Ann Arbor, United States 上次查核時間

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

獨立 · 開放存取 · 非官方大學頁面

您想檢查什麼?

搜尋大學

依主題探索目前紀錄

課程作業

有條件

授課教師依課程、評估與活動決定允許的生成式 AI 用途,並須與學院的違規行為政策一致。請閱讀課程大綱與任務說明。已公布的允許、限制及禁止範例僅為範本,並非全校通用規定。

官方來源 ↗

考試

不明確

請遵循特定考試及學院的指示。目前重新擷取的指引確立了評量層級的授課教師權限,但並未重新驗證確切的考試授權。在來源存取失敗後,Rackham 明確許可的主張仍保留待定。

官方來源 ↗

披露

建議

大學原則倡導適當揭露並註明出處。請遵循實際課程的規定;範例揭露附錄或禁令並非自動在密西根大學(U-M)全面具有強制性。

官方來源 ↗

隱私與資料

受限

請使用經核准的服務,並核對每類獲准的資料類型;未與密西根大學(U-M)簽約的外部服務,應僅接收低級別機構資料。「不用於模型訓練」並不代表不會處理提示、歷史紀錄或日誌,亦不代表不會與供應商共享。統一的保留期限,以及經驗證的敏感資料對照表,目前仍未確定。

官方來源 ↗

工具與存取權限

有條件

ITS 為 U-M 的現有使用者提供 U-M GPT、Maizey 與 GPT Toolkit,並受僅限美國的條款約束。Google 資格排除受贊助的附屬人員、校友及退休人員。工具存取權、資料核准與評量許可乃屬不同事項。

官方來源 ↗

研究與出版

建議

研究中應秉持誠信、適當引註及人類負責的原則。OVPR 不鼓勵以生成式 AI 進行同儕審查,並強烈不鼓勵將他人的研究計畫申請書上傳至商業工具。其關於安全工具語言與表達清晰度的例外規定及資助方條件仍然有效。HRPP/Rackham 相關主張暫予保留。

官方來源 ↗
更多已審閱的紀錄主題

學術誠信

受限

文理學院(LSA)區分了教師處置與學術誠信處(SAA)處置,在審理期間推定無責任,並允許答辯/由支援人員陪同。課程與學院的結果有所不同。LSA 申訴期限為處置信開立之日起兩週內。未取代 Rackham 的個別申訴時效;偵測器產出為調查依據,非確證。

官方來源 ↗

教學指引

建議

密西根大學(U-M)不建議使用不可靠的 AI 偵測工具;此並非禁令。授課教師應明確訂定課程規則。護理學院指引指出,AI 不應作為唯一評分依據,涉及可識別身分之學生作業時,須使用經核准的服務或用途;請勿將此單位規則擴大適用於全校。

官方來源 ↗

安全與採購

受限

人工審查 AI 生成的程式碼;對所有新應用或重大變更應用程式採用經過專業培訓的同儕審查,特別是高度/受限(High/Restricted)資料。Procurement Services 應為處理中度/高度/受限(Moderate/High/Restricted)資料之機構級 AI 的唯一買方。各項服務的核准仍屬獨立事項。

官方來源 ↗

提交前

應做事項

  • 請查閱實際的課程與考核規則。
    本站建議
  • 請遵循作業的披露要求,並適當註明出處。
    來源指引
  • 就 LSA 而言,申訴期限自決定書日期起算。
    本範圍要求

請勿

  • 不要把服務取用權限當成評量許可。
    本站建議
  • 請勿將「不用於訓練」等同於「無歷史紀錄或日誌」。
    本站建議
  • 避免將其他研究人員的研究計畫書上傳至商業AI。
    來源指引

AI 使用受到質疑?

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

適用規定由課程、學院、服務單位與研究單位決定。LSA 的程序不能取代 Rackham 研究生院或其他學院的規定。

調查與回應

LSA 授課教師可對不屬嚴重、對該作業成績的影響不超過零分的事件,採用教師處理程序;亦可能適用補救作業。SAA 處理程序則適用於可能導致課程不及格或更嚴厲處分的情況、先前已有責任認定的情況,或偽造學術文件的情況。案件審理期間,學生推定不負責任,可繼續上課,不得退選或更改成績制;授課教師不得施加懲罰或補救作業。學期末仍在審理中的案件可能被記為 NR,並導致無法取得課程學分或畢業。

原始證據與範圍

LSA 授課教師可對不屬嚴重、對該作業成績的影響不超過零分的事件,採用教師處理程序;亦可能適用補救作業。SAA 處理程序則適用於可能導致課程不及格或更嚴厲處分的情況、先前已有責任認定的情況,或偽造學術文件的情況。案件審理期間,學生推定不負責任,可繼續上課,不得退選或更改成績制;授課教師不得施加懲罰或補救作業。學期末仍在審理中的案件可能被記為 NR,並導致無法取得課程學分或畢業。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-routes

僅限 LSA 發布的程序;非 Rackham 或所有學院。

An instructor within LSA who believes academic misconduct has occurred may choose either Instructor Resolution: Resolve the matter directly with the student Appropriate when: the incident is not egregious and merits no consequence greater than a zero on the assignment, though the student may be required to do additional, remedial work (e.g., rewrite a paper). SAA Resolution: File a complaint to the Office of Student Academic Affairs, who will resolve the case.  Appropriate when: the sanction may result in the student failing the course or more severe sanction, the student has a previous finding of responsibility, or the student is suspected of falsifying or misrepresenting academic documents

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 0–700

大學官方來源 ↗
. Examples of academic misconduct include, but are not limited to: cheating, plagiarism, inappropriate collaboration, falsification of data, records, or documents, and aiding and abetting dishonesty. Deadlines: The complaint for any alleged instance of academic misconduct should be filed as soon as practical from the date of occurrence and should be submitted within 2 months of the date of the incident. Privacy: Materials related to a formal complaint of academic misconduct or an instructor's report of a resolution will be maintained by the Office of Student Academic Affairs in compliance with the privacy expectations under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). While a mis

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 700–1400

大學官方來源 ↗
conduct case is pending, with either Instruction Resolution or SAA Resolution: The student is presumed to not be responsible for the alleged misconduct and the student may continue to attend class and receive grades. The instructor may NOT impose any penalty or require any remedial work until the case has been resolved. The student may NOT change registration in the course (e.g. drop the course or change the grading option to Pass/Fail). If the term ends and a final grade must be reported while a case is pending, the instructor should use the grade NR (No Report). NR is a temporary, neutral grade that may be used in special circumstances where a final grade is not yet able to be reported. Th

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 1400–2100

大學官方來源 ↗
e student may not receive credit for the course in which the alleged misconduct occurred and may not graduate. Note: Students found responsible for academic misconduct with either resolution are not eligible to drop or choose pass/fail grading for the course.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 2100–2359

大學官方來源 ↗

根據 LSA SAA 決議,學術誠信協調員或其指定人員依優勢證據標準作出裁定。學生會收到指控及證據,並可作出回應、提出資料及提問。學生偕同支援人員出席時,宜通知 SAA。一般榮譽委員會的參與成員既不支持也不反對學生。

原始證據與範圍

根據 LSA SAA 決議,學術誠信協調員或其指定人員依優勢證據標準作出裁定。學生會收到指控及證據,並可作出回應、提出資料及提問。學生偕同支援人員出席時,宜通知 SAA。一般榮譽委員會的參與成員既不支持也不反對學生。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-investigation

僅限 LSA 發布的程序;非 Rackham 或所有學院。

What an SAA Resolution is A faculty or staff member within LSA who believes academic misconduct has occurred may file a formal complaint of academic misconduct with the LSA Office of Student Academic Affairs who will determine if misconduct has occurred. Important: The instructor should not impose any penalty or require remedial work until the case has been resolved. Once a case has been filed with the Office of Student Academic Affairs, it may not be withdrawn without the approval of the Assistant Dean. Barring unforeseen circumstances, cases will be resolved within the academic term (and typically within three weeks) in which the incident occurs. SAA Resolution Procedures Reporting academi

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 0–700

大學官方來源 ↗
c misconduct Instructor reports a possible case of academic misconduct to SAA using the Report of Suspected Misconduct form Prior to the Academic Misconduct Meeting SAA sends an email to the student stating that an instructor has reported what they believe to be a possible case of academic misconduct. The email also includes a link to set up an Academic Misconduct Meeting.  Once an appointment is scheduled, SAA sends a confirmation email which contains evidence about the allegations of misconduct.  The Academic Misconduct Meeting will determine whether the student is responsible, or not, for the alleged misconduct. An accused student should prepare for the Academic Misconduct Meeting by revi

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 700–1400

大學官方來源 ↗
ewing the information provided, asking any clarifying questions, and show up ready to present any of their own relevant information, read any statement, and/or ask further questions.  During the Academic Misconduct Meeting The Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee will describe the allegations made, detail the supporting evidence, and review the range of college-level sanctions (e.g. disciplinary probation, suspension, or expulsion). This is an opportunity for the student to be heard and to present their side of the incident. The student should be ready to present any relevant material, read a statement, and/or ask questions. Typically, in each meeting a representative of the LSA Stu

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 1400–2100

大學官方來源 ↗
dent Honor Council participates, though they do not advocate for or against the student. Students should notify the Office of Student Academic Affairs if they will have a support person in attendance at the meeting. In certain circumstances, the Coordinator of Academic Integrity may give the student the opportunity to ask questions of the accusing party, either by exchanging written questions or by asking questions during a subsequent meeting. This additional step will be completed prior to the Coordinator or designee’s final decision. The meeting between the accused student and the Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee may be virtual or in-person. Making a decision The Coordinator o

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 2100–2800

大學官方來源 ↗
f Academic Integrity or designee determines whether a violation of the LSA Community Expectations of Academic Integrity has occurred and if the student is responsible for academic misconduct. The standard of review is preponderance. This means that the student is not considered responsible unless the evidence demonstrates that it is "more likely than not" that academic misconduct has occurred. The student will be informed by letter, with an email copy to the instructor(s), of the decision and sanction(s), if any, to be imposed. If a student is found not responsible for academic misconduct, the instructor(s) will grade the student accordingly.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 2800–3450

大學官方來源 ↗

可能的結果

在 LSA,課程成績扣分依循授課教師的課程大綱/系所政策;SAA 可施加學院處分,包括察看處分、反思報告、停學或開除學籍。這些只是可能的結果,並非自動的 AI 懲罰。

原始證據與範圍

在 LSA,課程成績扣分依循授課教師的課程大綱/系所政策;SAA 可施加學院處分,包括察看處分、反思報告、停學或開除學籍。這些只是可能的結果,並非自動的 AI 懲罰。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-outcomes

僅限 LSA 發布的程序;非 Rackham 或所有學院。

If a student is found responsible for academic misconduct: Course-level sanctions: appropriate grade penalties for the misconduct will be left up to the instructor based on syllabus grade policies or department policies, if applicable. College-level sanctions: The student may be assigned college sanctions by the Office of Student Academic Affairs. Examples of these sanctions include:  Disciplinary probation - students are placed on probation for one year. As part of this process, a notation is placed on the student's unofficial transcript. This notation serves as a warning and reprimand that the student has been found responsible for academic misconduct. After that one year period, the notat

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 680–686; characters 19107–20495; excerpt offset 0–700

大學官方來源 ↗
ion is removed provided no further violations of academic misconduct have occurred. Reflective Essay - the student must write an essay about their experience, share what they have learned from it, and discuss how they intend to incorporate LSA Community Expectations into their personal and academic life moving forward. Suspension - the student is ineligible to enroll at the university for one semester and a permanent notation is added to their transcript. In order to re-enroll in future terms, the student must write a petition for reactivation at least two weeks prior to the start of the term they wish to enroll. Expulsion - The student is permanently removed from the university.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 680–686; characters 19107–20495; excerpt offset 700–1388

大學官方來源 ↗

針對修習 LSA 課程之其他學院學生,由 SAA 判定課程誠信違規情事及授課教師之課程處分權限;該學生的原所屬學院則負責施予院級處分,包含採納所提出的各項建議處分。

原始證據與範圍

針對修習 LSA 課程之其他學院學生,由 SAA 判定課程誠信違規情事及授課教師之課程處分權限;該學生的原所屬學院則負責施予院級處分,包含採納所提出的各項建議處分。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-cross-school

僅限 LSA 發布的程序;非 Rackham 或所有學院。

If a student registered in another school is accused of misconduct in an LSA course: SAA's authority includes deciding whether or not the alleged action is a violation of Academic Integrity and whether course-level sanctions may be applied if the student is found responsible for misconduct. Course-level sanctions are left up to the instructor. SAA will recommend a sanction or sanctions to the School or College in which the student is registered, but that School or College has the responsibility for imposing any recommendation or additional sanction it determines appropriate.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 729–732; characters 23599–24180; excerpt offset 0–581

大學官方來源 ↗

審核與申訴

經認定負責的 LSA 學生,可自決議函之日起兩週內,向學術司法委員會提交書面申訴,對責任認定、學院處分或兩者提出異議。申訴理由包括嚴重程序錯誤、先前無法取得的重要證據,或學院處分過重。申訴期間處分仍然有效。涉及歧視或禁止行為的指控,也必須送交 ECRT,並暫停申訴程序。學術司法委員會可推翻責任認定,或建議維持、減輕或加重處分。

原始證據與範圍

經認定負責的 LSA 學生,可自決議函之日起兩週內,向學術司法委員會提交書面申訴,對責任認定、學院處分或兩者提出異議。申訴理由包括嚴重程序錯誤、先前無法取得的重要證據,或學院處分過重。申訴期間處分仍然有效。涉及歧視或禁止行為的指控,也必須送交 ECRT,並暫停申訴程序。學術司法委員會可推翻責任認定,或建議維持、減輕或加重處分。

umich-local-20261022-lsa-appeal

僅限 LSA 發布的程序;非 Rackham 或所有學院。

A student who has been found responsible for academic misconduct may submit a written appeal to the LSA Academic Judiciary Committee (AJC), a committee composed of both undergraduate students and faculty members from the College of LSA. Note: If students submit an appeal request, college- and course-level sanctions remain in place while it is pending. If an appeal is based on discrimination or other prohibited behavior, students must also file a report with the Equity, Civil Rights & Title IX Office (ECRT). The appeal process will pause until that matter is resolved. Procedures The student must submit an appeal within two weeks from the date of the resolution letter. The appeal must state wh

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 0–700

大學官方來源 ↗
at is being appealed: the finding of academic misconduct, the college sanction imposed, or both. The appeal must also state and describe in detail at least one of the following grounds for appeal: The procedure was violated in a way that seriously compromised the investigation and/or conclusions. There is significant new evidence not reasonably available at the time of the meeting with the Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee. The college sanctions are excessive relative to the violation. Appeals are not granted unless one or more of the above criteria are met and supported by evidence.  Making a decision A member of the AJC will decide whether the appeal has sufficient grounds to m

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 700–1400

大學官方來源 ↗
ove forward. If it does not, the appeal process ends and the Office of Student Academic Affairs' decision stands. There is no further appeal opportunity. If it is determined that grounds for an appeal have been met, a panel of AJC members will review your case alongside evidence from the instructor and documentation of how the Office of Student Academic Affairs reached its decision. After reviewing the appeal, the AJC may: Reverse the finding of responsibility (overturn the original decision), or Uphold the finding of responsibility. If it's upheld, the Committee may recommend that the Office of Student Affairs keep the sanction as is, reduce it, or increase it. Students will be notified of

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 1400–2100

大學官方來源 ↗
the outcome by email.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 2100–2121

大學官方來源 ↗

AI工具與存取

These tools have audience, account, mode or purpose limits; access is not established for all students and does not grant assessment permission. Check each access condition.

  • Google Gemini機構存取/授權適用條件

    符合資格的 U-M Google 帳戶,透過 gemini.google.com 使用;僅適用美國條款。

  • Google Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM)機構存取/授權適用條件

    符合資格的密西根大學(U-M)Google 帳號,透過 notebook.google.com 使用;僅適用美國條款。

  • U-M GPT機構存取/授權適用條件

    機構登入;目前確切的使用權限未經驗證。

  • U-M GPT Toolkit機構存取/授權適用條件

    請依循 ITS Toolkit 入門流程;API 憑證尚未經測試。

  • U-M Maizey機構存取/授權適用條件

    請使用機構的入職指引;每個數據集的權限須經核實。

  • Adobe Firefly機構存取/授權適用條件

    符合資格的教職員/職員/學生使用大學企業 Adobe 管道。

紀錄更新最近90天 · 已記錄的更新:2

此為本網站已審查紀錄的更新,並不代表大學已變更其政策。

  1. 頁面更新

    其他紀錄 · 頁面更新

    檢視修訂版本

    正在載入修訂版本…

  2. 已保留/已移出目前結論 · 新增紀錄 · 網站更正

    課程作業 · 考試 · 另有 8 個主題 · Records involved: 27 (13 corrected / adjusted · 13 added · 1 held)

    檢視修訂版本

    正在載入修訂版本…

已審查的聲明

26

暫緩結論與歷史證據 (1)

這些原始紀錄及先前審核狀態僅為追溯來源而保留,不代表目前的許可、義務或具體期限。

Google NotebookLM is listed for University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

目前狀態:暫緩;歷史審核狀態: agent_reviewed

cl-university-of-michigan-ann-arbor-notebooklm-254

U-M's official AI Tools page says Google NotebookLM is an AI-powered research and note-taking assistant available to all University of Michigan faculty, staff, and students.

官方來源

13 個官方網址;13 項來源出處及其擷取版本已保留。

Appropriate Use of AI Services & U-M Policy

genai.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

Appropriate Use of AI Services & U-M Policy · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878427Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

7b24037815ac2e0d6673a6e6b4b66890c1755fc7a59b336eb5e247ef34e57821

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

AI Tools | U-M Generative AI

genai.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

AI Tools | U-M Generative AI · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878781Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

6a1bd7d2d0659d50d6e03b3ff8ba18e64e75e28cafbb67de400c22e62357b74a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

ITS AI Services

its.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

ITS AI Services · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878868Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

9777508b3bf9712d54d2f8e48999096c557270032f8cbf94d13a4389b916929a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

U-M Guidance for Faculty/Instructors

genai.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

U-M Guidance for Faculty/Instructors · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878938Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

4ab93d5e509ed9a9ef25039f8f8c62e70b0f55e93f11478e8d9cfdc6b435e705

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Course Policies & Syllabi Statements

genai.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

Course Policies & Syllabi Statements · 2026-10-23T01:39:15.252727Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a40033e2b1bca5d6fd5a8c5f30bcfb526fefb99a45e72d9d9868f7b61ed00e7e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

U-M Guidance for Students

genai.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

U-M Guidance for Students · 2026-10-23T01:39:16.500949Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

1ae5f5b3ac8bac3633bc9f0fd2528be969e03b2e1c0915eb444a82f149c84f07

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Procedures for Resolving Violations of Academic Integrity - LSA

lsa.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

Procedures for Resolving Violations of Academic Integrity - LSA · 2026-10-23T01:39:16.944292Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

5e4b4638287da2b552656263a5ff04548e64b79ad9128c9e9547991cc9afe25e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Plagiarism Detection with Generative AI Tools - ITS

teamdynamix.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

Plagiarism Detection with Generative AI Tools - ITS · 2026-10-23T01:38:20.994164Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a955fb5487e4e140e4532ae5bacbdd855da2a027e56bdfa917c3a3687d502829

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Google Gemini & Gemini Notebook - ITS

its.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

Google Gemini & Gemini Notebook - ITS · 2026-10-23T01:39:17.719432Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

ccbf99e4ab4f329cd6dc2545a7a8c660b551dbe3bc7357f2166bcf752447aff9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

ITS AI Services Privacy Notice

its.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

ITS AI Services Privacy Notice · 2026-10-23T01:39:17.937877Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

83f5cc09e7ef3fe550e0261e0207c50c899cfd2d32dc65fca719de0ad152fa57

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

ITS AI Services Terms of Service

its.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

ITS AI Services Terms of Service · 2026-10-23T01:39:18.777426Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

eddbfedc797c82850a29078ea33519ca288b9689cc49526aabaf93fe715feb7f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

UMSN Faculty AI Reference Guide

teamdynamix.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

UMSN Faculty AI Reference Guide · 2026-10-23T01:38:21.265369Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

64912597152bcdeeadaad372249bb798fb5a8b8359e30be6fa05a0b5e6cb9864

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

OVPR Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Internal Peer Review

research.umich.edu

大學官方來源

雜湊值與擷取版本

OVPR Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Internal Peer Review · 2026-10-23T01:38:21.354357Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a9f9a5e7ab31c89aeb784a0907efafb14f549b9dd4252d6ec250537475af1966

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗
紀錄資訊、JSON 與引用格式

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
uq-hkust-michigan-v6-r4-20261022
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • 保留全部 63 個原始物件/14 個公開 ID/12 個歷史工具,維持 24 個原始剩餘索引鍵及原始保留的檢測器物件。未虛構提供的學生快照。
  • 限定 20 次常規請求,15 個替代項目各自至多 1 次。s13–s17 替代項目 429:資料指引、HRPP、研究、Rackham、招生未重新擷取。s26/s27 常規 403 且已知需要驗證;不予繞過。
  • 研究候選項04,05,06,07,10,13因其原始來源無法精確重新擷取而仍被保留;原始主張、研究摘錄及時間戳記均私下保存,不作為現行證據呈現。
  • 考試不明確:已擷取直接評估的權限,但未重新驗證任何具體考試規則。LSA 自決議函日期起兩週的期限,不得以不受約束的 Rackham 15 個工作日(自收到之日起算)取代。
  • 已擷取來源 13 項:原始未處理回應 3 項,以及明確標示為 Firecrawl 渲染 HTML 的來源 10 項(並非原始回應位元組)。49 項研究綁定,另加 11 項新增的有界語境綁定。
  • 統一的提示詞保留期間、各服務的敏感資料矩陣、論文/存檔、贊助者規則、合理調整措施以及所有學院的涵蓋範圍尚未解決。
  • 公開 APIs/MCP/搜尋/歷史/快照/通知保持不變;尚待獨立協調員語義驗收與發布授權。
        Current reviewed JSON
        學生提出的問題

        學生提出的問題

        我可以在課程作業中使用 AI 嗎?

        授課教師依課程、評估與活動決定允許的生成式 AI 用途,並須與學院的違規行為政策一致。請閱讀課程大綱與任務說明。已公布的允許、限制及禁止範例僅為範本,並非全校通用規定。

        檢視證據 →
        我需要揭露 AI 的使用嗎?

        大學原則倡導適當揭露並註明出處。請遵循實際課程的規定;範例揭露附錄或禁令並非自動在密西根大學(U-M)全面具有強制性。

        檢視證據 →
        我可以上傳敏感資料嗎?

        請使用經核准的服務,並核對每類獲准的資料類型;未與密西根大學(U-M)簽約的外部服務,應僅接收低級別機構資料。「不用於模型訓練」並不代表不會處理提示、歷史紀錄或日誌,亦不代表不會與供應商共享。統一的保留期限,以及經驗證的敏感資料對照表,目前仍未確定。

        檢視證據 →
        我可以存取哪些工具?

        ITS 為 U-M 的現有使用者提供 U-M GPT、Maizey 與 GPT Toolkit,並受僅限美國的條款約束。Google 資格排除受贊助的附屬人員、校友及退休人員。工具存取權、資料核准與評量許可乃屬不同事項。

        檢視證據 →
        考試規則是什麼?

        請遵循特定考試及學院的指示。目前重新擷取的指引確立了評量層級的授課教師權限,但並未重新驗證確切的考試授權。在來源存取失敗後,Rackham 明確許可的主張仍保留待定。

        檢視證據 →
        研究與出版適用哪些規定?

        研究中應秉持誠信、適當引註及人類負責的原則。OVPR 不鼓勵以生成式 AI 進行同儕審查,並強烈不鼓勵將他人的研究計畫申請書上傳至商業工具。其關於安全工具語言與表達清晰度的例外規定及資助方條件仍然有效。HRPP/Rackham 相關主張暫予保留。

        檢視證據 →
        什麼行為算是學術不端?

        文理學院(LSA)區分了教師處置與學術誠信處(SAA)處置,在審理期間推定無責任,並允許答辯/由支援人員陪同。課程與學院的結果有所不同。LSA 申訴期限為處置信開立之日起兩週內。未取代 Rackham 的個別申訴時效;偵測器產出為調查依據,非確證。

        檢視證據 →
        哪些指引適用於教學?

        密西根大學(U-M)不建議使用不可靠的 AI 偵測工具;此並非禁令。授課教師應明確訂定課程規則。護理學院指引指出,AI 不應作為唯一評分依據,涉及可識別身分之學生作業時,須使用經核准的服務或用途;請勿將此單位規則擴大適用於全校。

        檢視證據 →
        適用哪些安全與採購要求?

        人工審查 AI 生成的程式碼;對所有新應用或重大變更應用程式採用經過專業培訓的同儕審查,特別是高度/受限(High/Restricted)資料。Procurement Services 應為處理中度/高度/受限(Moderate/High/Restricted)資料之機構級 AI 的唯一買方。各項服務的核准仍屬獨立事項。

        檢視證據 →
        此紀錄何時經過核查?

        已核查紀錄:

        紀錄版本 →
        哪些官方來源支援這些規則?官方來源 →
        在哪裡可以閱讀完整證據?

        26 · 完整政策證據

        完整政策證據 →