Palaiseau Cedex, France Last checked Oct 22, 2026

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Can I use AI for my coursework?Conditional Do I need to disclose AI use?Required Can I upload sensitive data?Unclear Which tools can I access?Unclear

Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautions Record updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework conditions

Conditional

For IP Paris M1/M2 in 2026–27, outside examinations AI support is described for information search, knowledge deepening and reasoning checks, subject to full disclosure, plagiarism restrictions and explicit instructor bans. Member-school/course conditions remain separate.

Official source ↗

Examinations

Conditional

AI use in any examination requires explicit instructor authorization in the applicable instructions. This is limited to the covered 2026–27 Master scope.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required

The 2026–27 Master rules require systematic, precise and detailed disclosure for permitted non-exam AI support; examination citation follows academic citation rules. Citation alone does not authorize use.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Unclear

The Master regulation requires confidentiality for scientific, technical and institutional information. It does not establish AI vendor training, retention or student account controls.

Official source ↗

Tools and access

Unclear

No student product access, procurement, cost or endorsement is established by this review. Teacher-facing resources are not student access or assessment permission.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Unclear

The regulation states confidentiality duties for Master research and thesis information; broader thesis, publication and third-party service conditions remain unverified.

Official source ↗

Academic Integrity

Restricted

For 2026–27 IP Paris M1/M2, unauthorized exam AI use is fraud and reproduction beyond duly cited short excerpts is plagiarism. Academic penalties and disciplinary jurisdiction are stated separately; no numerical appeal deadline is established.

Official source ↗

Teaching Guidance

Recommended

École polytechnique’s instructor resource catalogue lists Turnitin, AI Text Classifier and GPTZero, including a Moodle authenticity workflow. This is teacher-facing resource guidance, not a detector accuracy finding or student permission.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Unclear

Central institutional IT security evaluations, commercial vendor data agreements, and unified procurement catalogs for artificial intelligence platforms remain an unverified evidence gap.

Do

Systematically, precisely, and fully disclose any use of generative AI in coursework (information searching, knowledge deepening, or method testing), and follow academic citation rules when authorized in exams.
Requirement in this scope
Systematically, precisely, and fully disclose any use of generative AI in coursework (information searching, knowledge deepening, or method testing), and follow academic citation rules when authorized in exams.
Scope
Institut Polytechnique de Paris Master Academic Regulations (Règlement des études de master 2026–2027, approved by CA on July 1, 2026, applicable to M1 and M2 students across all tracks), research confidentiality mandates, and École polytechnique instructional teaching resources.
For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, AI use in any examination is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly authorizes it in their instructions; unauthorized use constitutes fraud. Outside examinations, AI may support information searches, knowledge deepening or reasoning checks with systematic, precise, detailed disclosure, subject to explicit instructor bans stated in course instructions and plagiarism restrictions.
Original evidence and scope
For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, AI use in any examination is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly authorizes it in their instructions; unauthorized use constitutes fraud. Outside examinations, AI may support information searches, knowledge deepening or reasoning checks with systematic, precise, detailed disclosure, subject to explicit instructor bans stated in course instructions and plagiarism restrictions.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-ai-exams-and-coursework
Applicable pour l’année académique 2026-2027 Adopté par le Conseil d’Administration de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris, dans sa séance du 01 juillet 2026
Cover; PDF physical page 1; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 4–7; characters 133–289; excerpt offset 0–156
Official university source ↗
Les règles présentées dans ce document s’appliquent à tous les étudiants inscrits en première ou en deuxième année d’un master de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris).
Préambule; PDF physical page 2; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 47–48; characters 5108–5283; excerpt offset 0–175
Official university source ↗
L’usage d’une intelligence artificielle (IA) est interdit dans tout examen, quelle qu’en soit la forme, sauf autorisation explicite de l’enseignant mentionnée dans ses consignes. Tout usage non autorisé est constitutif d’une fraude. Lorsque l’usage de l’IA est autorisé, l’étudiant doit en déclarer l’utilisation dans le respect des règles académiques de citation.
§5.2 L’utilisation de l’Intelligence Artificielle; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 373–376; characters 26435–26799; excerpt offset 0–364
Official university source ↗
En dehors des examens, l’IA peut être mobilisée pour rechercher des informations, approfondir des connaissances ou tester des raisonnements et des méthodes. Dans ce cas, l’étudiant doit mentionner de manière systématique, précise et détaillée le recours à l’IA. Toute erreur, inexactitude ou biais résultant de l’utilisation de l’IA demeure de la responsabilité de l’étudiant.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 378–381; characters 26801–27177; excerpt offset 0–376
Official university source ↗
L’enseignant peut toutefois interdire strictement toute utilisation de l’IA dans le cadre d’un travail, d’un rendu ou pour l’ensemble de son unité d’enseignement, à condition que cette interdiction soit explicitement mentionnée dans les consignes.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 385–387; characters 27334–27581; excerpt offset 0–247
Official university source ↗
For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, permitted AI use in examinations must be declared according to academic citation rules; non-examination AI support use must be systematically, precisely and fully disclosed. Citation alone does not authorize an otherwise forbidden examination or reproduction of generated content beyond properly cited short excerpts.
Original evidence and scope
For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, permitted AI use in examinations must be declared according to academic citation rules; non-examination AI support use must be systematically, precisely and fully disclosed. Citation alone does not authorize an otherwise forbidden examination or reproduction of generated content beyond properly cited short excerpts.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-ai-disclosure
L’usage d’une intelligence artificielle (IA) est interdit dans tout examen, quelle qu’en soit la forme, sauf autorisation explicite de l’enseignant mentionnée dans ses consignes. Tout usage non autorisé est constitutif d’une fraude. Lorsque l’usage de l’IA est autorisé, l’étudiant doit en déclarer l’utilisation dans le respect des règles académiques de citation.
§5.2 L’utilisation de l’Intelligence Artificielle; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 373–376; characters 26435–26799; excerpt offset 0–364
Official university source ↗
En dehors des examens, l’IA peut être mobilisée pour rechercher des informations, approfondir des connaissances ou tester des raisonnements et des méthodes. Dans ce cas, l’étudiant doit mentionner de manière systématique, précise et détaillée le recours à l’IA. Toute erreur, inexactitude ou biais résultant de l’utilisation de l’IA demeure de la responsabilité de l’étudiant.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 378–381; characters 26801–27177; excerpt offset 0–376
Official university source ↗
La reproduction de contenus générés par l’IA (texte, code ou toute autre production), au-delà de courts extraits dûment cités, est assimilée à du plagiat.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 381–383; characters 27178–27332; excerpt offset 0–154
Official university source ↗
Keep all scientific, technical, and institutional data from IP Paris or affiliated research laboratories strictly confidential without time limitation when conducting research or preparing theses.
Requirement in this scope
Keep all scientific, technical, and institutional data from IP Paris or affiliated research laboratories strictly confidential without time limitation when conducting research or preparing theses.
Scope
Institut Polytechnique de Paris Master Academic Regulations (Règlement des études de master 2026–2027, approved by CA on July 1, 2026, applicable to M1 and M2 students across all tracks), research confidentiality mandates, and École polytechnique instructional teaching resources.
IP Paris Master students preparing research and theses must keep IP Paris or laboratory-specific scientific, technical and institutional information strictly confidential without a time limit. This does not establish an AI vendor retention or upload approval policy.
Original evidence and scope
IP Paris Master students preparing research and theses must keep IP Paris or laboratory-specific scientific, technical and institutional information strictly confidential without a time limit. This does not establish an AI vendor retention or upload approval policy.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-research-confidentiality
Dans le cadre de leurs recherches et de la réalisation de mémoires, les étudiants s’engagent à respecter des règles de confidentialité. L’étudiant s’engage à considérer comme strictement confidentielles, sans limitation de durée, toutes les informations propres à IP Paris ou à son centre de recherche1 dont il pourrait avoir connaissance dans le cadre de ses recherches.
§12 Propriété intellectuelle et confidentialité; PDF physical page 12; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 617–620; characters 40664–41035; excerpt offset 0–371
Official university source ↗
Check course-specific instructions and partner school arrangements in advance; note that formal exceptions for external partner or dual-degree Master elements must be submitted by the program lead (responsable de la formation) to the Graduate School direction for prior approval before September 1.
Source guidance
Check course-specific instructions and partner school arrangements in advance; note that formal exceptions for external partner or dual-degree Master elements must be submitted by the program lead (responsable de la formation) to the Graduate School direction for prior approval before September 1.
Scope
Institut Polytechnique de Paris Master Academic Regulations (Règlement des études de master 2026–2027, approved by CA on July 1, 2026, applicable to M1 and M2 students across all tracks), research confidentiality mandates, and École polytechnique instructional teaching resources.
Exceptions for external partner or dual-degree Master elements must be submitted by the program lead to the Graduate School for prior approval before the academic year begins, namely by 1 September.
Original evidence and scope
Exceptions for external partner or dual-degree Master elements must be submitted by the program lead to the Graduate School for prior approval before the academic year begins, namely by 1 September.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-partnership-exceptions
Ces exceptions doivent être soumises, avant le début de l’année académique, à savoir le 1er septembre, par le responsable de la formation à la direction de la Graduate School pour approbation préalable.
Préambule: partnership and dual-degree exceptions; PDF physical page 2; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 53–55; characters 5772–5974; excerpt offset 0–202
Official university source ↗
Les règles présentées dans ce document s’appliquent à tous les étudiants inscrits en première ou en deuxième année d’un master de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris).
Préambule; PDF physical page 2; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 47–48; characters 5108–5283; excerpt offset 0–175
Official university source ↗
For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, AI use in any examination is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly authorizes it in their instructions; unauthorized use constitutes fraud. Outside examinations, AI may support information searches, knowledge deepening or reasoning checks with systematic, precise, detailed disclosure, subject to explicit instructor bans stated in course instructions and plagiarism restrictions.
Original evidence and scope
For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, AI use in any examination is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly authorizes it in their instructions; unauthorized use constitutes fraud. Outside examinations, AI may support information searches, knowledge deepening or reasoning checks with systematic, precise, detailed disclosure, subject to explicit instructor bans stated in course instructions and plagiarism restrictions.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-ai-exams-and-coursework
Applicable pour l’année académique 2026-2027 Adopté par le Conseil d’Administration de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris, dans sa séance du 01 juillet 2026
Cover; PDF physical page 1; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 4–7; characters 133–289; excerpt offset 0–156
Official university source ↗
Les règles présentées dans ce document s’appliquent à tous les étudiants inscrits en première ou en deuxième année d’un master de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris).
Préambule; PDF physical page 2; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 47–48; characters 5108–5283; excerpt offset 0–175
Official university source ↗
L’usage d’une intelligence artificielle (IA) est interdit dans tout examen, quelle qu’en soit la forme, sauf autorisation explicite de l’enseignant mentionnée dans ses consignes. Tout usage non autorisé est constitutif d’une fraude. Lorsque l’usage de l’IA est autorisé, l’étudiant doit en déclarer l’utilisation dans le respect des règles académiques de citation.
§5.2 L’utilisation de l’Intelligence Artificielle; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 373–376; characters 26435–26799; excerpt offset 0–364
Official university source ↗
En dehors des examens, l’IA peut être mobilisée pour rechercher des informations, approfondir des connaissances ou tester des raisonnements et des méthodes. Dans ce cas, l’étudiant doit mentionner de manière systématique, précise et détaillée le recours à l’IA. Toute erreur, inexactitude ou biais résultant de l’utilisation de l’IA demeure de la responsabilité de l’étudiant.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 378–381; characters 26801–27177; excerpt offset 0–376
Official university source ↗
L’enseignant peut toutefois interdire strictement toute utilisation de l’IA dans le cadre d’un travail, d’un rendu ou pour l’ensemble de son unité d’enseignement, à condition que cette interdiction soit explicitement mentionnée dans les consignes.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 385–387; characters 27334–27581; excerpt offset 0–247
Official university source ↗

Don’t

For IP Paris 2026–27 Master M1/M2 students, do not use generative AI in any examination unless the instructor has given explicit authorization in their instructions; do not use AI in coursework where the instructor has explicitly prohibited it in instructions. Unauthorized use is treated as fraud resulting in a non-compensable grade of 0 for the course unit, potential denial of a resit/annual postponement, and possible disciplinary sanctions.
Requirement in this scope
For IP Paris 2026–27 Master M1/M2 students, do not use generative AI in any examination unless the instructor has given explicit authorization in their instructions; do not use AI in coursework where the instructor has explicitly prohibited it in instructions. Unauthorized use is treated as fraud resulting in a non-compensable grade of 0 for the course unit, potential denial of a resit/annual postponement, and possible disciplinary sanctions.
Scope
Institut Polytechnique de Paris Master Academic Regulations (Règlement des études de master 2026–2027, approved by CA on July 1, 2026, applicable to M1 and M2 students across all tracks), research confidentiality mandates, and École polytechnique instructional teaching resources.
For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, AI use in any examination is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly authorizes it in their instructions; unauthorized use constitutes fraud. Outside examinations, AI may support information searches, knowledge deepening or reasoning checks with systematic, precise, detailed disclosure, subject to explicit instructor bans stated in course instructions and plagiarism restrictions.
Original evidence and scope
For IP Paris M1/M2 students in 2026–27, AI use in any examination is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly authorizes it in their instructions; unauthorized use constitutes fraud. Outside examinations, AI may support information searches, knowledge deepening or reasoning checks with systematic, precise, detailed disclosure, subject to explicit instructor bans stated in course instructions and plagiarism restrictions.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-ai-exams-and-coursework
Applicable pour l’année académique 2026-2027 Adopté par le Conseil d’Administration de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris, dans sa séance du 01 juillet 2026
Cover; PDF physical page 1; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 4–7; characters 133–289; excerpt offset 0–156
Official university source ↗
Les règles présentées dans ce document s’appliquent à tous les étudiants inscrits en première ou en deuxième année d’un master de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris).
Préambule; PDF physical page 2; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 47–48; characters 5108–5283; excerpt offset 0–175
Official university source ↗
L’usage d’une intelligence artificielle (IA) est interdit dans tout examen, quelle qu’en soit la forme, sauf autorisation explicite de l’enseignant mentionnée dans ses consignes. Tout usage non autorisé est constitutif d’une fraude. Lorsque l’usage de l’IA est autorisé, l’étudiant doit en déclarer l’utilisation dans le respect des règles académiques de citation.
§5.2 L’utilisation de l’Intelligence Artificielle; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 373–376; characters 26435–26799; excerpt offset 0–364
Official university source ↗
En dehors des examens, l’IA peut être mobilisée pour rechercher des informations, approfondir des connaissances ou tester des raisonnements et des méthodes. Dans ce cas, l’étudiant doit mentionner de manière systématique, précise et détaillée le recours à l’IA. Toute erreur, inexactitude ou biais résultant de l’utilisation de l’IA demeure de la responsabilité de l’étudiant.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 378–381; characters 26801–27177; excerpt offset 0–376
Official university source ↗
L’enseignant peut toutefois interdire strictement toute utilisation de l’IA dans le cadre d’un travail, d’un rendu ou pour l’ensemble de son unité d’enseignement, à condition que cette interdiction soit explicitement mentionnée dans les consignes.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 385–387; characters 27334–27581; excerpt offset 0–247
Official university source ↗
Under IP Paris’s 2026–27 Master rules, a finding of fraud or plagiarism results in a non-compensable grade of zero for the affected course unit, including projects and internships; a jury may deny a second-session attempt where offered, and a second-session finding results in automatic annual failure. Formal disciplinary sanctions remain a separate possible process.
Original evidence and scope
Under IP Paris’s 2026–27 Master rules, a finding of fraud or plagiarism results in a non-compensable grade of zero for the affected course unit, including projects and internships; a jury may deny a second-session attempt where offered, and a second-session finding results in automatic annual failure. Formal disciplinary sanctions remain a separate possible process.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-academic-sanctions
Tout constat de plagiat, ou plus généralement de fraude, entraîne l’attribution de la note 0 à l’unité d’enseignement concernée, y compris lorsqu’il s’agit d’un projet ou d’un stage. Cette note n’est pas compensable. Cette mesure est appliquée, sans préjudice de la mise en œuvre éventuelle de sanctions disciplinaires.
§5.4 Sanctions académiques; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 410–413; characters 28861–29180; excerpt offset 0–319
Official university source ↗
Le jury de l’élément de formation peut décider de ne pas autoriser l’accès à la seconde session de l’unité d’enseignement concernée, lorsqu’une seconde session est prévue. Cette décision entraîne de plein droit l’ajournement de l’étudiant à l’année. Lorsque les faits sont constatés lors de la seconde session, l’étudiant est automatiquement ajourné à l’année.
§5.4 Sanctions académiques; PDF physical page 9; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 419–423; characters 29241–29601; excerpt offset 0–360
Official university source ↗
Tout acte de fraude, ou tentative de fraude, entraîne des conséquences pédagogiques (notation/validation) ainsi que des sanctions disciplinaires conformément aux textes en vigueur et au règlement intérieur de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris.
§5.3 La fraude; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 404–406; characters 28589–28832; excerpt offset 0–243
Official university source ↗
Do not reproduce AI-generated text, code, or outputs without explicit indication or beyond properly cited short excerpts; presenting AI outputs as personal creation constitutes plagiarism.
Requirement in this scope
Do not reproduce AI-generated text, code, or outputs without explicit indication or beyond properly cited short excerpts; presenting AI outputs as personal creation constitutes plagiarism.
Scope
Institut Polytechnique de Paris Master Academic Regulations (Règlement des études de master 2026–2027, approved by CA on July 1, 2026, applicable to M1 and M2 students across all tracks), research confidentiality mandates, and École polytechnique instructional teaching resources.
For IP Paris 2026–27 Masters, reproducing AI-generated text, code or other output beyond short excerpts appropriately cited is treated as plagiarism. Instructors may explicitly ban AI use in a given task, submission or entire course unit.
Original evidence and scope
For IP Paris 2026–27 Masters, reproducing AI-generated text, code or other output beyond short excerpts appropriately cited is treated as plagiarism. Instructors may explicitly ban AI use in a given task, submission or entire course unit.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-ai-generated-content
La reproduction de contenus générés par l’IA (texte, code ou toute autre production), au-delà de courts extraits dûment cités, est assimilée à du plagiat.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 381–383; characters 27178–27332; excerpt offset 0–154
Official university source ↗
L’enseignant peut toutefois interdire strictement toute utilisation de l’IA dans le cadre d’un travail, d’un rendu ou pour l’ensemble de son unité d’enseignement, à condition que cette interdiction soit explicitement mentionnée dans les consignes.
§5.2; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 385–387; characters 27334–27581; excerpt offset 0–247
Official university source ↗
Cela concerne également l’utilisation de modèles d’intelligence artificielle type Large Language Model (ex de LLM : ChatGPT, MistralAI, Gemini, etc.).
§5.1 Le plagiat; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 369–370; characters 26234–26384; excerpt offset 0–150
Official university source ↗
Under IP Paris’s 2026–27 Master rules, a finding of fraud or plagiarism results in a non-compensable grade of zero for the affected course unit, including projects and internships; a jury may deny a second-session attempt where offered, and a second-session finding results in automatic annual failure. Formal disciplinary sanctions remain a separate possible process.
Original evidence and scope
Under IP Paris’s 2026–27 Master rules, a finding of fraud or plagiarism results in a non-compensable grade of zero for the affected course unit, including projects and internships; a jury may deny a second-session attempt where offered, and a second-session finding results in automatic annual failure. Formal disciplinary sanctions remain a separate possible process.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-academic-sanctions
Tout constat de plagiat, ou plus généralement de fraude, entraîne l’attribution de la note 0 à l’unité d’enseignement concernée, y compris lorsqu’il s’agit d’un projet ou d’un stage. Cette note n’est pas compensable. Cette mesure est appliquée, sans préjudice de la mise en œuvre éventuelle de sanctions disciplinaires.
§5.4 Sanctions académiques; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 410–413; characters 28861–29180; excerpt offset 0–319
Official university source ↗
Le jury de l’élément de formation peut décider de ne pas autoriser l’accès à la seconde session de l’unité d’enseignement concernée, lorsqu’une seconde session est prévue. Cette décision entraîne de plein droit l’ajournement de l’étudiant à l’année. Lorsque les faits sont constatés lors de la seconde session, l’étudiant est automatiquement ajourné à l’année.
§5.4 Sanctions académiques; PDF physical page 9; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 419–423; characters 29241–29601; excerpt offset 0–360
Official university source ↗
Tout acte de fraude, ou tentative de fraude, entraîne des conséquences pédagogiques (notation/validation) ainsi que des sanctions disciplinaires conformément aux textes en vigueur et au règlement intérieur de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris.
§5.3 La fraude; PDF physical page 8; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 404–406; characters 28589–28832; excerpt offset 0–243
Official university source ↗
Avoid inputting confidential laboratory or institutional research data into third-party AI tools (site advice deduced from general research confidentiality obligations, not an explicit AI-specific platform contract); note that where alleged misconduct occurs at a member school or other public higher-education institution, disciplinary jurisdiction belongs to that institution.
Site advice
Avoid inputting confidential laboratory or institutional research data into third-party AI tools (site advice deduced from general research confidentiality obligations, not an explicit AI-specific platform contract); note that where alleged misconduct occurs at a member school or other public higher-education institution, disciplinary jurisdiction belongs to that institution.
Scope
Institut Polytechnique de Paris Master Academic Regulations (Règlement des études de master 2026–2027, approved by CA on July 1, 2026, applicable to M1 and M2 students across all tracks), research confidentiality mandates, and École polytechnique instructional teaching resources.
IP Paris Master students preparing research and theses must keep IP Paris or laboratory-specific scientific, technical and institutional information strictly confidential without a time limit. This does not establish an AI vendor retention or upload approval policy.
Original evidence and scope
IP Paris Master students preparing research and theses must keep IP Paris or laboratory-specific scientific, technical and institutional information strictly confidential without a time limit. This does not establish an AI vendor retention or upload approval policy.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-research-confidentiality
Dans le cadre de leurs recherches et de la réalisation de mémoires, les étudiants s’engagent à respecter des règles de confidentialité. L’étudiant s’engage à considérer comme strictement confidentielles, sans limitation de durée, toutes les informations propres à IP Paris ou à son centre de recherche1 dont il pourrait avoir connaissance dans le cadre de ses recherches.
§12 Propriété intellectuelle et confidentialité; PDF physical page 12; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 617–620; characters 40664–41035; excerpt offset 0–371
Official university source ↗
For IP Paris M1/M2 Master students, where alleged misconduct took place at another public higher-education institution, including an IP Paris member school, that institution’s disciplinary body has jurisdiction, and the IP Paris president is informed. This rule remains in the 2026–27 regulation and turns on the location of the alleged facts, not student registration alone.
Original evidence and scope
For IP Paris M1/M2 Master students, where alleged misconduct took place at another public higher-education institution, including an IP Paris member school, that institution’s disciplinary body has jurisdiction, and the IP Paris president is informed. This rule remains in the 2026–27 regulation and turns on the location of the alleged facts, not student registration alone.
candidate-ipp-master-2026-27-disciplinary-jurisdiction
Conformément à l’article 15 des statuts, la section disciplinaire compétente à l’égard des usagers qui n’ont pas la qualité d’agent public ou de militaire est constituée au sein du conseil académique dans les conditions prévues par les articles R. 811-11 et suivants du code de l’éducation.
§5.5; PDF physical page 9; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 426–428; characters 29631–29921; excerpt offset 0–290
Official university source ↗
Toutefois, en application de l’article R. 811-13, si les faits donnant lieu à des poursuites ont été commis dans un établissement public d’enseignement supérieur distinct de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris, y compris une école-membre, l’usager relève de l’instance disciplinaire de cet établissement et le président de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris est tenu informé de la procédure.
§5.5 Procédure disciplinaire; PDF physical page 9; Extracted text SHA256 9e99733bbd589477cdfe7db5a09f7fa8229465a77c91547ba0c99e19f44c5cb1; original binding lines 430–433; characters 29923–30311; excerpt offset 0–388
Official university source ↗

AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI tools & access

No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-22.

2026-10-27Page update
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-22Held / removed from current conclusions · Record addition · Site correction
Coursework · Exams · 6 more topics · Records involved: 12 (1 corrected / adjusted · 8 added · 3 held)
View revision
Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

Held conclusions and historical evidence (3)

These original records and prior review states are retained for provenance, not as current permissions, duties or precise deadlines.

Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations prohibit the use of generative AI in assessments for those programs unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in written instructions. Unauthorized use constitutes academic misconduct.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

claim-ipp-ai-assessment-policy

In the context of any assessment, regardless of its form (in-class exam, take-home assignment, project, internship report, etc.), the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is strictly prohibited unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in the written instructions. Any violation will be considered academic misconduct.
Academic Regulations For Master Programs - IP Paris
2e20aa963031019d4fb1057b90242d475a1baca72dfa81e791a631e189d415f1

Le règlement des études 2025-2026 des masters de l'Institut Polytechnique de Paris interdit l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle générative dans les évaluations de ces programmes, sauf autorisation explicite de l'enseignant dans ses consignes écrites. Tout manquement est considéré comme une fraude.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

claim-ipp-ai-assessment-policy-fr

Dans le cadre d'une évaluation, quelle que soit sa forme (évaluation sur table, devoir à la maison, projet, rapport de stage, etc.) l'utilisation d'une intelligence artificielle (IA) générative est interdite sauf si l'enseignant l'a explicitement autorisée dans ses consignes écrites. Tout manquement sera considéré comme une fraude.
Règlement des études des masters de l'Institut Polytechnique de Paris
92b0aea4c2b16efbdee72a54123f6c12865df10d79b2667c38448e0a791a646d

Under Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations, when generative AI use is explicitly permitted by an instructor, students must clearly acknowledge its use in accordance with standard citation practices.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

claim-ipp-ai-citation-requirement

If generative AI is explicitly permitted, students who use it must clearly acknowledge its use in accordance with standard citation practices.
Academic Regulations For Master Programs - IP Paris
2e20aa963031019d4fb1057b90242d475a1baca72dfa81e791a631e189d415f1

Official sources

8 official URLs; 8 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Règlement des études des masters de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (2026–2027)

www.ip-paris.fr

University official source

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Hash and captured version

Règlement des études des masters de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (2026–2027) · 2026-10-22T00:00:00Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

074f17e3c3f159397f31478ba84ce26b7658074284eb7649d51509c556d21544

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Masters - official current regulations link

www.ip-paris.fr

University official source

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Hash and captured version

Masters - official current regulations link · 2026-10-22T00:00:00Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

9e1b64549417c98ab9393dd3e1e2460e4b32f3e8f20350df642e1a858818a238

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Academic Regulations for Master’s Programs at the Institut Polytechnique de Paris (2025–26)

www.ip-paris.fr

University official source

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Hash and captured version

Academic Regulations for Master’s Programs at the Institut Polytechnique de Paris (2025–26) · 2026-10-22T00:00:00Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

237a5d5b2a4ba88612dcc0fdf069ef38967c52f26850d47549dbf558c52c028b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Règlement des études des masters (2025–26), French

www.ip-paris.fr

University official source

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Hash and captured version

Règlement des études des masters (2025–26), French · 2026-10-22T00:00:00Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

65ddac738ec3727dd7cb5179cc5ebaaf4c9195f9fe49ed67c7a3e559eb167dba

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Règlement des études des masters (2025–26), historical URL with 2023_2024 filename

www.ip-paris.fr

University official source

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Hash and captured version

Règlement des études des masters (2025–26), historical URL with 2023_2024 filename · 2026-10-22T00:00:00Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

65ddac738ec3727dd7cb5179cc5ebaaf4c9195f9fe49ed67c7a3e559eb167dba

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

IA - Ressources pour les enseignants - Teaching & Learning Center

www.polytechnique.edu

University official source

École polytechnique

Hash and captured version

IA - Ressources pour les enseignants - Teaching & Learning Center · 2026-10-22T00:00:00Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

db8760f5f69022cf76ab85ebe7542b1b495a068fd4b543e258e72d1cba3bb4c6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Ressources IA - Teaching & Learning Center

www.polytechnique.edu

University official source

École polytechnique

Hash and captured version

Ressources IA - Teaching & Learning Center · 2026-10-22T00:00:00Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

3672619945080410d8f188d57dbebe82be243777387779304c7a877e53b28f49

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Règlement intérieur de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (CA 2025-03-14)

www.ip-paris.fr

University official source

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

Hash and captured version

Règlement intérieur de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (CA 2025-03-14) · 2026-10-22T00:00:00Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

595fb347d7f95d9b0aad71ee9c8e5eebbe7f735bb486b248a6d9fc46ef154ce3

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state: agent_reviewed
Analysis review state: machine_candidate
Record revision: paris-northwestern-v6-r1-20261022
Dataset release: public-release-20260924-002
Correction published: 2026-10-22T23:47:33.670Z
Student snapshot: Not published

Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

Current reviewed JSON

Questions students ask

Can I use AI for my coursework?

View evidence →

Do I need to disclose AI use?

View evidence →

Can I upload sensitive data?

The Master regulation requires confidentiality for scientific, technical and institutional information. It does not establish AI vendor training, retention or student account controls.

View evidence →

Which tools can I access?

No student product access, procurement, cost or endorsement is established by this review. Teacher-facing resources are not student access or assessment permission.

View evidence →

What are the examination rules?

AI use in any examination requires explicit instructor authorization in the applicable instructions. This is limited to the covered 2026–27 Master scope.

View evidence →

What rules apply to research and publication?

The regulation states confidentiality duties for Master research and thesis information; broader thesis, publication and third-party service conditions remain unverified.

View evidence →

What counts as academic misconduct?

View evidence →

What guidance applies to teaching?

View evidence →

What security and procurement requirements apply?

Central institutional IT security evaluations, commercial vendor data agreements, and unified procurement catalogs for artificial intelligence platforms remain an unverified evidence gap.

View evidence →

When was this record checked?

Record checked: 2026-10-22

Record version →

Which official sources support these rules?

Official source →

Where can I read the full evidence?

9 · Full policy evidence

Full policy evidence →

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

What would you like to check?

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework conditions

Examinations

Disclosure

Privacy and data

Tools and access

Research and publication

Academic Integrity

Teaching Guidance

Security and procurement

Do

Don’t

AI tools & access

Reviewed claims

Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations prohibit the use of generative AI in assessments for those programs unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in written instructions. Unauthorized use constitutes academic misconduct.

Under Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations, when generative AI use is explicitly permitted by an instructor, students must clearly acknowledge its use in accordance with standard citation practices.

Official sources

Règlement des études des masters de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (2026–2027)

Masters - official current regulations link

Academic Regulations for Master’s Programs at the Institut Polytechnique de Paris (2025–26)

Règlement des études des masters (2025–26), French

Règlement des études des masters (2025–26), historical URL with 2023_2024 filename

IA - Ressources pour les enseignants - Teaching & Learning Center

Ressources IA - Teaching & Learning Center

Règlement intérieur de l’Institut Polytechnique de Paris (CA 2025-03-14)

Related university AI policy records

Questions students ask