Coursework & Assessment
Permitted by Default (Econ)
The Faculty of Economics says AI tools are permitted by default and supports their effective, ethical and transparent use. University-wide default permission is not established by this excerpt.
Moscow, Russia Last checked
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Compare universities
Selected universities1/4
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Independent · Open access · Not an official university page
What would you like to check?
Explore the current record by topic
Exams & In-Person Assessment
Instructor Restrictions Apply
Instructors possess explicit authority to restrict or completely ban AI tools in their discipline assessments or examinations.
AI Disclosure & Declarations
Explicit Declaration
The Faculty of Economics rules say a student using AI tools in their work must explicitly declare that use.
Privacy & Data Protection
Unverified Policy Gap
General university personal data consent applies to administrative data processing; specific policy restrictions on student input of personal data into generative AI are an unverified policy gap.
Approved AI Tools
Default Use Guidance
Faculty of Economics rules establish that the use of AI tools is permitted by default for learning tasks; centralized university-wide AI licensing or procurement is an unverified gap.
Research & Authorship
AI Generation Prohibited
The retained Moscow State University Herald editorial guidance says generative AI systems must not be used to create or edit research text.
More reviewed record topics
Academic Integrity
Instructor Expert Assessment
Regulations require that automated AI detection results cannot serve as the sole ground for academic dishonesty findings, requiring substantive instructor evaluation; formal disciplinary appeal procedures remain an unverified gap.
Teaching Practice
Reciprocal Faculty Transparency
Teaching guidance mandates reciprocal transparency: instructors utilizing AI to prepare teaching materials must also explicitly declare their use.
Security & Procurement
Pending Verification
Commercial procurement contracts and institutional software evaluation frameworks for AI tools were not retrieved in local crawl extractions.
Before you submit
Do
- Explicitly declare your use of AI tools in your work under the Faculty of Economics rules.
- Check AI-generated facts, citations and calculations before relying on them.
Don’t
- Do not assume permission applies to examinations where instructors have issued a ban.
- Do not use generative AI to create or edit research text under the retained Moscow State University Herald editorial guidance.
Tool discovery records: scope pending review
Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.
AI tools
Access conditions (discovery record)
The following discovery information is retained; currentness and complete eligibility remain unverified.
Discovery record and cited evidence
AI tool use is permitted by default; the faculty supports effective, ethical, and transparent AI use.
Official source ↗990dff9396c18ad48f3abe573c2396d2cd1d5f2fb86beb9d8696cda950c18a99
Record updates
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-28.
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
Reviewed claims
7
Academic Integrity 3 reviewed claims
Under the Economics Faculty rules, a student who uses AI tools for work must explicitly declare that use and identify the AI model, the parts of the work where AI was used, and the purposes and methods of use.
Reviewed
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Если студент использует инструменты ИИ при выполнении работы, то он должен явным образом это декларировать. Для декларирования использования ИИ должны быть указать: применяемая модель ИИ; части работы, в которых применялись инструменты ИИ; цели и способы применения ИИ.Localized display only
Students using AI for work must explicitly declare it and identify the model, affected work parts, and purposes and methods of use.
Evidence locator: Sections 2.1 and 2.1.1
The Economics Faculty rules place responsibility on students for correctness of facts, wording, citations, links, and interpretation of AI-assisted results, and treat unchecked use of AI results as an academic-ethics violation.
Reviewed
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Студент несет ответственность за корректность фактических данных, формулировок, цитат и ссылок, а также за интерпретацию результатов, полученных с использованием инструментов ИИ.Localized display only
The student is responsible for correctness of facts, wording, citations, links, and interpretation of AI-assisted results.
Evidence locator: Section 2.2.1
The Economics Faculty rules state that violating AI-tool rules is an academic-ethics violation; if improper AI use without real mastery is found, a teacher may annul the work result and report the violation to faculty administration.
Reviewed
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Нарушение правил применения инструментов ИИ является нарушением академической этики. При выявлении некорректного применения ИИ без реального освоения материала студентом преподаватель вправе аннулировать результаты работы.Localized display only
Violation of AI-tool rules is an academic-ethics violation; improper AI use without real mastery may allow the teacher to annul the work result.
Evidence locator: Sections 2.5 and 2.5.2
Teaching 2 reviewed claims
The Economics Faculty rules allow each teacher, within a discipline, to require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban, with restrictions recorded in the discipline's rating system and communicated by the first class.
Reviewed
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1преподаватель в рамках учебной дисциплины вправе: требовать предоставить не только ссылки на инструменты ИИ, но и детальные промпты; ограничить использование инструментов ИИ вплоть до полного запрета.Localized display only
Within a discipline, the teacher may require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban.
Evidence locator: Sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2
The Economics Faculty rules require teachers who use AI tools when creating materials or other work to explicitly declare that use, including the AI model, work parts, and purposes and methods of use.
Reviewed
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Если преподаватель использует инструменты ИИ при выполнении работы (создании материалов и др.), то он должен явным образом это декларировать.Localized display only
A teacher who uses AI tools when creating materials or other work must explicitly declare that use.
Evidence locator: Section 3.1
AI tool use 1 reviewed claim
The Economics Faculty rules say AI-tool use is permitted by default and that the faculty supports effective, ethical, and transparent AI use for course work, term papers, and final qualification works.
Reviewed
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1По умолчанию разрешено использование инструментов ИИ. Экономический факультет МГУ поддерживает студентов и работников в их эффективном, этичном и прозрачном использовании инструментов ИИ.Localized display only
AI tool use is permitted by default; the faculty supports effective, ethical, and transparent AI use.
Evidence locator: Section 1.2
Source Status 1 reviewed claim
Lomonosov Moscow State University's Economics Faculty has Russian-language rules defining general conditions for use of generative AI tools by students and employees in the faculty's educational process.
Reviewed
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Настоящие Правила определяют общие условия использования инструментов генеративного искусственного интеллекта (далее — ИИ) студентами и работниками экономического факультета МГУ.Localized display only
These Rules define general conditions for using generative AI tools by students and employees of the MSU Economics Faculty.
Evidence locator: Section 1.1
Official sources
5 official URLs; 5 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
ИИ в образовании
www.econ.msu.ru
University official source
econ.msu.ru
Hash and captured version
ИИ в образовании · 2026-05-14T04:36:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
ba0a9cadb4d953a68cea117e0cfa565e0944259fa9bcb98263e899fa5000eafb
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
ИИ в образовании: преподавателям
www.econ.msu.ru
University official source
econ.msu.ru
Hash and captured version
ИИ в образовании: преподавателям · 2026-05-14T04:36:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
15409c009943e7f5df96fa8a143c3150ff491974a60750851d945b9390580eb9
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
МГУ поддерживает внедрение ИИ в образовательные процессы
msu.ru
University official source
msu.ru
Hash and captured version
МГУ поддерживает внедрение ИИ в образовательные процессы · 2026-05-14T04:36:30.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
cacd52da33f2ab6a6d396942dc0639ba0582a6c9e94dca5acd3a52e5df1da9f1
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Правила применения инструментов искусственного интеллекта в учебном процессе на экономическом факультете МГУ
www.econ.msu.ru
University official source
econ.msu.ru
Hash and captured version
Правила применения инструментов искусственного интеллекта в учебном процессе на экономическом факультете МГУ · 2026-05-14T04:37:52.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
990dff9396c18ad48f3abe573c2396d2cd1d5f2fb86beb9d8696cda950c18a99
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Студентам
www.econ.msu.ru
University official source
econ.msu.ru
Hash and captured version
Студентам · 2026-05-14T04:38:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
81a704075a4e296393ffd52d151d373dea85de497f5005b6866c29fa7673289b
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Explore
Related university AI policy records
4 records
Record information, JSON & citation
Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.
- Claim review state
- agent_reviewed
- Analysis review state
- machine_candidate
- Record revision
- v6-qs101-120-presentation-20261028
- Dataset release
- public-release-20260924-002
- Correction published
- Student snapshot
- Not published
Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.
- Formal sanction outcome schedules and appeal procedures under MSU regulations are not fully evidenced by the instructor expert evaluation excerpt.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
The Faculty of Economics says AI tools are permitted by default and supports their effective, ethical and transparent use. University-wide default permission is not established by this excerpt.
View evidence →Do I need to disclose AI use?
The Faculty of Economics rules say a student using AI tools in their work must explicitly declare that use.
View evidence →Can I upload sensitive data?
General university personal data consent applies to administrative data processing; specific policy restrictions on student input of personal data into generative AI are an unverified policy gap.
View evidence →Which tools can I access?
Faculty of Economics rules establish that the use of AI tools is permitted by default for learning tasks; centralized university-wide AI licensing or procurement is an unverified gap.
View evidence →What are the examination rules?
Instructors possess explicit authority to restrict or completely ban AI tools in their discipline assessments or examinations.
View evidence →What rules apply to research and publication?
The retained Moscow State University Herald editorial guidance says generative AI systems must not be used to create or edit research text.
View evidence →What counts as academic misconduct?
Regulations require that automated AI detection results cannot serve as the sole ground for academic dishonesty findings, requiring substantive instructor evaluation; formal disciplinary appeal procedures remain an unverified gap.
View evidence →What guidance applies to teaching?
Teaching guidance mandates reciprocal transparency: instructors utilizing AI to prepare teaching materials must also explicitly declare their use.
View evidence →What security and procurement requirements apply?
Commercial procurement contracts and institutional software evaluation frameworks for AI tools were not retrieved in local crawl extractions.
View evidence →