For Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering Triposes, the assessment brief takes precedence. Declare GenAI used to prepare summative work unless the brief says otherwise. Do not generate raw submission content without an initial self-written base or automatically generate references from content; tools managing student-identified references remain allowed.

檢視證據 →

Research: check RDM, funder and publisher conditions

RDM v4 covers the research community, including students involved in research. Check applicable requirements for research, dissemination, funding applications and assessment; no distinct GenAI research policy does not mean unrestricted use.

檢視證據 →

應做事項

使用前請查閱院系、學院及評量說明。
來源指引
使用前請查閱院系、學院及評量說明。
範圍
請針對每項所引規定，查閱其適用的課程、學術單位、活動及例外情況。網站上的建議並不構成大學的義務。
Cambridge 廣泛允許將 GenAI 適當用於個人學習、研究與形成性作業，並由各系、院或書院的細緻指引掌控具體情境。學生應向教職員確認當地規則；這並非總結性評估的全面許可。
原始證據與範圍
Cambridge 廣泛允許將 GenAI 適當用於個人學習、研究與形成性作業，並由各系、院或書院的細緻指引掌控具體情境。學生應向教職員確認當地規則；這並非總結性評估的全面許可。
claim-cam-education-1
The University of Cambridge broadly permits the appropriate use of GenAI tools and related software, however, due to the variety of disciplines and research areas present at the institution, there is need for more nuanced guidance at local levels.
Derived source text lines 133-133; exact character range 6450:6697; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Students are permitted to make appropriate use of GenAI tools to support their personal study, research and formative work. Appropriate use is better defined locally by Department, Faculty, or College depending on the context and you should always check with a member of staff to be sure you know how you are able to use these tools for your education. General guidance for use of GenAI is available as well as specific guidance for assessment-related queries.
Derived source text lines 135-135; exact character range 6941:7401; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
請查閱工程學院的備課用途聲明，以及針對特定任務的例外規定。
本站建議
請查閱工程學院的備課用途聲明，以及針對特定任務的例外規定。
範圍
請針對每項所引規定，查閱其適用的課程、學術單位、活動及例外情況。網站上的建議並不構成大學的義務。
工程與製造工程學程（Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering Triposes）的政策，經學部委員會（Faculty Board）於2026年6月核准，要求申報用於準備總結性作業的所有生成式AI使用情況，除非評量說明另有規定。個別作業的規定優先。學生不得在沒有自行撰寫之初稿的情況下生成原始的提交或簡報內容，亦不得從內容自動生成參考文獻；管理學生自行識別之參考文獻的工具仍被允許。學生須對所提交的作業負責，並應能加以說明；即使未確認學術不端行為，成績仍反映未達成的學習成果。
原始證據與範圍
工程與製造工程學程（Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering Triposes）的政策，經學部委員會（Faculty Board）於2026年6月核准，要求申報用於準備總結性作業的所有生成式AI使用情況，除非評量說明另有規定。個別作業的規定優先。學生不得在沒有自行撰寫之初稿的情況下生成原始的提交或簡報內容，亦不得從內容自動生成參考文獻；管理學生自行識別之參考文獻的工具仍被允許。學生須對所提交的作業負責，並應能加以說明；即使未確認學術不端行為，成績仍反映未達成的學習成果。
claim-cam-engineering-genai-assessment-2026
Approved by Faculty Board June 2026
Derived source text lines 68-68; exact character range 1207:1242; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
This document sets out guidance for the use of Generative AI by students within the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering Triposes. As it contains a mixture of rules and advice this document uses the word 'must' to identify rules where a failure to adhere might constitute academic misconduct and the word 'should' to identify best practice advice.
Derived source text lines 71-71; exact character range 1709:2061; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Unless otherwise stated in an assessment brief students must declare all usage of Generative AI used in the preparation of a piece of summative work.
Derived source text lines 84-84; exact character range 4356:4505; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Such per assessment guidance must be adhered to and supersedes any general rules or advice in this document.
Derived source text lines 85-85; exact character range 4753:4861; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Students must not use Gen AI to generate raw text and content for submission or for assessed presentations without working from an initial self-written base.
Derived source text lines 86-86; exact character range 4862:5019; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Students must not use Gen AI to automatically generate and format references and bibliographies.
Derived source text lines 87-87; exact character range 5120:5216; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
It is permitted to use tools to track and format references that the student has themselves identified, such as EndNote, Bibtex or similar.
Derived source text lines 87-87; exact character range 5397:5536; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Students are responsible for everything they submit for assessment, irrespective of use of Gen AI. This includes every factual claim, all referencing and citations, all representation of data, all use of language and all arguments.
Derived source text lines 75-75; exact character range 2372:2603; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Students will be expected to be able to explain and account for all aspects of submitted work, if a student is unable to do so this will be taken to imply that relevant learning outcomes have not been achieved. This will be reflected in any marks awarded even if there is no evidence of academic misconduct.
Derived source text lines 76-76; exact character range 2604:2911; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Students should be aware that they could produce a piece of work with extensive permitted use of declared AI that, nonetheless, has not allowed the demonstration of key learning outcomes. Such work, even if correct, will not attract good marks.
Derived source text lines 102-102; exact character range 7935:8179; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
進行研究時，請遵循RDM框架及資助方／出版方的要求。
本範圍要求
進行研究時，請遵循RDM框架及資助方／出版方的要求。
範圍
請針對每項所引規定，查閱其適用的課程、學術單位、活動及例外情況。網站上的建議並不構成大學的義務。
劍橋大學《研究數據管理政策框架》第 4 版（於 2026 年 6 月 25 日審閱），要求其研究社群（包括參與研究的教職員與學生）遵守適用於研究、傳播、資助申請及研究評鑑中生成式 AI（GenAI）的大學、資助機構與出版商要求。相關議題包括敏感數據、所有權、著作權、倫理、誠信與安全。該框架指出，大學並無獨立的 GenAI 研究政策；但這並不表示研究工作沒有任何與 AI 相關的規則。
原始證據與範圍
劍橋大學《研究數據管理政策框架》第 4 版（於 2026 年 6 月 25 日審閱），要求其研究社群（包括參與研究的教職員與學生）遵守適用於研究、傳播、資助申請及研究評鑑中生成式 AI（GenAI）的大學、資助機構與出版商要求。相關議題包括敏感數據、所有權、著作權、倫理、誠信與安全。該框架指出，大學並無獨立的 GenAI 研究政策；但這並不表示研究工作沒有任何與 AI 相關的規則。
claim-cam-research-data-genai-framework-2026
Complying with any requirements from the University, research funders, or publishers when using Generative AI as a tool when undertaking or disseminating research, or when applying for funding, or in the assessment of research.
Derived source text lines 187-187; exact character range 17736:17963; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
The use of Generative AI tools has implications for sensitive data (e.g. personal, confidential), data ownership, copyright, intellectual property, research ethics and integrity, information security, and environmental sustainability, including when reusing research data created utilising them.
Derived source text lines 187-187; exact character range 17964:18259; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
At present there is no distinct University policy for using Generative AI tools in research.
Derived source text lines 187-187; exact character range 18260:18352; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
This policy framework applies to all members of staff and students and research-enabling staff (e.g. professional services, technical) at the University.
Derived source text lines 138-138; exact character range 3770:3923; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Version: 4
Derived source text lines 314-314; exact character range 36075:36085; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Date of policy review: 25 June 2026
Derived source text lines 315-315; exact character range 36086:36121; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗

請勿

除非作業指引另有明確規定，否則切勿將未經鳴謝說明的 AI 評量內容呈現為您自己的作品。
本範圍要求
除非作業指引另有明確規定，否則切勿將未經鳴謝說明的 AI 評量內容呈現為您自己的作品。
範圍
請針對每項所引規定，查閱其適用的課程、學術單位、活動及例外情況。網站上的建議並不構成大學的義務。
除非評量簡要說明中另有明確規定，否則學生在總結性評量中使用任何未註明出處的人工智慧生成內容並視為其自身作業，即構成學術不當行為。
原始證據與範圍
除非評量簡要說明中另有明確規定，否則學生在總結性評量中使用任何未註明出處的人工智慧生成內容並視為其自身作業，即構成學術不當行為。
claim-cam-assessment-1
“A student using any unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment brief.” Plagiarism & Academic Misconduct
Derived source text lines 119-119; exact character range 2777:3045; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
考試委員不得將學生作品上傳至生成式 AI 進行分析或回饋。
本範圍要求
考試委員不得將學生作品上傳至生成式 AI 進行分析或回饋。
範圍
請針對每項所引規定，查閱其適用的課程、學術單位、活動及例外情況。網站上的建議並不構成大學的義務。
劍橋大學指出，考評人員在本科、授課型研究生及研究型研究生課程中，不得將學生作品上傳、複製或分享予生成式 AI／大型語言模型，或利用其分析作品並撰寫回饋。由於儲存與使用方式不明確，該來源亦禁止未經學生許可而分享學生的作品或智慧財產。考評人員可借助 AI 協助撰寫自己的回饋，例如整理個人筆記或改寫評語；但這並非允許一概上傳學生作品的全面授權。
原始證據與範圍
劍橋大學指出，考評人員在本科、授課型研究生及研究型研究生課程中，不得將學生作品上傳、複製或分享予生成式 AI／大型語言模型，或利用其分析作品並撰寫回饋。由於儲存與使用方式不明確，該來源亦禁止未經學生許可而分享學生的作品或智慧財產。考評人員可借助 AI 協助撰寫自己的回饋，例如整理個人筆記或改寫評語；但這並非允許一概上傳學生作品的全面授權。
claim-cam-assessment-3
Examiners across all programmes of study (including Undergraduate, Postgraduate Taught, and Postgraduate Research) are not permitted to upload, copy, or share student work with Generative AI (GenAI) tools and Large Language Models (LLMs).
Derived source text lines 130-130; exact character range 5103:5341; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Examiners may not use tools, such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Bard, or Microsoft Copilot, to analyse work submitted by students and provide written feedback.
Derived source text lines 130-130; exact character range 5342:5502; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Due to lack of clarity and uncertainty of how these tools use and/or store input data, it is not permitted to share student IP and submitted work without permission from the student.
Derived source text lines 130-130; exact character range 5503:5685; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
Where preferred, however, examiners may use these tools to support their own writing in the process of documenting feedback (e.g., consolidating personal notes and rephrasing comments).
Derived source text lines 131-131; exact character range 5686:5871; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
切勿將教職員工行政指引視為普遍適用的學生評量規則。
本站建議
切勿將教職員工行政指引視為普遍適用的學生評量規則。
範圍
請針對每項所引規定，查閱其適用的課程、學術單位、活動及例外情況。網站上的建議並不構成大學的義務。
劍橋大學針對教職員行政使用的指引建議，除非有正當理由且符合指引規範，否則應避免在 GenAI 中輸入機密、敏感或個人資料。本文件明確排除教學、學生學習/評定、研究以及書院或其他獨立實體的業務。這並非針對所有學生使用 AI 的無條件隱私禁止規定。
原始證據與範圍
劍橋大學針對教職員行政使用的指引建議，除非有正當理由且符合指引規範，否則應避免在 GenAI 中輸入機密、敏感或個人資料。本文件明確排除教學、學生學習/評定、研究以及書院或其他獨立實體的業務。這並非針對所有學生使用 AI 的無條件隱私禁止規定。
claim-cam-info-compliance-1
Regardless of the work being undertaken, it is recommended that staff avoid inputting confidential, sensitive or personal information into GenAI tools unless warranted and only in accordance with this guidance.
Derived source text lines 148-148; exact character range 8327:8537; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
This guidance does not apply to any task or content creation undertaken in the direct provision of teaching, student learning and/or academic assessment.
Derived source text lines 130-130; exact character range 5964:6117; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
It does not apply to any research undertaken with the assistance of any form of GenAI. The ethics and appropriateness of its use in those circumstances will be assessed by other established means (e.g. research ethics processes).
Derived source text lines 136-136; exact character range 6666:6895; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗
This guidance does not apply to use of GenAI tools by College employees for any College business, or to the Students’ Union, student societies, or Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
Derived source text lines 138-138; exact character range 6945:7132; original source representation retained
大學官方來源 ↗

AI 使用受到質疑？調查、可能結果與申訴

AI工具與存取

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat機構存取／授權在來源範圍內記錄為允許
請使用大學 Microsoft 帳戶登入；須符合標準授權的資格規定。
Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat · 存取條件
大多數劍橋大學教職員與學生擁有標準微軟授權，可免費使用 Copilot Chat。Microsoft 365 應用程式整合需要額外的付費授權；UIS 目前列出每位使用者每年約300英鎊，且需購買 A3 或 A5 帳戶。機構帳戶存取權限與商業資料保護並不賦予評量許可。
請使用大學 Microsoft 帳戶登入；須符合標準授權的資格規定。
標準授權使用者無需額外付費。
Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat · 官方證據
來源 1 ↗
原文引用
Most staff and students at the University have a standard Microsoft licence. This includes access to Copilot Chat.
來源 2 ↗
原文引用
Most staff and students at the University have a standard Microsoft licence at no extra cost.
來源 3 ↗
原文引用
You must buy a licence, in addition to a standard Microsoft licence, to use Copilot with Microsoft 365. This costs around £300 per annum, per user.
來源 4 ↗
原文引用
Your account must have an A3 or A5 licence in the University Office365 tenancy.
Copilot for Microsoft 365機構存取／授權適用條件
透過 UIS 服務申請並使用 A3/A5 大學帳戶購買。
Copilot for Microsoft 365 · 存取條件
大多數劍橋大學教職員與學生擁有標準微軟授權，可免費使用 Copilot Chat。Microsoft 365 應用程式整合需要額外的付費授權；UIS 目前列出每位使用者每年約300英鎊，且需購買 A3 或 A5 帳戶。機構帳戶存取權限與商業資料保護並不賦予評量許可。
透過 UIS 服務申請並使用 A3/A5 大學帳戶購買。
付費額外授權；UIS 目前列出的價格約為每年每位使用者 £300。
Copilot for Microsoft 365 · 官方證據
來源 1 ↗
原文引用
Most staff and students at the University have a standard Microsoft licence. This includes access to Copilot Chat.
來源 2 ↗
原文引用
Most staff and students at the University have a standard Microsoft licence at no extra cost.
來源 3 ↗
原文引用
You must buy a licence, in addition to a standard Microsoft licence, to use Copilot with Microsoft 365. This costs around £300 per annum, per user.
來源 4 ↗
原文引用
Your account must have an A3 or A5 licence in the University Office365 tenancy.
Google Gemini機構存取／授權在來源範圍內記錄為允許
請使用大學的 Google Workspace 帳號。
Google Gemini · 存取條件
Google Gemini 是該大學 Google Workspace 中的核心應用程式，供教職員及學生使用。
請使用大學的 Google Workspace 帳號。
大學工作區核心應用程式存取；適用個人帳戶資格規定。
Google Gemini · 官方證據
來源 1 ↗
原文引用
Google Gemini and NotebookLM are now part of the University's Google Workspace core apps. They are available to staff and students.
Google NotebookLM機構存取／授權在來源範圍內記錄為允許
請使用大學的 Google Workspace 帳號。
Google NotebookLM · 存取條件
Google NotebookLM 是該大學 Google Workspace 中的核心應用程式，可供教職員和學生使用。
請使用大學的 Google Workspace 帳號。
大學工作區核心應用程式存取；適用個人帳戶資格規定。
Google NotebookLM · 官方證據
來源 1 ↗
原文引用
Google Gemini and NotebookLM are now part of the University's Google Workspace core apps. They are available to staff and students.

紀錄更新最近90天 · 已記錄的更新：2

此為本網站已審查紀錄的更新，並不代表大學已變更其政策。

2026-10-27頁面更新
其他紀錄 · 頁面更新
檢視修訂版本
正在載入修訂版本…
2026-10-14新增紀錄 · 網站更正
課程作業 · 考試 · 另有 10 個主題 · Records involved: 19 (16 corrected / adjusted · 3 added)
檢視修訂版本
正在載入修訂版本…

已審查的聲明

19 · Reviewed

官方來源

9 個官方網址；9 項來源出處及其擷取版本已保留。

Generative AI and Assessment | Blended Learning Service

blendedlearning.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

Generative AI and Assessment | Blended Learning Service · 2026-10-12T03:41:33.246741Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

a310c4aa40508d1b831c6635dc7f9354b90d4218087199223df2bc7a306b5e63

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Google Gemini and NotebookLM available in the University’s Google Workspace | IT Help and Support

help.uis.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

Google Gemini and NotebookLM available in the University’s Google Workspace | IT Help and Support · 2026-10-12T03:41:42.766201Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

2dcb55cdd9bd4f7f7f9dee6586e53079dc7b293484c044cc4b6056c5bb69422c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Copilot | IT Help and Support

help.uis.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

Copilot | IT Help and Support · 2026-10-12T03:41:52.978735Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

5f474de3c10df14839b77d9372f57e1adf0b31660c3a74e89a4fdc7d33d0ceec

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

AI guidance | Information Compliance

www.information-compliance.admin.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

AI guidance | Information Compliance · 2026-10-12T03:41:35.588607Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

37095775d64642549fe7814e78c09e928793edd1fdc45edc209e0fd9e86066c3

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Generative AI and Education | Blended Learning Service

blendedlearning.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

Generative AI and Education | Blended Learning Service · 2026-10-12T03:41:33.709934Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3e4ad5ac3cb5c090a80c65e0be5750f1774da1052d4f6ad6cfc20c71c175dca9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

AI Policy Framework | Blended Learning Service

blendedlearning.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

AI Policy Framework | Blended Learning Service · 2026-10-12T03:41:32.795527Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d075c2a71f4ad8453d3dec2676f72ae1259873208a0f2f6c6b7b981b76d3b323

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Use of Generative AI Policy | CUED undergraduate teaching site

teaching26-27.eng.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

Use of Generative AI Policy | CUED undergraduate teaching site · 2026-10-12T03:41:42.904795Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

11db2e84d2ff6e17851dddce74373581350cd603752db8dd6cf8973511da651f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Research Data Management Policy Framework | Open Research

www.openresearch.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

Research Data Management Policy Framework | Open Research · 2026-10-12T03:41:42.622137Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

fe906647e277f3bf031c873d2a2ef1773c0ef7f358082dba987daf400d95a49b

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Turnitin | Education Quality and Policy Office

www.educationalpolicy.admin.cam.ac.uk

大學官方來源

University of Cambridge

雜湊值與擷取版本

Turnitin | Education Quality and Policy Office · 2026-10-12T03:41:35.914750Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

260382d92d8021c9e90981ebda1aa7d9c3fe5ee17c7b2e7d2af6fa9927f54e44

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

紀錄資訊、JSON 與引用格式

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state: agent_reviewed
Analysis review state: machine_candidate
Record revision: v6-audit-fix-20261014
Dataset release: public-release-20260924-002
Correction published: 2026-10-14T02:23:21.633198Z
Student snapshot: Pending independent agent review; not an approved snapshot

Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

This scoped correction publishes the reviewed current record to the university JSON and MCP. Previous baseline records and review approvals are retained separately in history.

v6-audit-fix-20261014

6dd675a9d1b3affb3423c9da152b74e8357e93ccafa23432aba218b3565767f1

View current reviewed JSON

Supplementary, historical and disciplinary-object audit coverage is recorded separately; this page review does not assert a complete all-object QS audit.

學生提出的問題

我可以在課程作業中使用 AI 嗎？

檢視證據 →

我需要揭露 AI 的使用嗎？

檢視證據 →

我可以上傳敏感資料嗎？

教育與研究數據規則在其各自的情境中適用。教職員行政指南明確排除學生學習、評量與研究。考官不得將學生作業上傳至生成式 AI。

檢視證據 →

我可以存取哪些工具？

檢視證據 →

考試規則是什麼？

適用總結性評估及本地評估說明的限制。本次資料擷取並未確立統一適用的考試許可規則；請查閱你所屬學院的規定與考試指示。