. The standard of review is preponderance. This means that the student is not considered responsible unless the evidence demonstrates that it is "more likely than not" that academic misconduct has occurred. The student will be informed by letter, with an email copy to the instructor(s), of the decision and sanction(s), if any, to be imposed. If a student is found not responsible for academic misconduct, the instructor(s) will grade the student accordingly.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 2800–3450

大学官方来源 ↗

可能的处理结果

在文理学院(LSA),课程成绩处罚遵循任课教师的教学大纲或院系政策;学术事务办公室(SAA)可施加学院层面的处分,包括留校察看、反思性论文、停学或开除。这些属于可能的结果,而非自动的AI处罚。

原始证据与范围

在文理学院(LSA),课程成绩处罚遵循任课教师的教学大纲或院系政策;学术事务办公室(SAA)可施加学院层面的处分,包括留校察看、反思性论文、停学或开除。这些属于可能的结果,而非自动的AI处罚。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-outcomes

仅公布了文理学院(LSA)的程序;并非 Rackham 或所有学院。

If a student is found responsible for academic misconduct: Course-level sanctions: appropriate grade penalties for the misconduct will be left up to the instructor based on syllabus grade policies or department policies, if applicable. College-level sanctions: The student may be assigned college sanctions by the Office of Student Academic Affairs. Examples of these sanctions include:  Disciplinary probation - students are placed on probation for one year. As part of this process, a notation is placed on the student's unofficial transcript. This notation serves as a warning and reprimand that the student has been found responsible for academic misconduct. After that one year period, the notat

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 680–686; characters 19107–20495; excerpt offset 0–700

大学官方来源 ↗
ion is removed provided no further violations of academic misconduct have occurred. Reflective Essay - the student must write an essay about their experience, share what they have learned from it, and discuss how they intend to incorporate LSA Community Expectations into their personal and academic life moving forward. Suspension - the student is ineligible to enroll at the university for one semester and a permanent notation is added to their transcript. In order to re-enroll in future terms, the student must write a petition for reactivation at least two weeks prior to the start of the term they wish to enroll. Expulsion - The student is permanently removed from the university.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 680–686; characters 19107–20495; excerpt offset 700–1388

大学官方来源 ↗

对于在 LSA 课程中的其他学院学生,SAA 判定其课程学术诚信违规情况及教师课程处分权;该学生所在的本学院予以学院处分,包括采纳其接受的任何建议。

原始证据与范围

对于在 LSA 课程中的其他学院学生,SAA 判定其课程学术诚信违规情况及教师课程处分权;该学生所在的本学院予以学院处分,包括采纳其接受的任何建议。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-cross-school

仅公布了文理学院(LSA)的程序;并非 Rackham 或所有学院。

If a student registered in another school is accused of misconduct in an LSA course: SAA's authority includes deciding whether or not the alleged action is a violation of Academic Integrity and whether course-level sanctions may be applied if the student is found responsible for misconduct. Course-level sanctions are left up to the instructor. SAA will recommend a sanction or sanctions to the School or College in which the student is registered, but that School or College has the responsibility for imposing any recommendation or additional sanction it determines appropriate.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 729–732; characters 23599–24180; excerpt offset 0–581

大学官方来源 ↗

复核与申诉

被裁定负有责任的LSA学生,可自决定书之日起两周内向学术司法委员会(AJC)提交书面申诉,对责任认定、学院处分或两者提出质疑。申诉理由包括严重程序错误、重要且此前无法获得的证据,或学院处分过重。申诉期间处分仍然有效。涉及歧视或被禁止行为的指控还须提交ECRT,并暂停申诉。AJC可撤销责任认定,或建议维持、减轻或加重处分。

原始证据与范围

被裁定负有责任的LSA学生,可自决定书之日起两周内向学术司法委员会(AJC)提交书面申诉,对责任认定、学院处分或两者提出质疑。申诉理由包括严重程序错误、重要且此前无法获得的证据,或学院处分过重。申诉期间处分仍然有效。涉及歧视或被禁止行为的指控还须提交ECRT,并暂停申诉。AJC可撤销责任认定,或建议维持、减轻或加重处分。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-appeal

仅公布了文理学院(LSA)的程序;并非 Rackham 或所有学院。

A student who has been found responsible for academic misconduct may submit a written appeal to the LSA Academic Judiciary Committee (AJC), a committee composed of both undergraduate students and faculty members from the College of LSA. Note: If students submit an appeal request, college- and course-level sanctions remain in place while it is pending. If an appeal is based on discrimination or other prohibited behavior, students must also file a report with the Equity, Civil Rights & Title IX Office (ECRT). The appeal process will pause until that matter is resolved. Procedures The student must submit an appeal within two weeks from the date of the resolution letter. The appeal must state wh

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 0–700

大学官方来源 ↗
at is being appealed: the finding of academic misconduct, the college sanction imposed, or both. The appeal must also state and describe in detail at least one of the following grounds for appeal: The procedure was violated in a way that seriously compromised the investigation and/or conclusions. There is significant new evidence not reasonably available at the time of the meeting with the Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee. The college sanctions are excessive relative to the violation. Appeals are not granted unless one or more of the above criteria are met and supported by evidence.  Making a decision A member of the AJC will decide whether the appeal has sufficient grounds to m

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 700–1400

大学官方来源 ↗
ove forward. If it does not, the appeal process ends and the Office of Student Academic Affairs' decision stands. There is no further appeal opportunity. If it is determined that grounds for an appeal have been met, a panel of AJC members will review your case alongside evidence from the instructor and documentation of how the Office of Student Academic Affairs reached its decision. After reviewing the appeal, the AJC may: Reverse the finding of responsibility (overturn the original decision), or Uphold the finding of responsibility. If it's upheld, the Committee may recommend that the Office of Student Affairs keep the sanction as is, reduce it, or increase it. Students will be notified of

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 1400–2100

大学官方来源 ↗
the outcome by email.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 2100–2121

大学官方来源 ↗

AI 工具与获取方式

以下工具限特定对象、账户、模式或用途;不代表全体学生获得使用许可,也不代表考核许可。请核对每项获取条件。

  • Google Gemini校方提供/采购许可附带条件

    符合条件的U-M Google账户可通过gemini.google.com使用;仅适用美国条款。

  • Google Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM)校方提供/采购许可附带条件

    符合条件的U-M(密歇根大学)Google账户,可通过notebook.google.com访问;条款仅适用于美国。

  • U-M GPT校方提供/采购许可附带条件

    需使用机构账号登录;当前具体使用权限未经核实。

  • U-M GPT Toolkit校方提供/采购许可附带条件

    请遵循 ITS Toolkit 入门流程;API 凭据未经测试。

  • U-M Maizey校方提供/采购许可附带条件

    使用机构提供的入门指引;须核实每个数据集的使用许可。

  • Adobe Firefly校方提供/采购许可附带条件

    符合条件的教师/员工/学生使用大学企业级Adobe渠道。

记录更新近 90 天 · 2 次记录更新

这里记录本站已审核资料的更新,不代表学校发布了新政策。

  1. 页面更新

    其他记录 · 页面更新

    查看修订

    正在加载修订…

  2. 暂缓/移出当前结论 · 本站补录 · 本站更正

    课程作业与考核使用 · 考试 · 另 8 个主题 · 涉及 27 条 (更正/调整 13 · 补录 13 · 暂缓 1)

    查看修订

    正在加载修订…

已审阅的声明

26

暂缓结论与历史证据 (1)

这些原始记录及原审核状态仅用于溯源,不作为现行许可、义务或精确期限。

Google NotebookLM is listed for University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

当前状态:暂缓;历史审核状态: agent_reviewed

cl-university-of-michigan-ann-arbor-notebooklm-254

U-M's official AI Tools page says Google NotebookLM is an AI-powered research and note-taking assistant available to all University of Michigan faculty, staff, and students.

官方来源

13个官方网址;13条来源署名及其所采集的版本已保留。

Appropriate Use of AI Services & U-M Policy

genai.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

Appropriate Use of AI Services & U-M Policy · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878427Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

7b24037815ac2e0d6673a6e6b4b66890c1755fc7a59b336eb5e247ef34e57821

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

AI Tools | U-M Generative AI

genai.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

AI Tools | U-M Generative AI · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878781Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

6a1bd7d2d0659d50d6e03b3ff8ba18e64e75e28cafbb67de400c22e62357b74a

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

ITS AI Services

its.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

ITS AI Services · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878868Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

9777508b3bf9712d54d2f8e48999096c557270032f8cbf94d13a4389b916929a

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

U-M Guidance for Faculty/Instructors

genai.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

U-M Guidance for Faculty/Instructors · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878938Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

4ab93d5e509ed9a9ef25039f8f8c62e70b0f55e93f11478e8d9cfdc6b435e705

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

Course Policies & Syllabi Statements

genai.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

Course Policies & Syllabi Statements · 2026-10-23T01:39:15.252727Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

a40033e2b1bca5d6fd5a8c5f30bcfb526fefb99a45e72d9d9868f7b61ed00e7e

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

U-M Guidance for Students

genai.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

U-M Guidance for Students · 2026-10-23T01:39:16.500949Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

1ae5f5b3ac8bac3633bc9f0fd2528be969e03b2e1c0915eb444a82f149c84f07

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

Procedures for Resolving Violations of Academic Integrity - LSA

lsa.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

Procedures for Resolving Violations of Academic Integrity - LSA · 2026-10-23T01:39:16.944292Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

5e4b4638287da2b552656263a5ff04548e64b79ad9128c9e9547991cc9afe25e

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

Plagiarism Detection with Generative AI Tools - ITS

teamdynamix.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

Plagiarism Detection with Generative AI Tools - ITS · 2026-10-23T01:38:20.994164Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

a955fb5487e4e140e4532ae5bacbdd855da2a027e56bdfa917c3a3687d502829

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

Google Gemini & Gemini Notebook - ITS

its.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

Google Gemini & Gemini Notebook - ITS · 2026-10-23T01:39:17.719432Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

ccbf99e4ab4f329cd6dc2545a7a8c660b551dbe3bc7357f2166bcf752447aff9

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

ITS AI Services Privacy Notice

its.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

ITS AI Services Privacy Notice · 2026-10-23T01:39:17.937877Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

83f5cc09e7ef3fe550e0261e0207c50c899cfd2d32dc65fca719de0ad152fa57

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

ITS AI Services Terms of Service

its.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

ITS AI Services Terms of Service · 2026-10-23T01:39:18.777426Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

eddbfedc797c82850a29078ea33519ca288b9689cc49526aabaf93fe715feb7f

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

UMSN Faculty AI Reference Guide

teamdynamix.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

UMSN Faculty AI Reference Guide · 2026-10-23T01:38:21.265369Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

64912597152bcdeeadaad372249bb798fb5a8b8359e30be6fa05a0b5e6cb9864

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗

OVPR Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Internal Peer Review

research.umich.edu

大学官方来源

哈希值与采集版本

OVPR Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Internal Peer Review · 2026-10-23T01:38:21.354357Z

SHA-256:所保留捕获文件的字节。

a9f9a5e7ab31c89aeb784a0907efafb14f549b9dd4252d6ec250537475af1966

哈希确认版本身份,不代表政策仍然有效或审核已获批准。

官方来源 ↗
记录信息、JSON 与引用

审核层级:Claim 的审核状态仅适用于主张;Analysis 是单独的机器汇总,仍需审核。覆盖分数不代表所有政策领域均已查明。

Claim 审核状态
agent_reviewed
Analysis 审核状态
machine_candidate
记录修订版本
uq-hkust-michigan-v6-r4-20261022
数据集发布版本
public-release-20260924-002
本次修订发布时间
学生摘要
未发布
当前已审核 JSON · 历史基线

已发布 V6 展示;JSON 与 MCP 保留原公开记录。补充引文及范围提示待核实;本地候选更正、工具和学生摘要未获公开批准。整校审计仍为 PARTIAL。

  • 保留全部 63 个原始对象/14 个公开 ID/12 个历史工具,保留 24 个原始剩余键以及原始暂存的检测器对象。未编造任何提供的学生快照。
  • 限定 20 个普通请求,15 个替代请求各最多 1 次。s13–s17 替代 429:数据指引、HRPP、科研、Rackham、招生未重新抓取。s26/s27 普通 403 且已知需要认证;无绕过机制。
  • 研究候选项04,05,06,07,10,13因其原始来源的精确重新获取失败而仍被保留;原始主张、研究摘录和时间戳均为私下保留,未作为当前证据呈现。
  • 考试情况尚不明确:直接考核权已被记录,但未重新验证具体考试规则。文理学院(LSA)自决定书 DATE 起两周的期限不得被替换为拉克汉姆研究生院自 RECEIPT 起不受约束的 15 个工作日。
  • 13 个已捕获来源:3 个原始未处理响应,10 个明确标注为 Firecrawl 渲染 HTML 的来源(非原始响应字节)。49 个研究绑定,加上 11 个新的有界上下文绑定。
  • 统一的提示词保留期限、逐项服务的敏感数据矩阵、学位论文/归档、资助方规则、特殊便利支持及全学院覆盖情况尚未解决。
  • 公共 API/MCP/搜索/历史/快照/通知保持不变;独立的协调员语义验收和发布授权待定。
        当前已审核 JSON
        学生常见问题

        学生常见问题

        作业里可以用 AI 吗?

        授课教师按课程、考核和活动确定允许的生成式 AI 用途,并与学院的不当行为政策保持一致。请阅读教学大纲和任务说明。已公布的允许、限制和禁止示例仅为模板,并非全校通用规则。

        查看证据 →
        使用 AI 要怎么披露?

        大学原则要求适当披露和引用。请遵守实际课程的规定;示例披露附录或禁令并非在密歇根大学(U-M)全校范围内自动具有强制性。

        查看证据 →
        敏感资料能上传吗?

        使用经批准的服务,并核查每种允许的数据类型;未与密歇根大学(U-M)签约的外部服务应仅接收低级别机构数据。不用于模型训练,并不意味着不处理提示词、历史记录或日志,也不意味着不与供应商共享。统一的保留期限和经认证的敏感数据矩阵仍未确定。

        查看证据 →
        有哪些工具可以使用?

        ITS 为 U-M 的在校活跃用户提供 U-M GPT、Maizey 和 GPT Toolkit,须遵守仅限美国境内的条款。Google 的适用资格不包括赞助附属人员、校友和退休人员。工具访问权限、数据批准和考核使用许可彼此独立。

        查看证据 →
        考试中使用 AI 有哪些规定?

        请遵守具体的考试及学院规定。当前重新采集的指南确立了考核层面的授课教师权限,但未重新核实具体的考试授权。在来源访问失败后,Rackham 明确许可的声明仍处于待定状态。

        查看证据 →
        科研与发表有哪些 AI 使用要求?

        研究中应秉持诚实、恰当引用和人类责任原则。OVPR(研究副校长办公室)不鼓励使用生成式AI进行同行评审,并强烈不鼓励将他人的资助申请书上传至商业平台。其关于安全工具的语言/清晰度例外及资助方条件仍然有效。与 HRPP/Rackham 相关的具体表述暂缓处理。

        查看证据 →
        哪些 AI 使用可能涉及学术违规?

        文理与艺术学院(LSA)区分了讲师解决途径(Instructor Resolution)和学生学术事务解决途径(SAA Resolution),在审理期间推定无责任,并允许答辩/支持人员陪同。课程层面和学院层面的处理结果有所不同。LSA申诉期限为自处理决定书发出之日起两周。不得替代Rackham学院独立的时限计算;检测器输出属于调查线索,而非证据。

        查看证据 →
        教师使用 AI 有哪些指导?

        密歇根大学(U-M)不推荐使用不可靠的AI检测工具;这并非禁令。授课教师应明确课程规则。护理学院指南规定,AI不应作为唯一的评分依据,涉及可识别身份的学生作业需使用经批准的服务或用途;请勿将此学院规则推广至全校。

        查看证据 →
        安全审核与采购有哪些要求?

        人工审查 AI 生成的代码;对所有新应用程序或发生重大变更的应用程序进行专业培训过的同行评审,特别是高风险/受限(High/Restricted)数据。采购服务部门(Procurement Services)应当是处理中度/高风险/受限(Moderate/High/Restricted)数据的机构 AI 的唯一买方。逐项服务批准仍保持独立。

        查看证据 →
        这份记录最近何时核查?

        记录核查日期:

        记录版本 →
        这些规则来自哪些官方文件?官方来源 →
        哪里能查看完整的政策证据?

        26 · 完整政策证据

        完整政策证据 →