Atlanta, United States

Georgia State University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources4Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/georgia-state-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

AI disclosure

Georgia State University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

Georgia State University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

Georgia State guidance says faculty, staff, and students may not submit directly identifying data or university Sensitive or Confidential data into AI tools that are not supported by Georgia State.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: no_pii_sensitive_confidential_data_in_unsupported_ai_tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Georgia State University faculty, staff, and students may not submit any data that directly identifies an individual or is classified by the university as Sensitive or Confidential into an AI tool not supported by Georgia State.

Ai Tool Treatment

Georgia State University has an active AI Policy addressing ethical, responsible, and secure AI use in academic and operational contexts, and the policy applies to Georgia State faculty, staff, and students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: active_university_ai_policy_applies_faculty_staff_students

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This Policy addresses the ethical, responsible, and secure use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within the academic and operational contexts of Georgia State University (GSU). ... This Policy applies to all Georgia State University faculty, staff, and students.

Security Review

Georgia State guidance says tools used for processes involving Sensitive or Confidential university data should not be used without contract review of data processing, privacy, and security before use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: contract_review_before_sensitive_or_confidential_university_data_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Any tool that will be used for a process that includes university data that could be Sensitive or Confidential ... should not be used without undergoing contract review to examine data processing, privacy, and security prior to use.

Procurement

Georgia State's AI tools page identifies university-licensed AI-capable tools and lists DeepSeek and uncontracted meeting recording, transcription, and notetaking tools as prohibited or disallowed by policy or guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: licensed_ai_tools_and_disallowed_tool_categories_listed

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The tools below are university licensed ... and offer AI capabilities. ... Prohibited or Disallowed by Policy or Guidance ... DeepSeek ... Uncontracted meeting recording, transcription, and notetaking tools such as: Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, Read.ai, etc.

Teaching

Georgia State CETLOE guidance says instructors set boundaries for student use of generative AI tools in a course and should provide assignment-specific guidance because AI expectations may vary by graded item.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: instructors_set_course_and_assignment_ai_use_boundaries

Original evidence

Evidence 1
As the instructor, you set the boundaries for how students can use generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, or Microsoft Copilot in your course. Since AI expectations may vary between different types of assignments, it's important to provide specific guidance for each graded item.

Academic Integrity

Georgia State CETLOE's suggested syllabus language says unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of generative AI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: unauthorized_or_insufficiently_attributed_genai_may_be_academic_misconduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of GenAI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities