Kerja kursus & tugasan
Dilarang Secara Lalai Tanpa Kelulusan Bertulis Pengajar (Sekolah yang Mematuhi)
Di bawah tadbir urus akademik Columbia University yang tidak berpusat, dasar kerja kursus berbeza-beza mengikut sekolah: sekolah yang mematuhi Piawaian & Disiplin CSSI (§C.3) menganggap bantuan AI tanpa kebenaran sebagai ketidakjujuran akademik yang memerlukan kebenaran bertulis pengajar; Columbia Law School menetapkan lalai yang membenarkan sokongan penyelidikan dan penulisan yang ditetapkan melainkan pengajar mengubahnya secara bertulis (§8, §Default); dan Columbia Business School memerlukan pematuhan mod tugasan yang ditetapkan dalam sukatan pelajaran.
Kerja kursus & tugasanColumbia University
Dilarang Secara Lalai Tanpa Kelulusan Bertulis Pengajar (Sekolah yang Mematuhi)
Status dan skop
Pelajar di seluruh sekolah Columbia University (ditadbir oleh penerimaan pakai Dekan sekolah individu, tetapan lalai Law School, atau kod kehormat sekolah)
Di bawah tadbir urus akademik Columbia University yang tidak berpusat, dasar kerja kursus berbeza-beza mengikut sekolah: sekolah yang mematuhi Piawaian & Disiplin CSSI (§C.3) menganggap bantuan AI tanpa kebenaran sebagai ketidakjujuran akademik yang memerlukan kebenaran bertulis pengajar; Columbia Law School menetapkan lalai yang membenarkan sokongan penyelidikan dan penulisan yang ditetapkan melainkan pengajar mengubahnya secara bertulis (§8, §Default); dan Columbia Business School memerlukan pematuhan mod tugasan yang ditetapkan dalam sukatan pelajaran.
- Semak dasar khusus sekolah anda dan silibus kursus untuk menentukan sama ada AI dibenarkan untuk tugasan kursus dan kerja yang dinilai, dan dapatkan kebenaran bertulis daripada pengajar di tempat yang diperlukan oleh dasar sekolah.
- Amalkan pemikiran kritis yang bebas dan sahkan semua rujukan, hujah dan petikan yang dijana AI sebelum dimasukkan.
- Jangan anggap kebenaran adalah seragam merentas semua sekolah; patuhi arahan sukatan pelajaran khusus dan peraturan sekolah.
Bukti rasmi asal
2 sumber · Lompat ke sumber
Standards and Discipline 2026-2027
Versi sumber
Versi tidak direkodkan; petikan dikekalkan berasingan
Absent a clear statement or approval in writing from a course instructor granting permission, the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to complete an assignment, exam, or any other coursework is prohibited. This may include but is not limited to using AI for translation services, crafting study materials, organizing a works cited page, “polishing” a student’s work, etc.
Butiran pernyataan dan lokasi
Piawaian dan Disiplin 2026-2027
standards-and-discipline-2026-2027
§C.3 (PDF p. 8 / Print p. 6); Extracted text SHA256 cfd351450ca5a2e7fbb329f0922c9d3a52587d261c49a60a9f44e09e358a5dba; original binding lines 655–663; characters 12574–12962
The Associate Vice President (“AVP”) for Student Success and Intervention in the Center for Student Success and Intervention (“CSSI”) is appointed to oversee and manage the Dean’s Discipline process at the behest of the Deans of each school adhering to the Standards and Discipline, or the “Policy,” and accompanying procedures. The AVP or designee may appoint administrative Hearing Officers to efficiently and effectively supervise and facilitate the Dean’s Discipline process. Adoption of the following guidelines is at the discretion of the Dean of each school. In matters not contemplated under this specific policy and -1 1- procedure, a school may appoint Student Conduct (“SC”) to conduct the investigation, support the administration of a separate established discipline process, or administer the Dean’s Discipline process described herein on their behalf.
Butiran pernyataan dan lokasi
Piawaian dan Disiplin 2026-2027
standards-and-discipline-2026-2027
§I.A (PDF p. 3 / Print p. 1); Extracted text SHA256 cfd351450ca5a2e7fbb329f0922c9d3a52587d261c49a60a9f44e09e358a5dba; original binding lines 115–151; characters 1712–2587
Columbia Law School: Policy on Student Use of Generative AI
Versi sumber
Versi tidak direkodkan; petikan dikekalkan berasingan
Writing Support and Error Correction: Students are permitted to consult AI to test arguments, solicit criticism, and explore alternative articulations. Students may also use AI to improve their written work, including for clarity and reliability, alternate phrasing, and tone and concision. Students are also permitted to use AI tools to assist in identifying and correcting spelling and grammatical errors. In all of these cases, students are required to independently and rigorously assess the feedback generated by AI, using their own critical judgment to decide whether and how to implement any suggestions.
Butiran pernyataan dan lokasi
Columbia Law School: Dasar Penggunaan AI Generatif oleh Pelajar
law-school-ai-policy
§8.3 (Writing Support and Error Correction); Extracted text SHA256 9d9ed8d41848f2c05ec4c9ae3b3a4392e98f951ca0ebd401a55919f21369d891; original binding lines 339–339; characters 15347–15958
Default: The Rules set forth in Sections 8 through 11 of this Policy are considered defaults. Individual instructors may adopt alternative course or assignment-specific policies as long as they do so in writing, at a minimum in the initial course syllabus, and with advance notice to all students. To the extent that a faculty member does not communicate an alternative this Policy will apply.
Butiran pernyataan dan lokasi
Columbia Law School: Dasar Penggunaan AI Generatif oleh Pelajar
law-school-ai-policy
§Default; Extracted text SHA256 9d9ed8d41848f2c05ec4c9ae3b3a4392e98f951ca0ebd401a55919f21369d891; original binding lines 299–299; characters 10379–10772
Generation of Written Work: Work submitted for academic credit must be student-composed, not AI-generated. Student-composed work reflects ideas, arguments, analysis, and expression that are the product of the student's own intellectual creativity and judgment. Students must deliberately choose the positions they advance; understand and be able to explain and defend every material proposition in their submissions; and accept responsibility for the accuracy, reasoning, and conclusions reflected in their work. Revising, editing, or paraphrasing AI-generated text does not, by itself, transform AI-generated work into student-generated work. Even when assisted by AI tools, students bear full intellectual responsibility for every proposition in their submitted work.
Butiran pernyataan dan lokasi
Columbia Law School: Dasar Penggunaan AI Generatif oleh Pelajar
law-school-ai-policy
§9.2 (Generation of Written Work); Extracted text SHA256 9d9ed8d41848f2c05ec4c9ae3b3a4392e98f951ca0ebd401a55919f21369d891; original binding lines 351–351; characters 16878–17647





