Change log

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims7Sources5

University page Public JSON

Lomonosov Moscow State University currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Lomonosov Moscow State University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Under the Economics Faculty rules, a student who uses AI tools for work must explicitly declare that use and identify the AI model, the parts of the work where AI was used, and the purposes and methods of use.
3+Evidence (ru, 990dff9396c1): Если студент использует инструменты ИИ при выполнении работы, то он должен явным образом это декларировать. Для декларирования использования ИИ должны быть указать: применяемая модель ИИ; части работы, в которых применялись инструменты ИИ; цели и способы применения ИИ.
4+teaching: The Economics Faculty rules allow each teacher, within a discipline, to require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban, with restrictions recorded in the discipline's rating system and communicated by the first class.
5+Evidence (ru, 990dff9396c1): преподаватель в рамках учебной дисциплины вправе: требовать предоставить не только ссылки на инструменты ИИ, но и детальные промпты; ограничить использование инструментов ИИ вплоть до полного запрета.
6+source_status: Lomonosov Moscow State University's Economics Faculty has Russian-language rules defining general conditions for use of generative AI tools by students and employees in the faculty's educational process.
7+Evidence (ru, 990dff9396c1): Настоящие Правила определяют общие условия использования инструментов генеративного искусственного интеллекта (далее — ИИ) студентами и работниками экономического факультета МГУ.
8+academic_integrity: The Economics Faculty rules place responsibility on students for correctness of facts, wording, citations, links, and interpretation of AI-assisted results, and treat unchecked use of AI results as an academic-ethics violation.
9+Evidence (ru, 990dff9396c1): Студент несет ответственность за корректность фактических данных, формулировок, цитат и ссылок, а также за интерпретацию результатов, полученных с использованием инструментов ИИ.
10+academic_integrity: The Economics Faculty rules state that violating AI-tool rules is an academic-ethics violation; if improper AI use without real mastery is found, a teacher may annul the work result and report the violation to faculty administration.
11+Evidence (ru, 990dff9396c1): Нарушение правил применения инструментов ИИ является нарушением академической этики. При выявлении некорректного применения ИИ без реального освоения материала студентом преподаватель вправе аннулировать результаты работы.
12+ai_tool_treatment: The Economics Faculty rules say AI-tool use is permitted by default and that the faculty supports effective, ethical, and transparent AI use for course work, term papers, and final qualification works.
13+Evidence (ru, 990dff9396c1): По умолчанию разрешено использование инструментов ИИ. Экономический факультет МГУ поддерживает студентов и работников в их эффективном, этичном и прозрачном использовании инструментов ИИ.
14+teaching: The Economics Faculty rules require teachers who use AI tools when creating materials or other work to explicitly declare that use, including the AI model, work parts, and purposes and methods of use.
15+Evidence (ru, 990dff9396c1): Если преподаватель использует инструменты ИИ при выполнении работы (создании материалов и др.), то он должен явным образом это декларировать.

Claim changes

7 claim records

academic_integrity

Under the Economics Faculty rules, a student who uses AI tools for work must explicitly declare that use and identify the AI model, the parts of the work where AI was used, and the purposes and methods of use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesru

teaching

The Economics Faculty rules allow each teacher, within a discipline, to require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban, with restrictions recorded in the discipline's rating system and communicated by the first class.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesru

source_status

Lomonosov Moscow State University's Economics Faculty has Russian-language rules defining general conditions for use of generative AI tools by students and employees in the faculty's educational process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesru

academic_integrity

The Economics Faculty rules place responsibility on students for correctness of facts, wording, citations, links, and interpretation of AI-assisted results, and treat unchecked use of AI results as an academic-ethics violation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesru

academic_integrity

The Economics Faculty rules state that violating AI-tool rules is an academic-ethics violation; if improper AI use without real mastery is found, a teacher may annul the work result and report the violation to faculty administration.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesru

ai_tool_treatment

The Economics Faculty rules say AI-tool use is permitted by default and that the faculty supports effective, ethical, and transparent AI use for course work, term papers, and final qualification works.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesru

teaching

The Economics Faculty rules require teachers who use AI tools when creating materials or other work to explicitly declare that use, including the AI model, work parts, and purposes and methods of use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesru