Nilai, Malaysia

INTI International University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources3Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/inti-international-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score70/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence68%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

INTI International University has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence66%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

INTI International University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence71%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

INTI International University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence66%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

INTI's official Privacy Policy states that personal information provided to INTI will be processed under Malaysia's Data Protection Act 2010 and other relevant legislation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence83%

Normalized value: general_privacy_policy_context

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The information you provide to INTI International University & Colleges will be processed in accordance with the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2010 and any other relevant legislation.

Localized display only

Official privacy policy gives general data-protection context for information provided to INTI.

Source Status

INTI's official Ethics & Compliance page provides general ethics and compliance context, including Code of Conduct links and reporting channels, but it is not an AI-specific policy source.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: general_ethics_context_not_ai_specific_policy

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Our Ethics and Compliance standards seeks to ensure that our business practices conform to applicable laws, regulations and ethical business principles, as well as developing a culture of integrity.

Localized display only

Official page provides general ethics and compliance context, not an AI-specific rule.

Teaching

An official INTI article reports that educators were advised to use ChatGPT with caution as a supplementary resource rather than depending exclusively on its outputs.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%

Normalized value: advisory_context_only

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Educators are advised to employ ChatGPT with caution as a supplementary resource rather than depending exclusively on its outputs to ensure its effective and responsible utilisation.

Localized display only

Official article frames ChatGPT as a supplementary educator resource and warns against exclusive reliance.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities