Washington D.C., United States

Georgetown University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources4Source languageen-USPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/georgetown-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score70/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

Policy presence

Georgetown University has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

Georgetown University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

Georgetown University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

Georgetown University

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

Georgetown's AI privacy guidance says personally identifiable information should be used only with university-evaluated and approved systems or with consent, unless another approved legal or university process applies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: pii_only_in_evaluated_approved_ai_systems_or_with_consent

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Members of the Georgetown community must ensure that personally identifiable information is only used with systems that have been evaluated and approved by the university, or when individuals have provided their consent (unless permitted by applicable law or through an approved university process, such as IRB review).

Ai Tool Treatment

Georgetown's AI Tools page lists UIS-reviewed AI tools and says unapproved AI tools used for Georgetown matters should go through UIS technology review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: uis_reviewed_ai_tools_and_review_required_for_unapproved_tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
If you are using an AI tool, for a Georgetown matter, that has not yet been approved, you should contact UIS for a technology review to ensure that any necessary terms of use are protective of and acceptable to the university.

Other

Georgetown states that AI use by members of its community must remain aligned with current university policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_use_aligned_with_current_university_policies

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Use of AI by members of the Georgetown community must remain aligned with current university policies.

Teaching

Georgetown CNDLS advises that instructors should provide clear course or assignment policies about whether and how students may use AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: instructors_should_set_clear_course_or_assignment_ai_policies

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Students are being guided to refer to individual course and assignment policies outlined by the instructor to determine whether or not they are able to use AI tools at any stage in an assignment.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Guidelines for the Georgetown Community on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

aiguidelines.georgetown.edu

Snapshot hash
00916d51fa872082daed1733baf9c20d1adff8b1b89bd33797a002372f84043c

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities