Lyon, France

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA)

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA) is listed as QS 2026 rank 406. Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA) has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 1 official source attribution. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA) is listed as QS 2026 rank 406. Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA) has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 1 official source attribution. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/institut-national-des-sciences-appliquees-de-lyon-insa.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources1

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA) has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Source Status

INSA Lyon has a Conseil d'Administration-approved generative AI use charter dated March 5, 2026, and the charter states that it is an annex to the institution's internal regulations and applies to the whole INSA Lyon community.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: approved_generative_ai_use_charter_2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Approuve la charte d'usage de l'intelligence artificielle generative a l'INSA Lyon conformement au document figurant en annexe de la presente deliberation.

Localized display only

The Board approved INSA Lyon's generative AI use charter as the document attached to the deliberation.

Academic Integrity

For INSA Lyon academic evaluations, the generative AI charter says use of generative AI is prohibited unless the teacher gives express instructions, and any violation is treated as fraud and sanctioned under the study regulations and education code.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: ai_prohibited_in_assessments_without_teacher_instruction

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Dans le cadre des evaluations academiques, l'utilisation d'une IAG est interdite sauf consigne expresse de l'enseignant. Toute infraction sera assimilee a une fraude et sanctionnee conformement au reglement des etudes et au code de l'education.

Localized display only

In academic evaluations, generative AI use is prohibited unless expressly instructed by the teacher; violations are treated as fraud and sanctioned.

Academic Integrity

INSA Lyon's generative AI charter says any use of generative AI for productions such as academic work, scientific publications, notes, and administrative documents must be documented transparently with the model/version, date, context, prompts, and purposes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: ai_use_must_be_documented

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Toute utilisation d'IAG pour une production (livrables, travaux academiques, publications scientifiques, notes, documents administratifs ...) doit etre documentee de maniere transparente : modele et version, date, contexte, prompts utilises et finalites de chacun.

Localized display only

Use of generative AI for productions must be transparently documented, including model/version, date, context, prompts, and purposes.

Privacy

INSA Lyon's generative AI charter says use of generative AI tools to process personal, strategic, or confidential data is conditioned on prior institutional validation, and that uncontracted online generative AI services are prohibited for processing personal data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: validated_tools_required_for_sensitive_or_personal_data

Original evidence

Evidence 1
L'utilisation d'outils d'IAG pour traiter des donnees personnelles, strategiques ou confidentielles est conditionnee a une validation prealable par l'etablissement. ... Il est interdit d'utiliser des services IAG en ligne non contractuellement encadres pour traiter des donnees personnelles.

Localized display only

Processing personal, strategic, or confidential data with generative AI requires prior institutional validation; uncontracted online services are prohibited for personal data.

Teaching

INSA Lyon's generative AI charter encourages teachers to specify, for each pedagogical activity, whether generative AI use is authorized, tolerated with conditions, or forbidden; if no teacher instruction is provided, the general charter applies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: teachers_specify_activity_level_ai_rules

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Les enseignants sont encourages a accompagner les etudiants dans une appropriation critique et responsable de ces outils, et a specifier dans chaque activite pedagogique ce qui est autorise, tolere sous conditions, ou interdit en matiere d'usage d'IAG. ... Si aucune consigne n'est fournie par l'enseignant, le cadre general defini dans la presente charte s'applique.

Localized display only

Teachers are encouraged to specify AI-use rules for each pedagogical activity; absent teacher instructions, the general charter applies.

Research

For INSA Lyon research and innovation activities, the generative AI charter says confidential peer-review documents require vigilance around strategic information and that, when confidentiality applies, generative AI use is prohibited.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: confidential_peer_review_ai_use_prohibited

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Les documents soumis a la relecture par les pairs sont confidentiels. Il convient donc de rester vigilant quant a la protection des informations strategiques. Des lors qu'il y a confidentialite, l'usage d'IAG est interdit.

Localized display only

Peer-review documents are confidential; where confidentiality applies, generative AI use is prohibited.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities