Tomsk, Russia

Tomsk State University

Tomsk State University is listed as QS 2026 rank =499. Tomsk State University has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Tomsk State University is listed as QS 2026 rank =499. Tomsk State University has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Tomsk State University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/tomsk-state-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 86%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage4 reviewedSource languageen, ruPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/tomsk-state-university.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources3

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score55/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence69%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

Tomsk State University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence66%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Source Status

Tomsk State University's official news service reported that the university approved provisions of a policy for the use of AI in the educational process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: official_ai_policy_announcement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Политику использования ИИ в образовательном процессе ТГУ разработали сотрудники Центра науки и этики ТГУ и Сибирского (Томского) центра изучения искусственного интеллекта. Утвердил положения документа Ученый совет университета.

Localized display only

TSU says its Center for Science and Ethics and Siberian Center for AI developed the AI-use policy for education, and the university Academic Council approved the document provisions.

Ai Tool Treatment

TSU's official announcement says the AI-use policy is addressed to participants in the educational process, including students, teaching staff, administrative staff, and third parties connected with the university's educational activity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: policy_scope_participants_in_education

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Политика использования ИИ адресована всем участникам образовательного процесса. Это и студенты, и профессорско-преподавательский состав, и административно-управленческий персонал, а также третьи лица, которые связаны с образовательной деятельностью университета.

Localized display only

The announcement says the AI-use policy is addressed to all participants in the educational process, including students, teaching staff, administrative staff, and third parties connected with university educational activity.

Ai Tool Treatment

TSU's official announcement frames the policy as developing mechanisms for using AI systems in education so they support educational quality rather than replace the educational result.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: ai_use_quality_support_not_replacement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Здесь идея не в том, чтобы запретить или ограничить, а в том, чтобы выработать механизмы применения систем ИИ в образовательном процессе так, чтобы они способствовали повышению качества образовательного результата, а не подменяли его.

Localized display only

The TSU announcement says the idea is not prohibition or restriction, but mechanisms for using AI systems in education so they improve educational quality rather than replace it.

Teaching

Official TSU pages describe teacher-facing generative AI activity, including a professional-development program for educators and related research on student and teacher use of large language models.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%

Normalized value: teacher_genai_training_context

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Еще одним планируемым результатом наших исследований должна стать разработка модели компетентности преподавателя, содержащая перечень важных навыков применения генеративного искусственного интеллекта. На основе этой модели мы подготовили программу обучения для сотрудников.

Localized display only

In an official TSU interview, a distance-education institute staff member describes a planned teacher-competency model for generative AI and a staff training program based on it.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
An accelerated development program for AI competency in educators, focused on generative artificial intelligence.

Localized display only

The rector's official English page lists an accelerated AI competency program for educators focused on generative AI.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities