Tomsk, Russia

Tomsk State University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources3Source languageen, ruPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/tomsk-state-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score55/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence69%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

Tomsk State University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence66%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Source Status

Tomsk State University's official news service reported that the university approved provisions of a policy for the use of AI in the educational process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: official_ai_policy_announcement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Политику использования ИИ в образовательном процессе ТГУ разработали сотрудники Центра науки и этики ТГУ и Сибирского (Томского) центра изучения искусственного интеллекта. Утвердил положения документа Ученый совет университета.

Localized display only

TSU says its Center for Science and Ethics and Siberian Center for AI developed the AI-use policy for education, and the university Academic Council approved the document provisions.

Ai Tool Treatment

TSU's official announcement says the AI-use policy is addressed to participants in the educational process, including students, teaching staff, administrative staff, and third parties connected with the university's educational activity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: policy_scope_participants_in_education

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Политика использования ИИ адресована всем участникам образовательного процесса. Это и студенты, и профессорско-преподавательский состав, и административно-управленческий персонал, а также третьи лица, которые связаны с образовательной деятельностью университета.

Localized display only

The announcement says the AI-use policy is addressed to all participants in the educational process, including students, teaching staff, administrative staff, and third parties connected with university educational activity.

Ai Tool Treatment

TSU's official announcement frames the policy as developing mechanisms for using AI systems in education so they support educational quality rather than replace the educational result.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: ai_use_quality_support_not_replacement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Здесь идея не в том, чтобы запретить или ограничить, а в том, чтобы выработать механизмы применения систем ИИ в образовательном процессе так, чтобы они способствовали повышению качества образовательного результата, а не подменяли его.

Localized display only

The TSU announcement says the idea is not prohibition or restriction, but mechanisms for using AI systems in education so they improve educational quality rather than replace it.

Teaching

Official TSU pages describe teacher-facing generative AI activity, including a professional-development program for educators and related research on student and teacher use of large language models.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%

Normalized value: teacher_genai_training_context

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Еще одним планируемым результатом наших исследований должна стать разработка модели компетентности преподавателя, содержащая перечень важных навыков применения генеративного искусственного интеллекта. На основе этой модели мы подготовили программу обучения для сотрудников.

Localized display only

In an official TSU interview, a distance-education institute staff member describes a planned teacher-competency model for generative AI and a staff training program based on it.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
An accelerated development program for AI competency in educators, focused on generative artificial intelligence.

Localized display only

The rector's official English page lists an accelerated AI competency program for educators focused on generative AI.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities