Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Moscow, Russia
The National University of Science and Technology MISIS has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 2 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
v1 public contract
The National University of Science and Technology MISIS has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 2 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: The National University of Science and Technology MISIS is listed as QS 2026 rank 721-730.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists The National University of Science and Technology MISIS as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/the-national-university-of-science-and-technology-misis.json. The entity-level confidence is 84%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
The National University of Science and Technology MISIS has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
The National University of Science and Technology MISIS has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
The National University of Science and Technology MISIS has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
The National University of Science and Technology MISIS has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
The National University of Science and Technology MISIS has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: staff_ai_professional_development
Original evidence
Evidence 1Программа повышения квалификации для сотрудников университета по использованию ИИ в профессиональной деятельности
Localized display only
Professional-development program for university employees on using AI in professional activity.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: ai_training_ethics_legal_generative_services
Original evidence
Evidence 1Чему вы научитесь? ... описывать этические и правовые аспекты использования ИИ; решать профессиональные задачи с использованием сервисов генеративного ИИ
Localized display only
Participants learn ethical and legal aspects of AI use and solve professional tasks using generative AI services.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
1 source attribution
edtech.misis.ru
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.