privacy
Georgetown's AI privacy guidance says personally identifiable information should be used only with university-evaluated and approved systems or with consent, unless another approved legal or university process applies.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Georgetown University
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Georgetown University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Georgetown University current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+8-0
11 # Georgetown University AI policy record
2+privacy: Georgetown's AI privacy guidance says personally identifiable information should be used only with university-evaluated and approved systems or with consent, unless another approved legal or university process applies.
3+Evidence (en-US, 8ef1f71c3593): Members of the Georgetown community must ensure that personally identifiable information is only used with systems that have been evaluated and approved by the university, or when individuals have provided their consent (unless permitted by applicable law or through an approved university process, such as IRB review).
4+ai_tool_treatment: Georgetown's AI Tools page lists UIS-reviewed AI tools and says unapproved AI tools used for Georgetown matters should go through UIS technology review.
5+Evidence (en-US, 276a09359a08): If you are using an AI tool, for a Georgetown matter, that has not yet been approved, you should contact UIS for a technology review to ensure that any necessary terms of use are protective of and acceptable to the university.
6+other: Georgetown states that AI use by members of its community must remain aligned with current university policies.
7+Evidence (en-US, 00916d51fa87): Use of AI by members of the Georgetown community must remain aligned with current university policies.
8+teaching: Georgetown CNDLS advises that instructors should provide clear course or assignment policies about whether and how students may use AI tools.
9+Evidence (en-US, feda36c5ca60): Students are being guided to refer to individual course and assignment policies outlined by the instructor to determine whether or not they are able to use AI tools at any stage in an assignment.
Claim changes
4 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
Georgetown's AI Tools page lists UIS-reviewed AI tools and says unapproved AI tools used for Georgetown matters should go through UIS technology review.
Review: Agent reviewed
other
Georgetown states that AI use by members of its community must remain aligned with current university policies.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Georgetown CNDLS advises that instructors should provide clear course or assignment policies about whether and how students may use AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
AI Tools
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
Developing course policies - Artificial Intelligence (AI) Toolkit - CNDLS
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
Guidelines for the Georgetown Community on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
Privacy
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026