Ann Arbor, United States Kali terakhir disemak

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

Bebas · Akses terbuka · Bukan halaman universiti rasmi

Apakah yang ingin anda semak?

Cari universiti

Terokai rekod semasa mengikut topik

Kerja kursus

Bersyarat

Pensyarah menentukan penggunaan GenAI yang dibenarkan mengikut kursus, penilaian dan aktiviti, selaras dengan dasar salah laku kolej. Baca silibus kursus dan arahan tugasan. Contoh dibenarkan/terhad/dilarang yang diterbitkan ialah templat, bukan peraturan universiti sejagat.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Peperiksaan

Tidak jelas

Ikuti arahan peperiksaan dan kolej yang khusus. Panduan semasa yang diperoleh semula menetapkan kuasa pengajar di peringkat penilaian, tetapi tiada kebenaran peperiksaan yang tepat disahkan semula. Tuntutan kebenaran nyata Rackham kekal ditahan selepas kegagalan akses kepada sumber.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Pendedahan

Disyorkan

Prinsip universiti menyeru pendedahan dan petikan yang sesuai. Ikut peraturan kursus sebenar; lampiran pendedahan contoh atau larangan tidak secara automatik wajib di seluruh U-M.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Privasi dan data

Terhad

Gunakan perkhidmatan yang diluluskan dan semak setiap jenis data yang dibenarkan; perkhidmatan luaran tanpa kontrak U-M sepatutnya hanya menerima data institusi Rendah. Tiada latihan model tidak bermakna tiada pemprosesan gesaan/sejarah/log atau perkongsian dengan vendor. Tempoh pengekalan seragam dan matriks data sensitif yang disahkan kekal belum diselesaikan.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Alat dan akses

Bersyarat

ITS menawarkan U-M GPT, Maizey dan GPT Toolkit untuk pengguna aktif U-M, tertakluk kepada terma khusus A.S. sahaja. Kelayakan Google mengecualikan ahli gabungan yang ditaja, alumni dan pesara. Akses alatan, kelulusan data dan kebenaran penilaian adalah berasingan.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Penyelidikan dan penerbitan

Disyorkan

Amalkan kejujuran, rujukan yang sesuai dan tanggungjawab manusia dalam penyelidikan. OVPR tidak menggalakkan penilaian rakan sebaya menggunakan GenAI dan sangat tidak menggalakkan muat naik permohonan geran penyelidik lain ke alat komersial. Pengecualian bahasa/kejelasan alat selamat dan syarat penaja masih berkuat kuasa. Dakwaan khusus HRPP/Rackham ditangguhkan.

Sumber rasmi ↗
Topik rekod disemak tambahan

Integriti akademik

Terhad

LSA membezakan Penyelesaian Pengajar dan SAA, menganggap tiada tanggungjawab sementara menunggu keputusan, dan membenarkan orang maklum balas/sokongan. Hasil kursus dan kolej berbeza. Rayuan LSA adalah dua minggu dari tarikh surat penyelesaian. Jam berasingan Rackham tidak digantikan; output pengesan ialah siasatan, bukan bukti.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Panduan pengajaran

Disyorkan

U-M tidak mengesyorkan pengesan AI yang tidak boleh dipercayai; ini bukan larangan. Pensyarah sebaiknya menjelaskan peraturan kursus dengan jelas. Panduan School of Nursing menyatakan bahawa AI sebaiknya tidak dijadikan satu-satunya asas penggredan, dan kerja pelajar yang boleh dikenal pasti memerlukan perkhidmatan atau penggunaan yang diluluskan; jangan lanjutkan peraturan unit ini ke seluruh kampus.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Keselamatan dan perolehan

Terhad

Semak kod janaan AI oleh manusia; gunakan semakan rakan sebaya yang dilatih secara profesional untuk semua aplikasi baharu/yang diubah secara ketara, terutamanya data Tinggi/Disekat. Procurement Services harus menjadi pembeli tunggal bagi AI institusi yang mengendalikan data Sederhana/Tinggi/Disekat. Kelulusan bagi setiap perkhidmatan kekal berasingan.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Sebelum anda menghantar

Lakukan

  • Semak peraturan kursus dan penilaian yang sebenar.
    Nasihat laman ini
  • Ikuti arahan pendedahan tugasan dan rujuk dengan betul.
    Panduan sumber
  • Bagi LSA, kira tempoh rayuan dari tarikh surat keputusan.
    Keperluan dalam skop ini

Jangan

  • Jangan jadikan akses perkhidmatan sebagai kebenaran penilaian.
    Nasihat laman ini
  • Jangan samakan tiada latihan dengan tiada sejarah atau log.
    Nasihat laman ini
  • Elakkan memuat naik cadangan penyelidik lain ke AI komersial.
    Panduan sumber

Penggunaan AI dipersoalkan?

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

Kursus, kolej, unit perkhidmatan dan unit penyelidikan menentukan peraturan yang terpakai. Prosedur LSA tidak menggantikan Rackham atau sekolah lain.

Siasatan & tindak balas

Pengajar LSA boleh menggunakan Resolusi Pengajar bagi insiden yang tidak serius yang tidak sepatutnya membawa akibat lebih besar daripada sifar pada tugasan tersebut; kerja pemulihan juga boleh dikenakan. Resolusi SAA sesuai untuk kemungkinan kegagalan kursus atau sekatan yang lebih berat, penemuan tanggungjawab sebelum ini, atau dokumen akademik yang dipalsukan. Semasa menunggu keputusan, pelajar dianggap tidak bertanggungjawab, boleh menghadiri kelas, tidak boleh menggugurkan kursus atau menukar pilihan penggredan, dan pengajar tidak dibenarkan mengenakan penalti atau kerja pemulihan. Kes akhir penggal yang belum selesai boleh menerima NR dan menghalang kredit kursus atau kelulusan.

Bukti asal dan skop

Pengajar LSA boleh menggunakan Resolusi Pengajar bagi insiden yang tidak serius yang tidak sepatutnya membawa akibat lebih besar daripada sifar pada tugasan tersebut; kerja pemulihan juga boleh dikenakan. Resolusi SAA sesuai untuk kemungkinan kegagalan kursus atau sekatan yang lebih berat, penemuan tanggungjawab sebelum ini, atau dokumen akademik yang dipalsukan. Semasa menunggu keputusan, pelajar dianggap tidak bertanggungjawab, boleh menghadiri kelas, tidak boleh menggugurkan kursus atau menukar pilihan penggredan, dan pengajar tidak dibenarkan mengenakan penalti atau kerja pemulihan. Kes akhir penggal yang belum selesai boleh menerima NR dan menghalang kredit kursus atau kelulusan.

umich-local-20261022-lsa-routes

Prosedur diterbitkan LSA sahaja; bukan Rackham atau setiap sekolah.

An instructor within LSA who believes academic misconduct has occurred may choose either Instructor Resolution: Resolve the matter directly with the student Appropriate when: the incident is not egregious and merits no consequence greater than a zero on the assignment, though the student may be required to do additional, remedial work (e.g., rewrite a paper). SAA Resolution: File a complaint to the Office of Student Academic Affairs, who will resolve the case.  Appropriate when: the sanction may result in the student failing the course or more severe sanction, the student has a previous finding of responsibility, or the student is suspected of falsifying or misrepresenting academic documents

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 0–700

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
. Examples of academic misconduct include, but are not limited to: cheating, plagiarism, inappropriate collaboration, falsification of data, records, or documents, and aiding and abetting dishonesty. Deadlines: The complaint for any alleged instance of academic misconduct should be filed as soon as practical from the date of occurrence and should be submitted within 2 months of the date of the incident. Privacy: Materials related to a formal complaint of academic misconduct or an instructor's report of a resolution will be maintained by the Office of Student Academic Affairs in compliance with the privacy expectations under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). While a mis

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 700–1400

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
conduct case is pending, with either Instruction Resolution or SAA Resolution: The student is presumed to not be responsible for the alleged misconduct and the student may continue to attend class and receive grades. The instructor may NOT impose any penalty or require any remedial work until the case has been resolved. The student may NOT change registration in the course (e.g. drop the course or change the grading option to Pass/Fail). If the term ends and a final grade must be reported while a case is pending, the instructor should use the grade NR (No Report). NR is a temporary, neutral grade that may be used in special circumstances where a final grade is not yet able to be reported. Th

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 1400–2100

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
e student may not receive credit for the course in which the alleged misconduct occurred and may not graduate. Note: Students found responsible for academic misconduct with either resolution are not eligible to drop or choose pass/fail grading for the course.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 595–609; characters 10379–12738; excerpt offset 2100–2359

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗

Dalam Resolusi LSA SAA, Penyelaras Integriti Akademik atau wakil yang ditetapkan membuat keputusan di bawah piawaian imbangan kebarangkalian. Pelajar menerima dakwaan dan bukti serta boleh memberikan maklum balas, mengemukakan bahan dan mengajukan soalan. Pelajar sebaiknya memaklumkan SAA apabila membawa individu sokongan. Peserta biasa Majlis Kehormatan tidak menyokong atau menentang pelajar.

Bukti asal dan skop

Dalam Resolusi LSA SAA, Penyelaras Integriti Akademik atau wakil yang ditetapkan membuat keputusan di bawah piawaian imbangan kebarangkalian. Pelajar menerima dakwaan dan bukti serta boleh memberikan maklum balas, mengemukakan bahan dan mengajukan soalan. Pelajar sebaiknya memaklumkan SAA apabila membawa individu sokongan. Peserta biasa Majlis Kehormatan tidak menyokong atau menentang pelajar.

umich-local-20261022-lsa-investigation

Prosedur diterbitkan LSA sahaja; bukan Rackham atau setiap sekolah.

What an SAA Resolution is A faculty or staff member within LSA who believes academic misconduct has occurred may file a formal complaint of academic misconduct with the LSA Office of Student Academic Affairs who will determine if misconduct has occurred. Important: The instructor should not impose any penalty or require remedial work until the case has been resolved. Once a case has been filed with the Office of Student Academic Affairs, it may not be withdrawn without the approval of the Assistant Dean. Barring unforeseen circumstances, cases will be resolved within the academic term (and typically within three weeks) in which the incident occurs. SAA Resolution Procedures Reporting academi

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 0–700

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
c misconduct Instructor reports a possible case of academic misconduct to SAA using the Report of Suspected Misconduct form Prior to the Academic Misconduct Meeting SAA sends an email to the student stating that an instructor has reported what they believe to be a possible case of academic misconduct. The email also includes a link to set up an Academic Misconduct Meeting.  Once an appointment is scheduled, SAA sends a confirmation email which contains evidence about the allegations of misconduct.  The Academic Misconduct Meeting will determine whether the student is responsible, or not, for the alleged misconduct. An accused student should prepare for the Academic Misconduct Meeting by revi

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 700–1400

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
ewing the information provided, asking any clarifying questions, and show up ready to present any of their own relevant information, read any statement, and/or ask further questions.  During the Academic Misconduct Meeting The Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee will describe the allegations made, detail the supporting evidence, and review the range of college-level sanctions (e.g. disciplinary probation, suspension, or expulsion). This is an opportunity for the student to be heard and to present their side of the incident. The student should be ready to present any relevant material, read a statement, and/or ask questions. Typically, in each meeting a representative of the LSA Stu

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 1400–2100

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
dent Honor Council participates, though they do not advocate for or against the student. Students should notify the Office of Student Academic Affairs if they will have a support person in attendance at the meeting. In certain circumstances, the Coordinator of Academic Integrity may give the student the opportunity to ask questions of the accusing party, either by exchanging written questions or by asking questions during a subsequent meeting. This additional step will be completed prior to the Coordinator or designee’s final decision. The meeting between the accused student and the Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee may be virtual or in-person. Making a decision The Coordinator o

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 2100–2800

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
f Academic Integrity or designee determines whether a violation of the LSA Community Expectations of Academic Integrity has occurred and if the student is responsible for academic misconduct. The standard of review is preponderance. This means that the student is not considered responsible unless the evidence demonstrates that it is "more likely than not" that academic misconduct has occurred. The student will be informed by letter, with an email copy to the instructor(s), of the decision and sanction(s), if any, to be imposed. If a student is found not responsible for academic misconduct, the instructor(s) will grade the student accordingly.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 658–679; characters 15656–19106; excerpt offset 2800–3450

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗

Hasil yang mungkin

Di LSA, penalti markah kursus mengikut silibus pengajar atau dasar jabatan; SAA boleh mengenakan sekatan kolej termasuk percubaan, esei reflektif, penggantungan atau pembuangan. Ini ialah kemungkinan hasil, bukan penalti AI automatik.

Bukti asal dan skop

Di LSA, penalti markah kursus mengikut silibus pengajar atau dasar jabatan; SAA boleh mengenakan sekatan kolej termasuk percubaan, esei reflektif, penggantungan atau pembuangan. Ini ialah kemungkinan hasil, bukan penalti AI automatik.

umich-local-20261022-lsa-outcomes

Prosedur diterbitkan LSA sahaja; bukan Rackham atau setiap sekolah.

If a student is found responsible for academic misconduct: Course-level sanctions: appropriate grade penalties for the misconduct will be left up to the instructor based on syllabus grade policies or department policies, if applicable. College-level sanctions: The student may be assigned college sanctions by the Office of Student Academic Affairs. Examples of these sanctions include:  Disciplinary probation - students are placed on probation for one year. As part of this process, a notation is placed on the student's unofficial transcript. This notation serves as a warning and reprimand that the student has been found responsible for academic misconduct. After that one year period, the notat

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 680–686; characters 19107–20495; excerpt offset 0–700

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
ion is removed provided no further violations of academic misconduct have occurred. Reflective Essay - the student must write an essay about their experience, share what they have learned from it, and discuss how they intend to incorporate LSA Community Expectations into their personal and academic life moving forward. Suspension - the student is ineligible to enroll at the university for one semester and a permanent notation is added to their transcript. In order to re-enroll in future terms, the student must write a petition for reactivation at least two weeks prior to the start of the term they wish to enroll. Expulsion - The student is permanently removed from the university.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 680–686; characters 19107–20495; excerpt offset 700–1388

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗

Bagi pelajar fakulti lain dalam kursus LSA, SAA menentukan pelanggaran integriti kursus dan kuasa sekatan kursus pengajar; fakulti asal pelajar mengenakan sekatan kolej, termasuk sebarang cadangan yang diterimanya.

Bukti asal dan skop

Bagi pelajar fakulti lain dalam kursus LSA, SAA menentukan pelanggaran integriti kursus dan kuasa sekatan kursus pengajar; fakulti asal pelajar mengenakan sekatan kolej, termasuk sebarang cadangan yang diterimanya.

umich-local-20261022-lsa-cross-school

Prosedur diterbitkan LSA sahaja; bukan Rackham atau setiap sekolah.

If a student registered in another school is accused of misconduct in an LSA course: SAA's authority includes deciding whether or not the alleged action is a violation of Academic Integrity and whether course-level sanctions may be applied if the student is found responsible for misconduct. Course-level sanctions are left up to the instructor. SAA will recommend a sanction or sanctions to the School or College in which the student is registered, but that School or College has the responsibility for imposing any recommendation or additional sanction it determines appropriate.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 729–732; characters 23599–24180; excerpt offset 0–581

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗

Semakan & rayuan

Pelajar LSA yang didapati bertanggungjawab boleh menyerahkan rayuan bertulis kepada Jawatankuasa Kehakiman Akademik dalam tempoh dua minggu dari tarikh surat resolusi, mencabar tanggungjawab, sekatan kolej, atau kedua-duanya. Alasan termasuk ralat prosedur yang serius, bukti penting yang sebelum ini tidak tersedia, atau sekatan kolej yang berlebihan. Sekatan kekal semasa rayuan. Dakwaan diskriminasi atau tingkah laku yang dilarang mesti juga dikemukakan kepada ECRT dan menggantung rayuan buat sementara. AJC boleh membatalkan tanggungjawab atau mengesyorkan supaya sekatan dikekalkan, dikurangkan atau ditingkatkan.

Bukti asal dan skop

Pelajar LSA yang didapati bertanggungjawab boleh menyerahkan rayuan bertulis kepada Jawatankuasa Kehakiman Akademik dalam tempoh dua minggu dari tarikh surat resolusi, mencabar tanggungjawab, sekatan kolej, atau kedua-duanya. Alasan termasuk ralat prosedur yang serius, bukti penting yang sebelum ini tidak tersedia, atau sekatan kolej yang berlebihan. Sekatan kekal semasa rayuan. Dakwaan diskriminasi atau tingkah laku yang dilarang mesti juga dikemukakan kepada ECRT dan menggantung rayuan buat sementara. AJC boleh membatalkan tanggungjawab atau mengesyorkan supaya sekatan dikekalkan, dikurangkan atau ditingkatkan.

umich-local-20261022-lsa-appeal

Prosedur diterbitkan LSA sahaja; bukan Rackham atau setiap sekolah.

A student who has been found responsible for academic misconduct may submit a written appeal to the LSA Academic Judiciary Committee (AJC), a committee composed of both undergraduate students and faculty members from the College of LSA. Note: If students submit an appeal request, college- and course-level sanctions remain in place while it is pending. If an appeal is based on discrimination or other prohibited behavior, students must also file a report with the Equity, Civil Rights & Title IX Office (ECRT). The appeal process will pause until that matter is resolved. Procedures The student must submit an appeal within two weeks from the date of the resolution letter. The appeal must state wh

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 0–700

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
at is being appealed: the finding of academic misconduct, the college sanction imposed, or both. The appeal must also state and describe in detail at least one of the following grounds for appeal: The procedure was violated in a way that seriously compromised the investigation and/or conclusions. There is significant new evidence not reasonably available at the time of the meeting with the Coordinator of Academic Integrity or designee. The college sanctions are excessive relative to the violation. Appeals are not granted unless one or more of the above criteria are met and supported by evidence.  Making a decision A member of the AJC will decide whether the appeal has sufficient grounds to m

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 700–1400

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
ove forward. If it does not, the appeal process ends and the Office of Student Academic Affairs' decision stands. There is no further appeal opportunity. If it is determined that grounds for an appeal have been met, a panel of AJC members will review your case alongside evidence from the instructor and documentation of how the Office of Student Academic Affairs reached its decision. After reviewing the appeal, the AJC may: Reverse the finding of responsibility (overturn the original decision), or Uphold the finding of responsibility. If it's upheld, the Committee may recommend that the Office of Student Affairs keep the sanction as is, reduce it, or increase it. Students will be notified of

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 1400–2100

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗
the outcome by email.

Captured source text; bounded full context, actual line range recorded; Extracted text SHA256 b2885e1102d81d8af676f334ee328a4c4b37125f32ddf7ec1e4df0f47c8e9076; original binding lines 700–716; characters 21382–23503; excerpt offset 2100–2121

Sumber rasmi universiti ↗

Alat AI dan akses

These tools have audience, account, mode or purpose limits; access is not established for all students and does not grant assessment permission. Check each access condition.

  • Google GeminiAkses institusi / lesenTertakluk pada syarat

    Akaun Google U-M yang layak melalui gemini.google.com; terma khusus AS sahaja.

  • Google Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM)Akses institusi / lesenTertakluk pada syarat

    Akaun Google U-M yang layak melalui notebook.google.com; syarat untuk Amerika Syarikat sahaja.

  • U-M GPTAkses institusi / lesenTertakluk pada syarat

    Log masuk institusi; kelayakan semasa yang tepat belum disahkan.

  • U-M GPT ToolkitAkses institusi / lesenTertakluk pada syarat

    Ikuti proses pengenalan ITS Toolkit; bukti kelayakan API belum diuji.

  • U-M MaizeyAkses institusi / lesenTertakluk pada syarat

    Gunakan orientasi institusi; kebenaran bagi setiap set data mesti disemak.

  • Adobe FireflyAkses institusi / lesenTertakluk pada syarat

    Fakulti/kakitangan/pelajar yang layak menggunakan saluran Adobe perusahaan universiti.

Kemas kini rekod90 hari lalu · 2 kemas kini direkodkan

Kemas kini rekod yang disemak di laman ini tidak mengesahkan perubahan dasar universiti.

  1. Kemas kini halaman

    Rekod lain · Kemas kini halaman

    Lihat semakan

    Memuatkan semakan…

  2. Ditangguh / dikeluarkan · Penambahan rekod · Pembetulan laman

    Kerja kursus · Peperiksaan · 8 topik lagi · 27 rekod terlibat (13 dibetulkan / diselaraskan · 13 ditambah · 1 ditangguh)

    Lihat semakan

    Memuatkan semakan…

Dakwaan yang disemak

26

Kesimpulan tertangguh dan bukti sejarah (1)

Rekod asal dan status semakan terdahulu ini disimpan untuk tujuan jejak asal-usul, bukan sebagai kebenaran, kewajipan atau tarikh akhir khusus yang berkuat kuasa kini.

Google NotebookLM is listed for University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Status semasa: ditangguhkan; status semakan terdahulu: agent_reviewed

cl-university-of-michigan-ann-arbor-notebooklm-254

U-M's official AI Tools page says Google NotebookLM is an AI-powered research and note-taking assistant available to all University of Michigan faculty, staff, and students.

Sumber rasmi

13 URL rasmi; 13 atribusi sumber dan versi tangkapannya dikekalkan.

Appropriate Use of AI Services & U-M Policy

genai.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

Appropriate Use of AI Services & U-M Policy · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878427Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

7b24037815ac2e0d6673a6e6b4b66890c1755fc7a59b336eb5e247ef34e57821

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

AI Tools | U-M Generative AI

genai.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

AI Tools | U-M Generative AI · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878781Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

6a1bd7d2d0659d50d6e03b3ff8ba18e64e75e28cafbb67de400c22e62357b74a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

ITS AI Services

its.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

ITS AI Services · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878868Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

9777508b3bf9712d54d2f8e48999096c557270032f8cbf94d13a4389b916929a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

U-M Guidance for Faculty/Instructors

genai.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

U-M Guidance for Faculty/Instructors · 2026-10-23T01:39:13.878938Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

4ab93d5e509ed9a9ef25039f8f8c62e70b0f55e93f11478e8d9cfdc6b435e705

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Course Policies & Syllabi Statements

genai.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

Course Policies & Syllabi Statements · 2026-10-23T01:39:15.252727Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a40033e2b1bca5d6fd5a8c5f30bcfb526fefb99a45e72d9d9868f7b61ed00e7e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

U-M Guidance for Students

genai.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

U-M Guidance for Students · 2026-10-23T01:39:16.500949Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

1ae5f5b3ac8bac3633bc9f0fd2528be969e03b2e1c0915eb444a82f149c84f07

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Procedures for Resolving Violations of Academic Integrity - LSA

lsa.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

Procedures for Resolving Violations of Academic Integrity - LSA · 2026-10-23T01:39:16.944292Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

5e4b4638287da2b552656263a5ff04548e64b79ad9128c9e9547991cc9afe25e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Plagiarism Detection with Generative AI Tools - ITS

teamdynamix.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

Plagiarism Detection with Generative AI Tools - ITS · 2026-10-23T01:38:20.994164Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a955fb5487e4e140e4532ae5bacbdd855da2a027e56bdfa917c3a3687d502829

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

Google Gemini & Gemini Notebook - ITS

its.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

Google Gemini & Gemini Notebook - ITS · 2026-10-23T01:39:17.719432Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

ccbf99e4ab4f329cd6dc2545a7a8c660b551dbe3bc7357f2166bcf752447aff9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

ITS AI Services Privacy Notice

its.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

ITS AI Services Privacy Notice · 2026-10-23T01:39:17.937877Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

83f5cc09e7ef3fe550e0261e0207c50c899cfd2d32dc65fca719de0ad152fa57

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

ITS AI Services Terms of Service

its.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

ITS AI Services Terms of Service · 2026-10-23T01:39:18.777426Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

eddbfedc797c82850a29078ea33519ca288b9689cc49526aabaf93fe715feb7f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

UMSN Faculty AI Reference Guide

teamdynamix.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

UMSN Faculty AI Reference Guide · 2026-10-23T01:38:21.265369Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

64912597152bcdeeadaad372249bb798fb5a8b8359e30be6fa05a0b5e6cb9864

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗

OVPR Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Internal Peer Review

research.umich.edu

Sumber rasmi universiti

Hash dan versi yang dirakam

OVPR Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Internal Peer Review · 2026-10-23T01:38:21.354357Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a9f9a5e7ab31c89aeb784a0907efafb14f549b9dd4252d6ec250537475af1966

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Sumber rasmi ↗
Maklumat rekod, JSON & petikan

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Semakan rekod
uq-hkust-michigan-v6-r4-20261022
Keluaran set data
public-release-20260924-002
Pembetulan diterbitkan
Ringkasan pelajar
Belum diterbitkan
JSON semasa disemak · Asas sejarah

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Semua 63 objek asal/14 ID awam/12 alatan sejarah dikekalkan, 24 kunci asal yang tinggal dan objek pengesan yang dipegang asal dipelihara. Tiada snapshot pelajar yang dibekalkan direka.
  • Terhad 20 permintaan biasa, 15 alternatif paling banyak sekali setiap satu. s13–s17 alternatif 429: panduan data, HRPP, penyelidikan, Rackham, kemasukan tidak diambil semula. s26/s27 biasa 403 dan diketahui disahkan; tiada pintasan.
  • Calon penyelidikan04,05,06,07,10,13 kekal ditahan kerana pengambilan semula sumber yang tepat gagal; tuntutan asal, petikan penyelidikan dan pemasa disimpan secara peribadi, dan tidak diunjurkan sebagai bukti semasa.
  • Peperiksaan tidak jelas: kuasa penilaian langsung ditangkap tetapi tiada peraturan peperiksaan khusus disahkan semula. LSA dua minggu dari TARIKH surat penyelesaian tidak boleh digantikan dengan Rackham15 hari bekerja tanpa batas selepas PENERIMAAN.
  • 13 sumber ditangkap: 3 respons mentah asal dan 10 sumber HTML yang dipaparkan Firecrawl dan dilabel secara jelas, bukan bait respons asal. 49 ikatan penyelidikan serta 11 ikatan konteks terhad yang baharu.
  • Tempoh pengekalan gesaan yang seragam, matriks data sensitif bagi setiap perkhidmatan, tesis/deposit, peraturan penaja, penyesuaian dan liputan semua kolej masih belum diselesaikan.
  • API awam/MCP/carian/sejarah/tangkapan/pemberitahuan tidak berubah; penerimaan semantik penyelaras bebas dan kebenaran penerbitan masih belum selesai.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Soalan lazim

        Soalan lazim

        Bolehkah saya menggunakan AI untuk tugasan?

        Pensyarah menentukan penggunaan GenAI yang dibenarkan mengikut kursus, penilaian dan aktiviti, selaras dengan dasar salah laku kolej. Baca silibus kursus dan arahan tugasan. Contoh dibenarkan/terhad/dilarang yang diterbitkan ialah templat, bukan peraturan universiti sejagat.

        Lihat bukti →
        Perlukah penggunaan AI didedahkan?

        Prinsip universiti menyeru pendedahan dan petikan yang sesuai. Ikut peraturan kursus sebenar; lampiran pendedahan contoh atau larangan tidak secara automatik wajib di seluruh U-M.

        Lihat bukti →
        Bolehkah data sensitif dimuat naik?

        Gunakan perkhidmatan yang diluluskan dan semak setiap jenis data yang dibenarkan; perkhidmatan luaran tanpa kontrak U-M sepatutnya hanya menerima data institusi Rendah. Tiada latihan model tidak bermakna tiada pemprosesan gesaan/sejarah/log atau perkongsian dengan vendor. Tempoh pengekalan seragam dan matriks data sensitif yang disahkan kekal belum diselesaikan.

        Lihat bukti →
        Alat manakah yang tersedia?

        ITS menawarkan U-M GPT, Maizey dan GPT Toolkit untuk pengguna aktif U-M, tertakluk kepada terma khusus A.S. sahaja. Kelayakan Google mengecualikan ahli gabungan yang ditaja, alumni dan pesara. Akses alatan, kelulusan data dan kebenaran penilaian adalah berasingan.

        Lihat bukti →
        Apakah peraturan peperiksaan?

        Ikuti arahan peperiksaan dan kolej yang khusus. Panduan semasa yang diperoleh semula menetapkan kuasa pengajar di peringkat penilaian, tetapi tiada kebenaran peperiksaan yang tepat disahkan semula. Tuntutan kebenaran nyata Rackham kekal ditahan selepas kegagalan akses kepada sumber.

        Lihat bukti →
        Apakah peraturan penyelidikan dan penerbitan?

        Amalkan kejujuran, rujukan yang sesuai dan tanggungjawab manusia dalam penyelidikan. OVPR tidak menggalakkan penilaian rakan sebaya menggunakan GenAI dan sangat tidak menggalakkan muat naik permohonan geran penyelidik lain ke alat komersial. Pengecualian bahasa/kejelasan alat selamat dan syarat penaja masih berkuat kuasa. Dakwaan khusus HRPP/Rackham ditangguhkan.

        Lihat bukti →
        Apakah yang dianggap salah laku akademik?

        LSA membezakan Penyelesaian Pengajar dan SAA, menganggap tiada tanggungjawab sementara menunggu keputusan, dan membenarkan orang maklum balas/sokongan. Hasil kursus dan kolej berbeza. Rayuan LSA adalah dua minggu dari tarikh surat penyelesaian. Jam berasingan Rackham tidak digantikan; output pengesan ialah siasatan, bukan bukti.

        Lihat bukti →
        Apakah panduan pengajaran?

        U-M tidak mengesyorkan pengesan AI yang tidak boleh dipercayai; ini bukan larangan. Pensyarah sebaiknya menjelaskan peraturan kursus dengan jelas. Panduan School of Nursing menyatakan bahawa AI sebaiknya tidak dijadikan satu-satunya asas penggredan, dan kerja pelajar yang boleh dikenal pasti memerlukan perkhidmatan atau penggunaan yang diluluskan; jangan lanjutkan peraturan unit ini ke seluruh kampus.

        Lihat bukti →
        Apakah syarat keselamatan dan perolehan?

        Semak kod janaan AI oleh manusia; gunakan semakan rakan sebaya yang dilatih secara profesional untuk semua aplikasi baharu/yang diubah secara ketara, terutamanya data Tinggi/Disekat. Procurement Services harus menjadi pembeli tunggal bagi AI institusi yang mengendalikan data Sederhana/Tinggi/Disekat. Kelulusan bagi setiap perkhidmatan kekal berasingan.

        Lihat bukti →
        Bilakah rekod ini disemak?

        Disemak:

        Versi →
        Sumber rasmi manakah menyokong peraturan ini?Sumber rasmi →
        Di mana boleh membaca bukti penuh?

        26 · Bukti lengkap

        Bukti lengkap →