Change log

The University of Western Australia

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 13, 2026Last changedMay 13, 2026Claims11Sources9

University page Public JSON

The University of Western Australia currently has 11 source-backed claim records and 9 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # The University of Western Australia AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: For UWA assessments assigned Tier 1, students are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment, and any AI use during that Tier 1 assessment is treated as academic misconduct.
3+Evidence (en-AU, aecf591a0b5e): If your assessment is assigned Tier 1, you are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment. Tier 1 assessments must be secure to accurately show your learning. Any use of AI during a Tier 1 assessment is academic misconduct.
4+ai_tool_treatment: For UWA coursework assessments, AI tools may only be used where the Unit Coordinator explicitly permits them; permitted use must be cited, referenced, and clearly acknowledged.
5+Evidence (en-AU, 67d46aef682f): For all coursework students AI tools may only be used in an assessment where it is explicitly permitted by your Unit Coordinator. Where it is permitted, you must always cite and reference your uses of it and provide clear acknowledgement of how AI was used.
6+ai_tool_treatment: UWA student assessment guidance describes three AI-use tiers that lecturers may apply to assessment tasks: Tier 1 no AI, Tier 2 AI assistance or collaboration, and Tier 3 fully embedded AI.
7+Evidence (en-AU, eb1ec0c7babc): AI Tiers that may be applied to assessment tasks by your lecturer | TIER 1: No AI | TIER 2: AI assistance or collaboration | TIER 3: Full Embedded AI
8+privacy: UWA's 2026 student AI guide says students should not enter personal data or information into public AI systems.
9+Evidence (en-AU, aecf591a0b5e): Students at UWA should not input any personal data or information into any public AI systems (such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and other similar systems).
10+academic_integrity: UWA's Academic Integrity Policy includes using material generated by Artificial Intelligence, including generative AI and related tools, in assessments as a type of plagiarism.
11+Evidence (en-AU, 99d55905697d): Types of plagiarism include, but are not limited to, the following: using material generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Generative AI and related tools in assessments;
12+security_review: UWA has blocked DeepSeek services on UWA-managed devices and networks because of concerns about the safety and security of data shared with DeepSeek's online services.
13+Evidence (en-AU, 013b58a8850c): The University of Western Australia (UWA) has blocked access to DeepSeek services on all UWA-managed devices and networks. This decision follows directives from the Western Australian Government and the Department of Home Affairs, due to concerns about the safety and security of data shared with DeepSeek's online services.
14+academic_integrity: UWA askUWA guidance tells students to reference all AI-generated content used in assessments and says they may be asked to show the AI tools and prompts used.
15+Evidence (en-AU, ae089d1b6136): You must reference all AI generated content you use in your assessments. You may be requested to show which AI tools you used for your assessment and the prompts you used to produce your work.
16+research: UWA research-writing guidance states that AI and other machine-learning language models cannot be authors, and authors should transparently disclose when and how they used them.
17+Evidence (en, b575b9aa7fab): AI and other machine learning language models cannot be authors. Authors should be transparent when AI and other machine learning language models are used and provide information about how they were used.
18+research: UWA research-writing guidance says authors are responsible for ensuring inputs to AI tools are suitable for uploading and processing and that use complies with copyright, privacy, ethics, data-sensitivity policies, and legislation.
19+Evidence (en, b575b9aa7fab): Authors are responsible for ensuring that all input into AI tools is suitable for uploading and processing and any use is compliant with copyright, privacy, ethics, and data sensitivity policies and legislation.
20+ai_tool_treatment: UWA askUWA guidance says limited AI editorial tools may be used for broad editorial assistance in a student's own writing, and the student remains responsible for judging whether suggestions are accurate and appropriate.
21+Evidence (en-AU, a3893eb59dc4): Under UWA's Academic Integrity policy, you are permitted to limited use of AI tools for broad editorial assistance in your writing. This means that you can use spelling, grammar and style checkers for basic feedback on your own written work.

Claim changes

11 claim records

privacy

UWA Library ethical guidance says users should never upload the University's intellectual property into a generative AI tool unless explicitly instructed to do so.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UWA research-writing guidance says authors are responsible for ensuring inputs to AI tools are suitable for uploading and processing and that use complies with copyright, privacy, ethics, data-sensitivity policies, and legislation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UWA research-writing guidance states that AI and other machine-learning language models cannot be authors, and authors should transparently disclose when and how they used them.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

UWA has blocked DeepSeek services on UWA-managed devices and networks because of concerns about the safety and security of data shared with DeepSeek's online services.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

privacy

UWA's 2026 student AI guide says students should not enter personal data or information into public AI systems.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

UWA askUWA guidance tells students to reference all AI-generated content used in assessments and says they may be asked to show the AI tools and prompts used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

ai_tool_treatment

UWA askUWA guidance says limited AI editorial tools may be used for broad editorial assistance in a student's own writing, and the student remains responsible for judging whether suggestions are accurate and appropriate.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

UWA's Academic Integrity Policy includes using material generated by Artificial Intelligence, including generative AI and related tools, in assessments as a type of plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

For UWA assessments assigned Tier 1, students are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment, and any AI use during that Tier 1 assessment is treated as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

ai_tool_treatment

UWA student assessment guidance describes three AI-use tiers that lecturers may apply to assessment tasks: Tier 1 no AI, Tier 2 AI assistance or collaboration, and Tier 3 fully embedded AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

ai_tool_treatment

For UWA coursework assessments, AI tools may only be used where the Unit Coordinator explicitly permits them; permitted use must be cited, referenced, and clearly acknowledged.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

Source snapshots

9 source attributions