Encuentra registros universitarios de politicas de IA respaldados por fuentes

Guidelines on using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for Coursework

Thinking about using generative AI like ChatGPT or Bing for your coursework?

Acceptable Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Coursework Policy

The use of AI tools in coursework

Using Gen-AI in coursework and Assessment

Adam Mickiewicz University has Rector order 426/2023/2024 setting rules for student use of AI systems in education, including theses and coursework/assessment work.

For Adelaide University coursework assessment, the Assessment Procedure states that course coordinators will ensure students are informed about appropriate use of generative AI and similar tools in the course.

ASU Provost FAQs direct students to confer with their instructor about class policy before using AI tools in coursework.

Auburn student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students to review the syllabus and ask the instructor before using AI on coursework.

For ACU coursework students, unauthorized or undisclosed use of generative AI, paraphrasing or translation tools is listed as academic misconduct unless use is authorized in the assessment requirements and properly acknowledged.

Bournemouth University student guidance says using generative AI when writing coursework is not, by itself, an academic offence, while directing students to use the resource responsibly and appropriately.

At Caltech, AI use policies for student coursework are determined by individual departments and/or individual faculty, not by a university-wide policy.

CUNY's AI Academic Hub advises faculty to guide AI use with clarity by establishing responsible AI engagement in coursework.

Columbia Business School requires students to disclose to faculty their use of generative AI platforms and the manner of use in coursework.

Concordia's CTL GenAI FAQ says the university does not currently have an official policy regarding the use of GenAI, and explains that GenAI has not officially been adopted by the university so its use cannot be required in coursework.

Dalhousie's CLT course design guidance tells instructors concerned about student generative AI use in coursework to talk with students about what they can and cannot use it for and how to use it appropriately.

Duke student-facing AI guidance says whether a student may use AI in coursework depends on instructor permission; unauthorized generative AI use is considered academic misconduct under the Duke Community Standard.

Gdańsk University of Technology's education-process GenAI guidance says students may use advanced GenAI tools during coursework when the use is documented.

Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.

HKMU's AI@HKMU position statement frames ChatGPT and similar tools as supplements to coursework and says ChatGPT should not be relied upon solely to complete assignments.

Indiana University guidance says students should use generative AI in ways that align with university academic integrity policies and communicate with instructors before using generative AI in coursework.

FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

Iowa State Student Conduct guidance says suspected AI-generated coursework referrals will be reviewed similarly to other forms of academic misconduct.

Jagiellonian University students must follow instructor AI-tool rules and clearly mark parts of coursework, theses, or other assignments generated with AI-based tools.

KFUPM's AI+X page describes AI+X as an initiative designed to equip every undergraduate student with essential AI skills and says students begin with foundational AI coursework before their selected academic programs.

King's College London does not require students to reference generative AI as an authoritative source in the reference list, but does require explicit acknowledgement of AI tool use in coursework.

KIT ZML says its KI-Policy and form-generator tools are not official or mandatory KIT requirements; final rules for coursework remain with the relevant faculty and instructor.

Korea University tells learners to check each course’s AI-use guideline before coursework and ask the instructor if permission is unclear.

Kyoto University tells students to follow the generative AI use policy set by the course instructor or research supervisor for coursework, reports, and thesis writing.

Lehigh advises instructors to give students clear guidance on how generative AI tools may be used in coursework and research.