Policy presence
Georgia State University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Atlanta, United States
Georgia State University
Georgia State University has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 6 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
Georgia State University AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Georgia State University has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 6 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Georgia State University is listed as QS 2026 rank 781-790.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Georgia State University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/georgia-state-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Procurement claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: DeepSeek.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Georgia State University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Georgia State University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Georgia State University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Georgia State University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Georgia State University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
Georgia State University has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
Georgia State University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Georgia State University has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
Georgia State University has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Georgia State guidance says faculty, staff, and students may not submit directly identifying data or university Sensitive or Confidential data into AI tools that are not supported by Georgia State.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_pii_sensitive_confidential_data_in_unsupported_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Georgia State University faculty, staff, and students may not submit any data that directly identifies an individual or is classified by the university as Sensitive or Confidential into an AI tool not supported by Georgia State.
Ai Tool Treatment
Georgia State University has an active AI Policy addressing ethical, responsible, and secure AI use in academic and operational contexts, and the policy applies to Georgia State faculty, staff, and students.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: active_university_ai_policy_applies_faculty_staff_students
Original evidence
Evidence 1This Policy addresses the ethical, responsible, and secure use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within the academic and operational contexts of Georgia State University (GSU). ... This Policy applies to all Georgia State University faculty, staff, and students.
Security Review
Georgia State guidance says tools used for processes involving Sensitive or Confidential university data should not be used without contract review of data processing, privacy, and security before use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: contract_review_before_sensitive_or_confidential_university_data_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any tool that will be used for a process that includes university data that could be Sensitive or Confidential ... should not be used without undergoing contract review to examine data processing, privacy, and security prior to use.
Procurement
Georgia State's AI tools page identifies university-licensed AI-capable tools and lists DeepSeek and uncontracted meeting recording, transcription, and notetaking tools as prohibited or disallowed by policy or guidance.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: licensed_ai_tools_and_disallowed_tool_categories_listed
Original evidence
Evidence 1The tools below are university licensed ... and offer AI capabilities. ... Prohibited or Disallowed by Policy or Guidance ... DeepSeek ... Uncontracted meeting recording, transcription, and notetaking tools such as: Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, Read.ai, etc.
Teaching
Georgia State CETLOE guidance says instructors set boundaries for student use of generative AI tools in a course and should provide assignment-specific guidance because AI expectations may vary by graded item.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: instructors_set_course_and_assignment_ai_use_boundaries
Original evidence
Evidence 1As the instructor, you set the boundaries for how students can use generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, or Microsoft Copilot in your course. Since AI expectations may vary between different types of assignments, it's important to provide specific guidance for each graded item.
Academic Integrity
Georgia State CETLOE's suggested syllabus language says unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of generative AI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unauthorized_or_insufficiently_attributed_genai_may_be_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of GenAI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
AI in Teaching and Learning
cetloe.gsu.edu
AI Policy
gsu.policystat.com
AI Tools
technology.gsu.edu
Guidance on Generative AI and Data Integrity, Privacy, and Security
technology.gsu.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.