Policy presence
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Perth, Australia
The University of Western Australia
The University of Western Australia is listed as QS 2026 rank 77. The University of Western Australia has 11 source-backed AI policy claim records from 9 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
The University of Western Australia is listed as QS 2026 rank 77. The University of Western Australia has 11 source-backed AI policy claim records from 9 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists The University of Western Australia as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 13, 2026 and last changed on May 13, 2026. The record contains 11 source-backed claims, including 11 reviewed claims, from 9 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/the-university-of-western-australia.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: DeepSeek.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
The University of Western Australia has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
The University of Western Australia has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: required.
Academic integrity
The University of Western Australia has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
The University of Western Australia has 4 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
The University of Western Australia has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
The University of Western Australia has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
The University of Western Australia has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
11 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For UWA assessments assigned Tier 1, students are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment, and any AI use during that Tier 1 assessment is treated as academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: tier_1_ai_use_is_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1If your assessment is assigned Tier 1, you are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment. Tier 1 assessments must be secure to accurately show your learning. Any use of AI during a Tier 1 assessment is academic misconduct.
Ai Tool Treatment
For UWA coursework assessments, AI tools may only be used where the Unit Coordinator explicitly permits them; permitted use must be cited, referenced, and clearly acknowledged.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessment_ai_requires_unit_coordinator_permission_and_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1For all coursework students AI tools may only be used in an assessment where it is explicitly permitted by your Unit Coordinator. Where it is permitted, you must always cite and reference your uses of it and provide clear acknowledgement of how AI was used.
Ai Tool Treatment
UWA student assessment guidance describes three AI-use tiers that lecturers may apply to assessment tasks: Tier 1 no AI, Tier 2 AI assistance or collaboration, and Tier 3 fully embedded AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: three_assessment_ai_use_tiers
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI Tiers that may be applied to assessment tasks by your lecturer | TIER 1: No AI | TIER 2: AI assistance or collaboration | TIER 3: Full Embedded AI
Privacy
UWA's 2026 student AI guide says students should not enter personal data or information into public AI systems.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_input_personal_data_into_public_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students at UWA should not input any personal data or information into any public AI systems (such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and other similar systems).
Academic Integrity
UWA's Academic Integrity Policy includes using material generated by Artificial Intelligence, including generative AI and related tools, in assessments as a type of plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_assessment_material_included_in_plagiarism_policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Types of plagiarism include, but are not limited to, the following: using material generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Generative AI and related tools in assessments;
Security Review
UWA has blocked DeepSeek services on UWA-managed devices and networks because of concerns about the safety and security of data shared with DeepSeek's online services.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: deepseek_blocked_on_uwa_managed_devices_and_networks
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University of Western Australia (UWA) has blocked access to DeepSeek services on all UWA-managed devices and networks. This decision follows directives from the Western Australian Government and the Department of Home Affairs, due to concerns about the safety and security of data shared with DeepSeek's online services.
Academic Integrity
UWA askUWA guidance tells students to reference all AI-generated content used in assessments and says they may be asked to show the AI tools and prompts used.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_assessment_content_must_be_referenced
Original evidence
Evidence 1You must reference all AI generated content you use in your assessments. You may be requested to show which AI tools you used for your assessment and the prompts you used to produce your work.
Research
UWA research-writing guidance states that AI and other machine-learning language models cannot be authors, and authors should transparently disclose when and how they used them.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_llm_cannot_be_authors_transparency_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI and other machine learning language models cannot be authors. Authors should be transparent when AI and other machine learning language models are used and provide information about how they were used.
Research
UWA research-writing guidance says authors are responsible for ensuring inputs to AI tools are suitable for uploading and processing and that use complies with copyright, privacy, ethics, data-sensitivity policies, and legislation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_inputs_must_comply_with_copyright_privacy_ethics_data_sensitivity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Authors are responsible for ensuring that all input into AI tools is suitable for uploading and processing and any use is compliant with copyright, privacy, ethics, and data sensitivity policies and legislation.
Ai Tool Treatment
UWA askUWA guidance says limited AI editorial tools may be used for broad editorial assistance in a student's own writing, and the student remains responsible for judging whether suggestions are accurate and appropriate.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: limited_ai_editorial_assistance_with_student_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 1Under UWA's Academic Integrity policy, you are permitted to limited use of AI tools for broad editorial assistance in your writing. This means that you can use spelling, grammar and style checkers for basic feedback on your own written work.
Privacy
UWA Library ethical guidance says users should never upload the University's intellectual property into a generative AI tool unless explicitly instructed to do so.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_upload_university_ip_to_genai_without_instruction
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should never upload any of the University's intellectual property into a generative AI tool unless you are explicitly instructed to do so.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
9 source attribution
AI use in assessments
uwa.edu.au
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Ethical Considerations
guides.library.uwa.edu.au
Guidance on the use of AI and LLM in research writing
guides.library.uwa.edu.au
How to cite and reference ChatGPT and other generative AI tools in assessments - askUWA
ipoint.uwa.edu.au
University Policy on Academic Integrity
uwa.edu.au
Use of AI tools for editorial assistance - askUWA
ipoint.uwa.edu.au
Use of DeepSeek at UWA - askUWA
ipoint.uwa.edu.au
Using Artificial Intelligence Tools at UWA: A Guide for Students
uwa.edu.au
Using ChatGPT and other AI tools in your assessments - askUWA
ipoint.uwa.edu.au
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.