privacy
Georgia State guidance says faculty, staff, and students may not submit directly identifying data or university Sensitive or Confidential data into AI tools that are not supported by Georgia State.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Georgia State University
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Georgia State University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Georgia State University current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+12-0
11 # Georgia State University AI policy record
2+privacy: Georgia State guidance says faculty, staff, and students may not submit directly identifying data or university Sensitive or Confidential data into AI tools that are not supported by Georgia State.
3+Evidence (en, 8d3629ab9ae8): Georgia State University faculty, staff, and students may not submit any data that directly identifies an individual or is classified by the university as Sensitive or Confidential into an AI tool not supported by Georgia State.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Georgia State University has an active AI Policy addressing ethical, responsible, and secure AI use in academic and operational contexts, and the policy applies to Georgia State faculty, staff, and students.
5+Evidence (en, 7625d1e03a5d): This Policy addresses the ethical, responsible, and secure use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within the academic and operational contexts of Georgia State University (GSU). ... This Policy applies to all Georgia State University faculty, staff, and students.
6+security_review: Georgia State guidance says tools used for processes involving Sensitive or Confidential university data should not be used without contract review of data processing, privacy, and security before use.
7+Evidence (en, 8d3629ab9ae8): Any tool that will be used for a process that includes university data that could be Sensitive or Confidential ... should not be used without undergoing contract review to examine data processing, privacy, and security prior to use.
8+procurement: Georgia State's AI tools page identifies university-licensed AI-capable tools and lists DeepSeek and uncontracted meeting recording, transcription, and notetaking tools as prohibited or disallowed by policy or guidance.
9+Evidence (en, 83c2e23fa130): The tools below are university licensed ... and offer AI capabilities. ... Prohibited or Disallowed by Policy or Guidance ... DeepSeek ... Uncontracted meeting recording, transcription, and notetaking tools such as: Fireflies.ai, Otter.ai, Read.ai, etc.
10+teaching: Georgia State CETLOE guidance says instructors set boundaries for student use of generative AI tools in a course and should provide assignment-specific guidance because AI expectations may vary by graded item.
11+Evidence (en, 842b35c76356): As the instructor, you set the boundaries for how students can use generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, or Microsoft Copilot in your course. Since AI expectations may vary between different types of assignments, it's important to provide specific guidance for each graded item.
12+academic_integrity: Georgia State CETLOE's suggested syllabus language says unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of generative AI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.
13+Evidence (en, 842b35c76356): Unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of GenAI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.
Claim changes
6 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
Georgia State University has an active AI Policy addressing ethical, responsible, and secure AI use in academic and operational contexts, and the policy applies to Georgia State faculty, staff, and students.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Georgia State guidance says tools used for processes involving Sensitive or Confidential university data should not be used without contract review of data processing, privacy, and security before use.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
Georgia State's AI tools page identifies university-licensed AI-capable tools and lists DeepSeek and uncontracted meeting recording, transcription, and notetaking tools as prohibited or disallowed by policy or guidance.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Georgia State CETLOE guidance says instructors set boundaries for student use of generative AI tools in a course and should provide assignment-specific guidance because AI expectations may vary by graded item.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Georgia State CETLOE's suggested syllabus language says unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of generative AI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
AI in Teaching and Learning
official_guidance checked May 20, 2026
AI Policy
official_policy_page checked May 20, 2026
AI Tools
official_guidance checked May 20, 2026
Guidance on Generative AI and Data Integrity, Privacy, and Security
official_guidance checked May 20, 2026