teaching
CUNY's AI Academic Hub advises faculty to guide AI use with clarity by establishing responsible AI engagement in coursework.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
City University of New York
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
City University of New York currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
City University of New York current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+10-0
11 # City University of New York AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy says use of generative AI tools must align with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the syllabus or communicated by the instructor.
3+Evidence (en, 55da32ee9dbf): Any use of generative AI tools must be in line with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the course of the syllabus and/or communicated by the course instructor.
4+academic_integrity: CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy treats unauthorized use or attempted use of artificial intelligence systems during an academic exercise as cheating.
5+Evidence (en, 55da32ee9dbf): Cheating is the unauthorized use or attempted use of material, information, notes, study aids, devices, artificial intelligence (AI) systems, or communication during an academic exercise.
6+academic_integrity: CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy includes unauthorized use of AI-generated content, including paraphrased AI-generated content without citing AI as the source, as an example of plagiarism.
7+Evidence (en, 55da32ee9dbf): Unauthorized use of AI-generated content; or use of AI-generated content, whether in whole or in part, even when paraphrased, without citing the AI as the source.
8+privacy: CUNY's AI Academic Hub lists Privacy & Data Protection, including FERPA compliance, among its guiding AI principles and advises avoiding sensitive or identifiable data when working with AI tools.
9+Evidence (en, aea60800582a): Privacy & Data Protection (FERPA Compliance) - AI must protect student and faculty data. ... When working with AI tools, avoid sharing sensitive or identifiable data.
10+teaching: CUNY's AI Academic Hub advises faculty to guide AI use with clarity by establishing responsible AI engagement in coursework.
11+Evidence (en, aea60800582a): For Faculty: AI-Enhanced Teaching & Research ... Guide AI Use with Clarity - Establish responsible AI engagement in coursework.
Claim changes
5 claim records
privacy
CUNY's AI Academic Hub lists Privacy & Data Protection, including FERPA compliance, among its guiding AI principles and advises avoiding sensitive or identifiable data when working with AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy includes unauthorized use of AI-generated content, including paraphrased AI-generated content without citing AI as the source, as an example of plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy says use of generative AI tools must align with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the syllabus or communicated by the instructor.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy treats unauthorized use or attempted use of artificial intelligence systems during an academic exercise as cheating.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
AI Academic Hub - The City University of New York
official_guidance checked May 17, 2026
Article I - CUNY Policy
official_policy_page checked May 17, 2026