BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, PILANI DATA PRIVACY POLICY
Search
Find source-backed university AI policy records
Search names, aliases, source domains, policy themes, AI tools, and public claim summaries. Results route to canonical records and JSON.
entities
aliases
matches
search API
Search is a routing aid over promoted public records, not a policy conclusion. Open the record page, public JSON, and source evidence before reuse.
Results for "privacy"
ResetPrivacy
Guidance on Generative AI and Data Integrity, Privacy, and Security
Privacy Policy
Privacy Considerations and Generative AI Tools
Privacy Policy - PIEAS
Privacy Policy PUC-Rio
Privacy - Generative AI
Privacy & Security framework for responsible use of GenAI
Privacy & Risk - Generative AI at UBC
Best Practice: Security, Privacy, and Accessibility | Enterprise GenAI | Office of the Chief Information Officer | Illinois
Data Privacy
L'attuazione della normativa in materia di privacy tra GDPR e l'Intelligenza Artificiale
Privacy Policy
AI and Data Privacy and Security
Chatbot Privacy Notice
Generative AI on Your Terms: Data and Privacy 101
Security and Privacy Statement on Artificial Intelligence | Office of Technology and Digital Innovation
GenAI & Data Privacy
Protecting Student Privacy and Your Data
Alexandria University's AI governance strategy discussion included ensuring safe and responsible AI use through regulatory and ethical frameworks while adhering to data protection and privacy standards.
American University publishes responsible-use guidance for AI tools that applies general principles of transparency, accountability, human oversight, data protection, privacy, teaching, research, staff, and student use.
ASU Provost guidance says data for the described generative-AI teaching support is securely maintained within ASU infrastructure, supporting privacy and transparency.
ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.
BUET Registrar Office describes its mission as including security and privacy for the university's academic records, including advice and training for faculty and staff on privacy issues.
Boston University faculty and staff guidance says users should avoid inputting or sharing private or sensitive information through commercial GenAI tools because this could violate privacy laws or university policy, and says TerrierGPT is recommended for institutional use but is not approved for restricted use data.
Cairo University's responsible AI policy identifies academic-staff risks that include plagiarism or failing to attribute AI tools, privacy-compromising data sharing, hallucinations and biases, and over-reliance on AI.
Carleton instructor guidance says confidential, sensitive, or institutional data should use only Carleton-approved AI tools, and discourages adopting third-party tools that have not been cleared for privacy and security by the university.
CWRU University Technology advises users not to put sensitive university information into an AI service unless CWRU has a vendor contract with appropriate privacy and security safeguards.
For thesis work, Chalmers tells students to consult a Chalmers supervisor or relevant collaborator before using AI tools when there are uncertainties, particularly around data privacy and ethical issues.
Search APIs
Read-only public search contracts.