Policy presence
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Perth, Australia
The University of Western Australia
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
The University of Western Australia has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
The University of Western Australia has 4 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
The University of Western Australia has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
The University of Western Australia has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
The University of Western Australia has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
13 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For UWA assessments assigned Tier 1, students are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment, and any AI use during that Tier 1 assessment is treated as academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: tier_1_ai_use_is_academic_misconduct
Evidencia original
Evidence 1If your assessment is assigned Tier 1, you are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment. Tier 1 assessments must be secure to accurately show your learning. Any use of AI during a Tier 1 assessment is academic misconduct.
Ai Tool Treatment
UWA’s 2026 student AI guide now states that UWA staff and students must not use DeepSeek in any way, that UWA has blocked DeepSeek on University-managed networks and devices, and that students should avoid using DeepSeek on their personal devices.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: deepseek_banned_explicitly
Evidencia original
Evidence 1Additionally, not all AI platforms are safe to use. The Department of Home Affairs has raised concerns on the safety and security of data shared with the AI tool DeepSeek. As such, UWA staff and students must not use DeepSeek in any way. UWA has blocked the use of DeepSeek on all University-managed networks and devices, and students should avoid using DeepSeek on their personal devices.
Ai Tool Treatment
For UWA coursework assessments, AI tools may only be used where the Unit Coordinator explicitly permits them; permitted use must be cited, referenced, and clearly acknowledged.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessment_ai_requires_unit_coordinator_permission_and_acknowledgement
Evidencia original
Evidence 1For all coursework students AI tools may only be used in an assessment where it is explicitly permitted by your Unit Coordinator. Where it is permitted, you must always cite and reference your uses of it and provide clear acknowledgement of how AI was used.
Ai Tool Treatment
UWA student assessment guidance describes three AI-use tiers that lecturers may apply to assessment tasks: Tier 1 no AI, Tier 2 AI assistance or collaboration, and Tier 3 fully embedded AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: three_assessment_ai_use_tiers
Evidencia original
Evidence 1AI Tiers that may be applied to assessment tasks by your lecturer | TIER 1: No AI | TIER 2: AI assistance or collaboration | TIER 3: Full Embedded AI
Privacy
UWA's 2026 student AI guide says students should not enter personal data or information into public AI systems.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_input_personal_data_into_public_ai
Evidencia original
Evidence 1Students at UWA should not input any personal data or information into any public AI systems (such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and other similar systems).
Academic Integrity
UWA's Academic Integrity Policy includes using material generated by Artificial Intelligence, including generative AI and related tools, in assessments as a type of plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_assessment_material_included_in_plagiarism_policy
Evidencia original
Evidence 1Types of plagiarism include, but are not limited to, the following: using material generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Generative AI and related tools in assessments;
Security Review
UWA has blocked DeepSeek services on UWA-managed devices and networks because of concerns about the safety and security of data shared with DeepSeek's online services.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: deepseek_blocked_on_uwa_managed_devices_and_networks
Evidencia original
Evidence 1The University of Western Australia (UWA) has blocked access to DeepSeek services on all UWA-managed devices and networks. This decision follows directives from the Western Australian Government and the Department of Home Affairs, due to concerns about the safety and security of data shared with DeepSeek's online services.
Academic Integrity
UWA askUWA guidance tells students to reference all AI-generated content used in assessments and says they may be asked to show the AI tools and prompts used.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_assessment_content_must_be_referenced
Evidencia original
Evidence 1You must reference all AI generated content you use in your assessments. You may be requested to show which AI tools you used for your assessment and the prompts you used to produce your work.
Research
UWA research-writing guidance states that AI and other machine-learning language models cannot be authors, and authors should transparently disclose when and how they used them.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_llm_cannot_be_authors_transparency_required
Evidencia original
Evidence 1AI and other machine learning language models cannot be authors. Authors should be transparent when AI and other machine learning language models are used and provide information about how they were used.
Research
UWA research-writing guidance says authors are responsible for ensuring inputs to AI tools are suitable for uploading and processing and that use complies with copyright, privacy, ethics, data-sensitivity policies, and legislation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_inputs_must_comply_with_copyright_privacy_ethics_data_sensitivity
Evidencia original
Evidence 1Authors are responsible for ensuring that all input into AI tools is suitable for uploading and processing and any use is compliant with copyright, privacy, ethics, and data sensitivity policies and legislation.
Ai Tool Treatment
UWA askUWA guidance says limited AI editorial tools may be used for broad editorial assistance in a student's own writing, and the student remains responsible for judging whether suggestions are accurate and appropriate.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: limited_ai_editorial_assistance_with_student_responsibility
Evidencia original
Evidence 1Under UWA's Academic Integrity policy, you are permitted to limited use of AI tools for broad editorial assistance in your writing. This means that you can use spelling, grammar and style checkers for basic feedback on your own written work.
Privacy
UWA’s student AI guide expanded its privacy guidance to clarify that students must not input UWA staff intellectual property (lecture slides, handouts, unit reading material) into public AI systems.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: staff_ip_not_for_ai_input
Evidencia original
Evidence 1It is also important that you do not input any intellectual property or copyright material that is not your own, including the intellectual property of UWA or its staff – such as lecture slides, handouts, and unit reading material – as it is not yours to distribute.
Privacy
UWA Library ethical guidance says users should never upload the University's intellectual property into a generative AI tool unless explicitly instructed to do so.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_upload_university_ip_to_genai_without_instruction
Evidencia original
Evidence 1You should never upload any of the University's intellectual property into a generative AI tool unless you are explicitly instructed to do so.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
10 source attribution
AI use in assessments
uwa.edu.au
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Ethical Considerations
guides.library.uwa.edu.au
Guidance on the use of AI and LLM in research writing
guides.library.uwa.edu.au
How to cite and reference ChatGPT and other generative AI tools in assessments - askUWA
ipoint.uwa.edu.au
University Policy on Academic Integrity
uwa.edu.au
Use of AI tools for editorial assistance - askUWA
ipoint.uwa.edu.au
Use of DeepSeek at UWA - askUWA
ipoint.uwa.edu.au
Using Artificial Intelligence Tools at UWA: A Guide for Students
uwa.edu.au
Using Artificial Intelligence Tools at UWA: A Guide for Students
uwa.edu.au
Using ChatGPT and other AI tools in your assessments - askUWA
ipoint.uwa.edu.au