Coursework
Read scoped evidence; review pending
The retained 2024–25 assessment rules are historical. Newer M1 distance-physics material is programme-specific; current general coursework permission remains unresolved.
Paris, France Last checked
Sorbonne University
Compare universities
Selected universities1/4
Sorbonne University
Independent · Open access · Not an official university page
What would you like to check?
Explore the current record by topic
Exams
Read scoped evidence; review pending
No current university-wide exam permission is established here. The old assessment record and programme-specific evidence must be kept distinct.
Disclosure
Read scoped evidence; review pending
In Faculty of Health research, document GenAI use when writing scientific documents, including reports, dissertations and theses. This is not a general course citation rule.
Privacy and data
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Faculty of Health research recommendations exclude non-public or unpublished content and personal, confidential or sensitive data from GenAI tools.
Tools and eligibility
Read scoped evidence; review pending
CAPSULE lists Compilatio Magister+ as a detection resource. SORBONNE.AI/SCAI course listings do not establish generative-assistant or assessment-use permission.
Research and publication
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Faculty of Health guidance requires transparent documentation of GenAI use and does not recommend generative tools for translation; translation-only software is distinguished.
More reviewed record topics
Academic integrity
Read scoped evidence; review pending
The Compilatio listing establishes a detection function, not that a score proves misconduct. A current investigation or appeal procedure is not established here.
Teaching guidance
Read scoped evidence; review pending
The retained Claims do not establish a general teaching policy on AI-assisted assessment or student-work uploads. Health research advice has a different audience.
Security and procurement
Read scoped evidence; review pending
Faculty of Health research data restrictions are recorded, but no general procurement approval process or tool-account entitlement is established.
Before you submit
Do
- In Faculty of Health research documents, record how GenAI tools were used.
- For translation in this research context, distinguish translation-only software from generative tools before applying the recommendation.
Don’t
- In Faculty of Health research, do not transmit non-public or unpublished content to a GenAI tool.
- In that research context, do not submit personal, confidential or sensitive data to GenAI tools.
- In Faculty of Health research, avoid using generative tools such as ChatGPT for translation, as recommended.
Tool discovery records: scope pending review
Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.
OpenClassrooms AI courses via SORBONNE.AI
Access conditions (discovery record)
The following discovery information is retained; currentness and complete eligibility remain unverified.
Register through the SORBONNE.AI/SCAI Education path and receive or use the associated OpenClassrooms course licence.
The official programme page describes university-provided licences; it does not state a student charge.
Discovery record and cited evidence
OpenClassrooms AI and machine-learning course access made available through Sorbonne University's SORBONNE.AI programme.
SORBONNE.AI states that OpenClassrooms gives access to more than 50 online modular courses on AI and machine learning to 5,000 Sorbonne University students and directs students to register for an OpenClassrooms licence.
Official source ↗8794fff58a3145d5d21557dbfad6d705116abec431e047b77d8d382f6a2bd458
SCAI Education
Access conditions (discovery record)
The following discovery information is retained; currentness and complete eligibility remain unverified.
Register through the SCAI Education platform; the official page exposes a free sign-up path and course catalogue.
The platform page advertises free sign-up; specific course or licence terms are not otherwise stated.
Discovery record and cited evidence
Sorbonne University's SCAI Education platform for online AI courses and assessments.
Sorbonne University officially provides SCAI Education as an institutional platform: it invites users to enroll in online AI courses, provides access through a live course catalogue and login/sign-up path, and hosts modules for students, researchers and professionals.
Official source ↗08b632649b94b1cf58ad3033ec0c20ed5350e80ea0bac7c731e37df157b1fe1b
Record updates
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
Other records · Record maintenance
View revision
Loading revision…
Reviewed claims
4
Privacy 1 reviewed claim
Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say not to transmit non-public or unpublished content, personal data, confidential data, or sensitive data to a generative AI tool.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Ne pas transmettre à un outil d’IA générative de contenu qui ne soit pas public ou déjà publié. Ne pas soumettre à un outil d’IA générative des données personnelles, confidentielles ou sensibles.Localized display only
Do not transmit content that is not public or already published to a generative AI tool; do not submit personal, confidential, or sensitive data to a generative AI tool.
Evidence locator: Section: Protection des donnees
Research 2 reviewed claims
Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say users should be transparent about generative AI use in research projects and document use when writing scientific documents such as protocols, analysis plans, reports, articles, presentations, dissertations, or theses.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faire preuve de transparence sur l’utilisation d’outils IA générative dans les projets de recherche. Lors de la rédaction de documents scientifiques, tels qu’un protocole de recherche, un plan d’analyse, un rapport, un article, une présentation en congrès, un mémoire, ou une thèse, vous devez documenter l’utilisation de ces outils.Localized display only
Be transparent about the use of generative AI tools in research projects, and document the use of these tools when writing scientific documents.
Evidence locator: Section: Transparence
Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations distinguish translation-only software such as DeepL or Linguee from generative AI tools and say using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for translation is not recommended.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Les logiciels à des fins exclusives de traduction (tels que DeePL ou Linguee) ne sont pas des outils d’IA générative et ne sont donc pas concernés par ces recommandations. À l’opposé, utiliser des outils d’IA générative (tel que ChatGPT) pour la traduction n’est pas recommandé.Localized display only
Translation-only software such as DeepL or Linguee is not treated as generative AI, while using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for translation is not recommended.
Evidence locator: Section: Traduction
AI tool use 1 reviewed claim
Sorbonne University's CAPSULE resources page lists Compilatio Magister+ with CAS SU access as a resource for plagiarism prevention and detection of AI-generated content.
Reviewed
Scope: Read each original source audience and year; currentness and completeness remain unverified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Compilatio Magister + La prévention et la détection du plagiat et des contenus générés par des IA. La solution Compilatio Magister + regroupe un logiciel détecteur de similitudes des ressources pédagogiques, de plagiat syntaxique et de contenus générés par des IALocalized display only
Compilatio Magister+ is described as supporting prevention and detection of plagiarism and AI-generated content, with a similarity, plagiarism, and AI-generated-content detector.
Evidence locator: Section: Plateformes - Compilatio Magister +
Historical and pending public Claims (4)
These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.
cl-sorbonne-university-institutional-ai-service-331 · excluded_pending_review
AI training courses; seats, costs and current eligibility not verified.
SORBONNE.AI/OpenClassrooms is an education/course programme, not evidence of a generative assistant licence.
Record historyAI tool use 1 reviewed claim
OpenClassrooms AI courses via SORBONNE.AI is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Reviewed
Scope: AI training courses; seats, costs and current eligibility not verified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1SORBONNE.AI states that OpenClassrooms gives access to more than 50 online modular courses on AI and machine learning to 5,000 Sorbonne University students and directs students to register for an OpenClassrooms licence.Localized display only
SORBONNE.AI states that OpenClassrooms gives access to more than 50 online modular courses on AI and machine learning to 5,000 Sorbonne University students and directs students to register for an OpenClassrooms licence.
cl-sorbonne-university-institutional-ai-service-332 · excluded_pending_review
Course platform; exact access/cost conditions not verified.
SCAI Education is educational content/platform; endorsement does not prove generative-tool access or assessment permission.
Record historyAI tool use 1 reviewed claim
SCAI Education is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Reviewed
Scope: Course platform; exact access/cost conditions not verified.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Sorbonne University officially provides SCAI Education as an institutional platform: it invites users to enroll in online AI courses, provides access through a live course catalogue and login/sign-up path, and hosts modules for students, researchers and professionals.Localized display only
Sorbonne University officially provides SCAI Education as an institutional platform: it invites users to enroll in online AI courses, provides access through a live course catalogue and login/sign-up path, and hosts modules for students, researchers and professionals.
claim-su-ai-default-refused · historical_only
2024–25 historical university assessment record; newer M1 distance physics cannot establish current university-wide rule.
Old 2024–25 regulation unavailable in research retrieval; 2026–27 M1 distance physics text is programme-specific.
Record historyAcademic Integrity 1 reviewed claim
Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.
Reviewed
Scope: 2024–25 historical university assessment record; newer M1 distance physics cannot establish current university-wide rule.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1L’ensemble des documents produits dans le cadre d’une évaluation doit être l’œuvre personnelle de l’étudiant, de l’étudiante ou du groupe évalué. Lorsque le recours à l’intelligence artificielle (IA) n’est pas explicitement autorisé, il est refusé. Lorsque l’IA est autorisée, il convient de mentionner la source.Localized display only
All documents produced for an assessment must be the student's or group's personal work; AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.
Evidence locator: Section: Plagiat, IA et fraude
claim-su-ai-plagiarism-scope · historical_only
2024–25 historic regulation; 2026–27 Faculty of Science M1 distance physics scope distinct.
Keep old plagiarism description historical; do not project newer programme language onto all students or invent sanctions.
Record historyAcademic Integrity 1 reviewed claim
Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules treat unauthorized AI-generated work presented as one's own, or authorized AI use without source mention, as plagiarism.
Reviewed
Scope: 2024–25 historic regulation; 2026–27 Faculty of Science M1 distance physics scope distinct.
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1De même, utiliser l’IA afin de produire des résultats en les donnant pour siens sans y être autorisé, ou l’utiliser en y étant autorisé, mais sans mentionner la source, sera considéré comme relevant du plagiat.Localized display only
Using AI to produce results as one's own without authorization, or using it with authorization but without mentioning the source, is considered plagiarism.
Evidence locator: Section: Plagiat, IA et fraude
Official sources
5 official URLs; 5 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Commission de la formation et de la vie universitaire du conseil academique du 20 juin 2024 - Modalites de controle des connaissances 2024-2025
actesreglementaires.sorbonne-universite.fr
University official source
actesreglementaires.sorbonne-universite.fr
Hash and captured version
Commission de la formation et de la vie universitaire du conseil academique du 20 juin 2024 - Modalites de controle des connaissances 2024-2025 · 2026-05-13T02:29:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
56c3231d216f05a052bd71c531bc03d07da9bc81cef4257a6abed65fcb7e45b8
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Home | SCAI Education
scai-education.sorbonne-universite.fr
University official source
scai-education.sorbonne-universite.fr
Hash and captured version
Home | SCAI Education · 2026-07-15T22:51:43.896Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
08b632649b94b1cf58ad3033ec0c20ed5350e80ea0bac7c731e37df157b1fe1b
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Recommandations d'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle generative dans le cadre de la recherche
sante.sorbonne-universite.fr
University official source
sante.sorbonne-universite.fr
Hash and captured version
Recommandations d'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle generative dans le cadre de la recherche · 2026-05-13T02:30:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
4f480b67eed570a9911ace9fa1a31e5969fa1abaa655584c16057882add2e63e
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Ressources - capsule.sorbonne-universite
capsule.sorbonne-universite.fr
University official source
capsule.sorbonne-universite.fr
Hash and captured version
Ressources - capsule.sorbonne-universite · 2026-05-13T02:31:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
bcae85926c0c31a63907edb74dabcf17aa3edf41666ec347f496f63c3f29210b
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
SORBONNE.AI
scai.sorbonne-universite.fr
University official source
scai.sorbonne-universite.fr
Hash and captured version
SORBONNE.AI · 2026-07-15T22:50:43.896Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
8794fff58a3145d5d21557dbfad6d705116abec431e047b77d8d382f6a2bd458
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Explore
Related university AI policy records
4 records
Record information, JSON & citation
Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.
- Claim review state
- agent_reviewed
- Analysis review state
- machine_candidate
- Record revision
- qs71-90-v6-completeness-r3-20261025
- Dataset release
- public-release-20260924-002
- Correction published
- Student snapshot
- Not published
Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.
- Institution audit PARTIAL. Official raw HTML/PDF originals and full version/context verification remain incomplete.
- Original public records remain unchanged. Excluded records are historical or pending scope review, not current permissions.
- New corrections, tools, student interpretations and snapshots remain unapproved.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
The retained 2024–25 assessment rules are historical. Newer M1 distance-physics material is programme-specific; current general coursework permission remains unresolved.
View evidence →Do I need to disclose AI use?
In Faculty of Health research, document GenAI use when writing scientific documents, including reports, dissertations and theses. This is not a general course citation rule.
View evidence →Can I upload sensitive data?
Faculty of Health research recommendations exclude non-public or unpublished content and personal, confidential or sensitive data from GenAI tools.
View evidence →Which tools can I access?
CAPSULE lists Compilatio Magister+ as a detection resource. SORBONNE.AI/SCAI course listings do not establish generative-assistant or assessment-use permission.
View evidence →What are the examination rules?
No current university-wide exam permission is established here. The old assessment record and programme-specific evidence must be kept distinct.
View evidence →What rules apply to research and publication?
Faculty of Health guidance requires transparent documentation of GenAI use and does not recommend generative tools for translation; translation-only software is distinguished.
View evidence →What counts as academic misconduct?
The Compilatio listing establishes a detection function, not that a score proves misconduct. A current investigation or appeal procedure is not established here.
View evidence →What guidance applies to teaching?
The retained Claims do not establish a general teaching policy on AI-assisted assessment or student-work uploads. Health research advice has a different audience.
View evidence →What security and procurement requirements apply?
Faculty of Health research data restrictions are recorded, but no general procurement approval process or tool-account entitlement is established.
View evidence →