Sendai City, Japan Last checked

Tohoku University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework & Assessment

Instructor Approval Required

Tohoku University guidance specifies that students must confirm whether and how generative AI may be used with their instructor for each individual course.

Official source ↗

Exams & In-Person Assessment

Subject to Prohibitions

Depending on course objectives, instructors may restrict or prohibit AI tool use during exams or assessments; students must strictly obey instructor orders.

Official source ↗

AI Disclosure & Declarations

Advisory Guidance

Guidance reminds students that directly submitting generative AI outputs as report answers should be avoided as it does not contribute to learning; standardized disclosure templates remain an unverified policy gap.

Official source ↗

Privacy & Data Protection

Caution Advised

Guidance cautions students that inputting unpublished research findings, confidential university data, or personal information into generative AI carries risks of unintended data leakage.

Official source ↗

Approved AI Tools

Representative Tools Listed

The university's guidance identifies ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion as representative tools, advising members on model functionality and opt-out procedures.

Official source ↗

Research & Authorship

Mandatory Error Checking

Student guidance says AI outputs can contain errors and users need to check for themselves whether outputs are correct.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic Integrity

Course-Specific Risk

Guidance warns that instructors may prohibit generative AI in specific courses, and unauthorized use may in some cases be deemed plagiarism; formal disciplinary referral procedures remain an unverified gap.

Official source ↗

Teaching Practice

Dual Guidance Structure

The Digital Education Advisory Group publishes dedicated considerations for faculty, assisting instructors in tailoring syllabus objectives and exam designs.

Official source ↗

Security & Procurement

Pending Verification

Commercial procurement contracts and enterprise data processing agreements were not verified in local crawl extractions.

Before you submit

Do

  • Confirm with your course instructor whether generative AI is permitted before using it in any course.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Check for yourself whether AI output is correct, as student guidance advises.
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Avoid submitting generative AI outputs directly as report answers, as it does not contribute to your own learning.
    Source guidance
  • Exercise caution and avoid inputting unpublished research findings, confidential data, or personal information due to data leakage risks.
    Source guidance

AI use questioned?

Tohoku University

Tohoku University advisory guidance: Students should confirm course-specific AI permissions with instructors; guidance cautions against copying AI outputs directly into reports and advises against inputting unpublished research or personal data due to leakage risks; unauthorized use may be deemed plagiarism.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

ChatGPT

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 1

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-28.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

6

Official sources

3 official URLs; 3 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

ChatGPT等の生成系AI利用に関する留意事項(学生向け)

olg.cds.tohoku.ac.jp

University official source

olg.cds.tohoku.ac.jp

Hash and captured version

ChatGPT等の生成系AI利用に関する留意事項(学生向け) · 2026-05-14T04:23:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

74e46595ac81815d02273cd879cf8d3061443dd2ae38a8e6893a05ac2fccc928

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

ChatGPT等の生成系AI利用に関する留意事項(教員向け)

olg.cds.tohoku.ac.jp

University official source

olg.cds.tohoku.ac.jp

Hash and captured version

ChatGPT等の生成系AI利用に関する留意事項(教員向け) · 2026-05-14T04:23:30.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d617c34d4477facf9bab1096b7877022ddd1b49eabaa8339295fc08bbdc7171d

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

事務(技術)職員の方向け | 東北大学 DXナビゲーション

www.dx.tohoku.ac.jp

University official source

dx.tohoku.ac.jp

Hash and captured version

事務(技術)職員の方向け | 東北大学 DXナビゲーション · 2026-05-14T04:28:30.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d7366615e84a0bcc391742f98c9f0ce9b059ef136a1df99669dbc0624d0475a9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-qs101-120-presentation-20261028
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Formal investigation workflows, sanction outcome schedules, and appeal procedures under Tohoku University regulations are not fully evidenced by the course-level plagiarism warning excerpt.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Tohoku University guidance specifies that students must confirm whether and how generative AI may be used with their instructor for each individual course.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Guidance reminds students that directly submitting generative AI outputs as report answers should be avoided as it does not contribute to learning; standardized disclosure templates remain an unverified policy gap.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Guidance cautions students that inputting unpublished research findings, confidential university data, or personal information into generative AI carries risks of unintended data leakage.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        The university's guidance identifies ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion as representative tools, advising members on model functionality and opt-out procedures.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        Depending on course objectives, instructors may restrict or prohibit AI tool use during exams or assessments; students must strictly obey instructor orders.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Student guidance says AI outputs can contain errors and users need to check for themselves whether outputs are correct.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Guidance warns that instructors may prohibit generative AI in specific courses, and unauthorized use may in some cases be deemed plagiarism; formal disciplinary referral procedures remain an unverified gap.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        The Digital Education Advisory Group publishes dedicated considerations for faculty, assisting instructors in tailoring syllabus objectives and exam designs.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        Commercial procurement contracts and enterprise data processing agreements were not verified in local crawl extractions.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        6 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        Tohoku University AI Policy