課程作業與指定作業
未經教師書面核准預設禁止(遵循學院)
在哥倫比亞大學的分權化學術治理下,各學院的課程作業政策有所不同:遵循 CSSI 標準與紀律(§C.3)的學院將未經授權的 AI 輔助視為學術不端,需要教師的書面許可;哥倫比亞法學院建立了預設規則,允許定義明確的研究與寫作支援,除非教師另以書面形式修改(§8,§Default);哥倫比亞商學院則要求遵循教學大綱所指定的作業模式。
課程作業與指定作業Columbia University
未經教師書面核准預設禁止(遵循學院)
狀態與範圍
哥伦比亚大学各学院学生(受各院院长采纳决定、法学院默认规则或学院荣誉准则约束)
在哥倫比亞大學的分權化學術治理下,各學院的課程作業政策有所不同:遵循 CSSI 標準與紀律(§C.3)的學院將未經授權的 AI 輔助視為學術不端,需要教師的書面許可;哥倫比亞法學院建立了預設規則,允許定義明確的研究與寫作支援,除非教師另以書面形式修改(§8,§Default);哥倫比亞商學院則要求遵循教學大綱所指定的作業模式。
- 請查閱您所屬學院的政策與課程大綱,以確定是否允許在課程作業中使用 AI;若學院政策有此規定,須取得教師的書面許可。
- 請運用獨立的批判性思考,並在納入前查證所有 AI 生成的參考文獻、論證與引註。
- 切勿假設各學院的許可完全一致;請恪守具體教學大綱指示與學院規則。
原始官方證據
2 個來源 · 跳至來源
Standards and Discipline 2026-2027
來源版本
未記錄版本;引文另行保留
Absent a clear statement or approval in writing from a course instructor granting permission, the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to complete an assignment, exam, or any other coursework is prohibited. This may include but is not limited to using AI for translation services, crafting study materials, organizing a works cited page, “polishing” a student’s work, etc.
主張與地點詳情
規範與紀律 2026-2027
standards-and-discipline-2026-2027
§C.3 (PDF p. 8 / Print p. 6); Extracted text SHA256 cfd351450ca5a2e7fbb329f0922c9d3a52587d261c49a60a9f44e09e358a5dba; original binding lines 655–663; characters 12574–12962
The Associate Vice President (“AVP”) for Student Success and Intervention in the Center for Student Success and Intervention (“CSSI”) is appointed to oversee and manage the Dean’s Discipline process at the behest of the Deans of each school adhering to the Standards and Discipline, or the “Policy,” and accompanying procedures. The AVP or designee may appoint administrative Hearing Officers to efficiently and effectively supervise and facilitate the Dean’s Discipline process. Adoption of the following guidelines is at the discretion of the Dean of each school. In matters not contemplated under this specific policy and -1 1- procedure, a school may appoint Student Conduct (“SC”) to conduct the investigation, support the administration of a separate established discipline process, or administer the Dean’s Discipline process described herein on their behalf.
主張與地點詳情
規範與紀律 2026-2027
standards-and-discipline-2026-2027
§I.A (PDF p. 3 / Print p. 1); Extracted text SHA256 cfd351450ca5a2e7fbb329f0922c9d3a52587d261c49a60a9f44e09e358a5dba; original binding lines 115–151; characters 1712–2587
Columbia Law School: Policy on Student Use of Generative AI
來源版本
未記錄版本;引文另行保留
Writing Support and Error Correction: Students are permitted to consult AI to test arguments, solicit criticism, and explore alternative articulations. Students may also use AI to improve their written work, including for clarity and reliability, alternate phrasing, and tone and concision. Students are also permitted to use AI tools to assist in identifying and correcting spelling and grammatical errors. In all of these cases, students are required to independently and rigorously assess the feedback generated by AI, using their own critical judgment to decide whether and how to implement any suggestions.
主張與地點詳情
哥倫比亞法學院:學生使用生成式 AI 政策
law-school-ai-policy
§8.3 (Writing Support and Error Correction); Extracted text SHA256 9d9ed8d41848f2c05ec4c9ae3b3a4392e98f951ca0ebd401a55919f21369d891; original binding lines 339–339; characters 15347–15958
Default: The Rules set forth in Sections 8 through 11 of this Policy are considered defaults. Individual instructors may adopt alternative course or assignment-specific policies as long as they do so in writing, at a minimum in the initial course syllabus, and with advance notice to all students. To the extent that a faculty member does not communicate an alternative this Policy will apply.
主張與地點詳情
哥倫比亞法學院:學生使用生成式 AI 政策
law-school-ai-policy
§Default; Extracted text SHA256 9d9ed8d41848f2c05ec4c9ae3b3a4392e98f951ca0ebd401a55919f21369d891; original binding lines 299–299; characters 10379–10772
Generation of Written Work: Work submitted for academic credit must be student-composed, not AI-generated. Student-composed work reflects ideas, arguments, analysis, and expression that are the product of the student's own intellectual creativity and judgment. Students must deliberately choose the positions they advance; understand and be able to explain and defend every material proposition in their submissions; and accept responsibility for the accuracy, reasoning, and conclusions reflected in their work. Revising, editing, or paraphrasing AI-generated text does not, by itself, transform AI-generated work into student-generated work. Even when assisted by AI tools, students bear full intellectual responsibility for every proposition in their submitted work.
主張與地點詳情
哥倫比亞法學院:學生使用生成式 AI 政策
law-school-ai-policy
§9.2 (Generation of Written Work); Extracted text SHA256 9d9ed8d41848f2c05ec4c9ae3b3a4392e98f951ca0ebd401a55919f21369d891; original binding lines 351–351; characters 16878–17647





