University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Perth, Australia Last checked

The University of Western Australia

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?Scoped public references; review incompleteDo I need to disclose AI use?Scoped public references; review incompleteCan I upload sensitive data?Scoped public references; review incompleteWhich tools can I access?Scoped public references; review incomplete
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Scoped public references; review incomplete

The retained record requires the Unit Coordinator’s explicit permission and acknowledgement for assessed AI use. Its three-tier guide and editorial-assistance limits need current source confirmation; do not infer general permission.

Official source ↗

Exams

Scoped public references; review incomplete

The retained Tier1 record prohibits AI in tasks assigned that tier. Whether a particular exam uses that tier is not established here; check its actual instructions and the unrecovered guide.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Scoped public references; review incomplete

askUWA records say to reference AI-generated assessment content and note that tools and prompts may be requested. Disclosure does not replace the Unit Coordinator’s permission.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Scoped public references; review incomplete

Retained student and library records caution against personal data and university intellectual property in public AI. The 2026 guide source is missing; confirm the operative restrictions before uploading course material.

Official source ↗

Tools and eligibility

Scoped public references; review incomplete

DeepSeek blocking and avoidance statements remain recorded, with current-guide gaps. Copilot’s enterprise research-data status does not establish student eligibility, seats, cost or assessment permission.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Scoped public references; review incomplete

Research-writing records reject AI authorship and call for transparent disclosure. Authors remain responsible for suitable inputs, privacy, copyright, ethics and data sensitivity; the full current source is still unverified.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Scoped public references; review incomplete

The existing integrity record classifies AI-generated assessment material within plagiarism rules. Read it with task permission and disclosure conditions; the discipline regulations effective September2026 need separate procedure review.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Scoped public references; review incomplete

The retained guide describes three task-specific AI tiers selected by lecturers. It does not assign a tier to your unit or exam, and the original2026 guide was not recovered.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Scoped public references; review incomplete

The retained security record says DeepSeek is blocked on UWA-managed devices and networks. This does not prove approval of alternative tools or unrestricted personal-device use.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Confirm the Unit Coordinator’s current AI instructions before relying on the retained tier guide.
    Site advice
  • For permitted AI-generated assessment content, keep the reference and be ready to identify tools and prompts.
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Do not treat acknowledgement alone as permission to use AI in a UWA assessment.
    Site advice
  • Do not upload lecture slides or other university material before checking the applicable IP restrictions.
    Site advice
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

The University of Western Australia

UWA records remain references pending source-currentness review: the 2026 guide URL was reported as404. Unit and task instructions must be checked; research-data tool approval is separate from assessment permission.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

Copilot Chat

DeepSeek

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 3

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  3. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

13

Historical and pending public Claims (1)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-university-of-western-australia-microsoft-copilot-335 · excluded_pending_review

These are unchanged published reference records, not a fresh confirmation of current rules. The 2026 student guide URL was reported as 404; its tiers/privacy statements remain historical source assertions pending retrieval. The discipline framework effective 1 September 2026 needs separate review. Copilot approval concerns research-data classification, not individual licences or assessment use.

官网图书馆仅确认研究数据分类表中的企业级工具地位，不能证明用户资格、许可分配或作业使用权。

Record history

Official sources

10 official URLs; 11 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

AI use in assessments

www.uwa.edu.au

University official source

uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

AI use in assessments · 2026-05-13T04:55:20Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

eb1ec0c7babc8809ebff607aa99e431594110f2fefc48f52f9126a840b5c0d70

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Artificial Intelligence (AI): Ethical Considerations

guides.library.uwa.edu.au

University official source

guides.library.uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Artificial Intelligence (AI): Ethical Considerations · 2026-05-13T04:54:10Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

62a6901a6cc8096246abf95d6b5d8e5beea42d260cae19bd49deb6dd373ef4b5

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Ethics & compliance - Research Data Management Toolkit

guides.library.uwa.edu.au

University official source

guides.library.uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Ethics & compliance - Research Data Management Toolkit · 2026-07-15T22:54:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

1e6982799da49ddea4d649e5a91adc8cc134c45b5d3b35294a331cafd9ff8f19

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Guidance on the use of AI and LLM in research writing

guides.library.uwa.edu.au

University official source

guides.library.uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Guidance on the use of AI and LLM in research writing · 2026-05-13T04:54:45Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

b575b9aa7fabe1d121391d3b6b421f1c08ae2dbc86cd220747cdcf2969b9c3a8

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

How to cite and reference ChatGPT and other generative AI tools in assessments - askUWA

ipoint.uwa.edu.au

University official source

ipoint.uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

How to cite and reference ChatGPT and other generative AI tools in assessments - askUWA · 2026-05-13T04:52:45Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

ae089d1b613621cd46a6e963b53180973f1907325dacdaefd096a0d3ff1dee70

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

University Policy on Academic Integrity

www.uwa.edu.au

University official source

uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

University Policy on Academic Integrity · 2026-05-13T04:56:20Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

99d55905697d2a40828dedf98167b7ed69aec9242c5f0fe28a0aac8cdedd319b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Use of AI tools for editorial assistance - askUWA

ipoint.uwa.edu.au

University official source

ipoint.uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Use of AI tools for editorial assistance - askUWA · 2026-05-13T04:52:05Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

a3893eb59dc4f71babc3315c424791beb95492c82dee5f3ace97a69efc5b49c9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Use of DeepSeek at UWA - askUWA

ipoint.uwa.edu.au

University official source

ipoint.uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Use of DeepSeek at UWA - askUWA · 2026-05-13T04:53:25Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

013b58a8850c450239d578075eeae5e911056c97dc8d7c16f9be802c1bd3d2dd

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Using Artificial Intelligence Tools at UWA: A Guide for Students

www.uwa.edu.au

University official source

uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Using Artificial Intelligence Tools at UWA: A Guide for Students · 2026-05-13T04:50:30Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

aecf591a0b5e39661c96b374c2dbcf4ddd6fcc67601adf912458167884fb893c

Using Artificial Intelligence Tools at UWA: A Guide for Students · 2026-07-07T13:19:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

7d754da317549a66ae03290631c1d199876d5b89fe3c00cf16431b6de471a46c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Using ChatGPT and other AI tools in your assessments - askUWA

ipoint.uwa.edu.au

University official source

ipoint.uwa.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Using ChatGPT and other AI tools in your assessments - askUWA · 2026-05-13T04:48:10Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

67d46aef682f8ad511a5efc2b24d6415ff570b9f0ab1a9bd3d71cae6f3bba6d3

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs71-90-v6-completeness-r3-20261025
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Institution audit PARTIAL. Official raw HTML/PDF originals and full version/context verification remain incomplete.
  • Original public records remain unchanged. Excluded records are historical or pending scope review, not current permissions.
  • New corrections, tools, student interpretations and snapshots remain unapproved.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        The retained record requires the Unit Coordinator’s explicit permission and acknowledgement for assessed AI use. Its three-tier guide and editorial-assistance limits need current source confirmation; do not infer general permission.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        askUWA records say to reference AI-generated assessment content and note that tools and prompts may be requested. Disclosure does not replace the Unit Coordinator’s permission.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Retained student and library records caution against personal data and university intellectual property in public AI. The 2026 guide source is missing; confirm the operative restrictions before uploading course material.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        DeepSeek blocking and avoidance statements remain recorded, with current-guide gaps. Copilot’s enterprise research-data status does not establish student eligibility, seats, cost or assessment permission.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        The retained Tier1 record prohibits AI in tasks assigned that tier. Whether a particular exam uses that tier is not established here; check its actual instructions and the unrecovered guide.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Research-writing records reject AI authorship and call for transparent disclosure. Authors remain responsible for suitable inputs, privacy, copyright, ethics and data sensitivity; the full current source is still unverified.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        The existing integrity record classifies AI-generated assessment material within plagiarism rules. Read it with task permission and disclosure conditions; the discipline regulations effective September2026 need separate procedure review.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        The retained guide describes three task-specific AI tiers selected by lecturers. It does not assign a tier to your unit or exam, and the original2026 guide was not recovered.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        The retained security record says DeepSeek is blocked on UWA-managed devices and networks. This does not prove approval of alternative tools or unrestricted personal-device use.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        14 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        The University of Western Australia AI Policy