New York City, United States

City University of New York

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources2Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/city-university-of-new-york.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

AI disclosure

City University of New York has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

City University of New York has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

City University of New York has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

City University of New York

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy says use of generative AI tools must align with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the syllabus or communicated by the instructor.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: Generative AI use is assignment- and instructor-policy dependent.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Any use of generative AI tools must be in line with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the course of the syllabus and/or communicated by the course instructor.

Academic Integrity

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy treats unauthorized use or attempted use of artificial intelligence systems during an academic exercise as cheating.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: Unauthorized AI-system use during an academic exercise is included in cheating.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Cheating is the unauthorized use or attempted use of material, information, notes, study aids, devices, artificial intelligence (AI) systems, or communication during an academic exercise.

Academic Integrity

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy includes unauthorized use of AI-generated content, including paraphrased AI-generated content without citing AI as the source, as an example of plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: Unauthorized or uncited AI-generated content may be plagiarism under the CUNY policy examples.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Unauthorized use of AI-generated content; or use of AI-generated content, whether in whole or in part, even when paraphrased, without citing the AI as the source.

Privacy

CUNY's AI Academic Hub lists Privacy & Data Protection, including FERPA compliance, among its guiding AI principles and advises avoiding sensitive or identifiable data when working with AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: AI use should protect data and avoid sensitive or identifiable data.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Privacy & Data Protection (FERPA Compliance) - AI must protect student and faculty data. ... When working with AI tools, avoid sharing sensitive or identifiable data.

Teaching

CUNY's AI Academic Hub advises faculty to guide AI use with clarity by establishing responsible AI engagement in coursework.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: Faculty are advised to establish clear responsible-AI engagement in coursework.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
For Faculty: AI-Enhanced Teaching & Research ... Guide AI Use with Clarity - Establish responsible AI engagement in coursework.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities