Paris, France Last checked

Université PSL

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Only if the instructor authorises

In programmes PSL operates directly, AI tools may be used only where the instructor authorises them, and their use must then be disclosed. Member institutions (ENS, Dauphine, Mines Paris and others) apply their own regulations; for example the CIENS centre at ENS-PSL allows AI only as occasional help (translation, document exploration, organising work) and bans AI-written text content.

Official source ↗

Exams

Check exam rules

The reviewed PSL sources do not set a general AI rule for examinations beyond anti-fraud measures; follow each programme's exam rules and instructor authorisation. This is an evidence gap, not a permission.

Disclosure

Required when authorised

Where an instructor authorises AI, its use must be disclosed explicitly like any source citation; undisclosed use is treated as plagiarism. Doctoral candidates must include a signed 'Déclaration doctorale d'intégrité scientifique' listing AI tools, tasks, benefits, limits and risks. CIENS requires AI use to be noted in a note or the text.

Official source ↗

Privacy & sensitive data

Protect personal and confidential data

CIENS prohibits giving AI sensitive, protected or confidential information. Dauphine-PSL library guidance advises not sharing personal data with third parties and checking that generated text contains no personal data. No PSL-wide AI data rule was found in the reviewed sources.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

No PSL tool list found

No PSL-wide list of approved or licensed AI tools was found in the reviewed sources. ChatGPT is mentioned only as an example of an AI tool, not as a required or provided service.

Research & publication

Transparent, declared use

Generative AI is not prohibited in PSL doctoral research, but uses must be transparent, declared and critically assessed; the candidate remains fully responsible and member institutions may set stricter rules. Dauphine-PSL library guidance recommends stating the tool, version and context, not treating AI as a co-author, and notes reproducibility risks; these are recommendations at a member institution.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity & procedures

Plagiarism procedure

Failure to disclose AI use is treated and sanctioned as plagiarism. On suspicion, the instructor informs the programme management and a disciplinary procedure may follow, with sanctions up to exclusion (not automatic). At CIENS, undeclared AI use may be treated as academic fraud.

Official source ↗

Teaching & course guidance

Unclear

University-wide teaching frameworks, instructional guidance on AI pedagogical integration, and syllabus design recommendations for faculty are not established in current reviewed public sources.

Security & procurement

Unclear

Central IT security review protocols, vendor assessment criteria, and institutional procurement standards for third-party artificial intelligence tools are not established in current public records.

Before you submit

Do

  • In programmes PSL operates directly, use AI tools only where authorised by the instructor, and cite them like any source reference.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Doctoral candidates: sign the 'Déclaration doctorale d'intégrité scientifique' at the front of the thesis, listing AI tools, tasks and risks.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Check your member institution's or centre's own AI rules (for example the CIENS charter at ENS-PSL).
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • In programmes PSL operates directly, do not leave AI use undisclosed: it is treated as plagiarism and can lead to disciplinary sanctions.
    Requirement in this scope
  • At CIENS, do not use AI to write text content, build your research problem or produce references.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not provide sensitive, protected or confidential information to AI tools (prohibited at CIENS, ENS-PSL), and avoid sharing personal data with public AI services (advised by Paris-Dauphine Library); follow member-institution data guidance.
    Source guidance

AI use questioned?

Université PSL

Université PSL Règlement de la scolarité 2026-2027 (Board, 25 June 2026; applies to programmes PSL operates directly); PSL Charte du doctorat (June 2026); CIENS (ENS-PSL) AI charter; Dauphine-PSL library research-integrity guidance. Member institutions keep their own rules. Institution audit remains PARTIAL.

Investigation & response

Université PSL's Règlement de la scolarité for 2026-2027 (adopted by the Board on 25 June 2026, replacing the June 2025 version with the same AI wording) states that, where an instructor authorises AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, their use must be explicitly disclosed like any source citation, and failure to disclose AI use is treated as plagiarism and sanctioned as such; a disciplinary procedure may follow, with sanctions up to exclusion (not automatic exclusion). The 2026 version applies to programmes operated directly by PSL (such as the Collège Sciences, Humanités et Société and the Paris School of AI); member institutions apply their own regulations, so it does not set course permissions across ENS, Dauphine, Mines Paris and other members.

Original evidence and scope

Université PSL's Règlement de la scolarité for 2026-2027 (adopted by the Board on 25 June 2026, replacing the June 2025 version with the same AI wording) states that, where an instructor authorises AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, their use must be explicitly disclosed like any source citation, and failure to disclose AI use is treated as plagiarism and sanctioned as such; a disciplinary procedure may follow, with sanctions up to exclusion (not automatic exclusion). The 2026 version applies to programmes operated directly by PSL (such as the Collège Sciences, Humanités et Société and the Paris School of AI); member institutions apply their own regulations, so it does not set course permissions across ENS, Dauphine, Mines Paris and other members.

psl-claim-central-ai-disclosure
Le présent règlement s'applique aux formations directement opérées par l'Université PSL (Collège Sciences, Humanités et Société, Paris School of AI, …).

Préambule (CA du 25 juin 2026); physical PDF page 2; lines 6-7 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
Lorsque celui-ci est autorisé par l’enseignante ou l’enseignant, le recours à des outils basés sur l’intelligence artificielle (IA), tels que ChatGPT, doit être signalé explicitement (de la même manière que toute référence ou citation de source). Ne pas signaler l’utilisation de l’intelligence artificielle est considéré comme un acte de plagiat et sera sanctionné comme tel.

Article 3 – Intégrité académique, Plagiat; physical PDF page 3; lines 94-97 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
En cas de soupçon de plagiat, l’enseignante ou l’enseignant doit informer l’équipe de direction et lui communiquer tous les éléments à disposition. Une procédure disciplinaire peut être déclenchée avec une sanction pouvant aller jusqu’à l’exclusion.

Article 3 – Intégrité académique, Plagiat; physical PDF page 3; lines 99-101 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

Université PSL's Règlement de la scolarité for 2026-2027 (adopted by the Board on 25 June 2026, replacing the June 2025 version with the same AI wording) states that, where an instructor authorises AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, their use must be explicitly disclosed like any source citation, and failure to disclose AI use is treated as plagiarism and sanctioned as such; a disciplinary procedure may follow, with sanctions up to exclusion (not automatic exclusion). The 2026 version applies to programmes operated directly by PSL (such as the Collège Sciences, Humanités et Société and the Paris School of AI); member institutions apply their own regulations, so it does not set course permissions across ENS, Dauphine, Mines Paris and other members.

Original evidence and scope

Université PSL's Règlement de la scolarité for 2026-2027 (adopted by the Board on 25 June 2026, replacing the June 2025 version with the same AI wording) states that, where an instructor authorises AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, their use must be explicitly disclosed like any source citation, and failure to disclose AI use is treated as plagiarism and sanctioned as such; a disciplinary procedure may follow, with sanctions up to exclusion (not automatic exclusion). The 2026 version applies to programmes operated directly by PSL (such as the Collège Sciences, Humanités et Société and the Paris School of AI); member institutions apply their own regulations, so it does not set course permissions across ENS, Dauphine, Mines Paris and other members.

psl-claim-central-ai-disclosure
Le présent règlement s'applique aux formations directement opérées par l'Université PSL (Collège Sciences, Humanités et Société, Paris School of AI, …).

Préambule (CA du 25 juin 2026); physical PDF page 2; lines 6-7 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
Lorsque celui-ci est autorisé par l’enseignante ou l’enseignant, le recours à des outils basés sur l’intelligence artificielle (IA), tels que ChatGPT, doit être signalé explicitement (de la même manière que toute référence ou citation de source). Ne pas signaler l’utilisation de l’intelligence artificielle est considéré comme un acte de plagiat et sera sanctionné comme tel.

Article 3 – Intégrité académique, Plagiat; physical PDF page 3; lines 94-97 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗
En cas de soupçon de plagiat, l’enseignante ou l’enseignant doit informer l’équipe de direction et lui communiquer tous les éléments à disposition. Une procédure disciplinaire peut être déclenchée avec une sanction pouvant aller jusqu’à l’exclusion.

Article 3 – Intégrité académique, Plagiat; physical PDF page 3; lines 99-101 of captured PDF text

Official university source ↗

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Disclosure · 3 more topics · Records involved: 7 (5 corrected / adjusted · 2 added)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

7

Official sources

4 official URLs; 4 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Délibération n°28-2026 — Règlement de la scolarité de l'Université PSL (voté par le Conseil d'administration du 25 juin 2026)

static.psl.eu

University official source

Université PSL

Hash and captured version

Délibération n°28-2026 — Règlement de la scolarité de l'Université PSL (voté par le Conseil d'administration du 25 juin 2026) · 2026-10-20T06:15:52Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

806c6f406411153c275d6553aee4e4211a17c10a4e2093489c0b1ffcf2ba56c1

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Intégrité scientifique et IA générative (BU Dauphine-PSL, print view; served as application/pdf)

bu.dauphine.psl.eu

University official source

Bibliothèque universitaire, Université Paris Dauphine-PSL

Hash and captured version

Intégrité scientifique et IA générative (BU Dauphine-PSL, print view; served as application/pdf) · 2026-10-20T05:35:49Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

e681701f7b49b1fb6ffd1e6e97a5137e4d8acd9ee0ab9f37c8b2721125d0bc65

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Délibération n°20-2026 — Charte du doctorat de l'Université PSL (juin 2026)

static.psl.eu

University official source

Université PSL

Hash and captured version

Délibération n°20-2026 — Charte du doctorat de l'Université PSL (juin 2026) · 2026-10-20T06:14:50Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

a48b6e2eb4f8b33d33e5959d648635a0f9176bcbd2cecf268cd853d4d3e9b35a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Charte d'utilisation de l'IA (CIENS, ENS-PSL)

ciens.ens.psl.eu

University official source

Centre interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux stratégiques (CIENS), École normale supérieure - PSL

Hash and captured version

Charte d'utilisation de l'IA (CIENS, ENS-PSL) · 2026-10-20T06:26:43Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

fedc5fe21bcac3153822cbdecb189d9df794a5a934219b69b4f1aa1891c3b6d2

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs25-31-v6-r1-20261020
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

          Current reviewed JSON
          Questions students ask

          Questions students ask

          Can I use AI for my coursework?

          In programmes PSL operates directly, AI tools may be used only where the instructor authorises them, and their use must then be disclosed. Member institutions (ENS, Dauphine, Mines Paris and others) apply their own regulations; for example the CIENS centre at ENS-PSL allows AI only as occasional help (translation, document exploration, organising work) and bans AI-written text content.

          View evidence →
          Do I need to disclose AI use?

          Where an instructor authorises AI, its use must be disclosed explicitly like any source citation; undisclosed use is treated as plagiarism. Doctoral candidates must include a signed 'Déclaration doctorale d'intégrité scientifique' listing AI tools, tasks, benefits, limits and risks. CIENS requires AI use to be noted in a note or the text.

          View evidence →
          Can I upload sensitive data?

          CIENS prohibits giving AI sensitive, protected or confidential information. Dauphine-PSL library guidance advises not sharing personal data with third parties and checking that generated text contains no personal data. No PSL-wide AI data rule was found in the reviewed sources.

          View evidence →
          Which tools can I access?

          No PSL-wide list of approved or licensed AI tools was found in the reviewed sources. ChatGPT is mentioned only as an example of an AI tool, not as a required or provided service.

          View evidence →
          What are the examination rules?

          The reviewed PSL sources do not set a general AI rule for examinations beyond anti-fraud measures; follow each programme's exam rules and instructor authorisation. This is an evidence gap, not a permission.

          View evidence →
          What rules apply to research and publication?

          Generative AI is not prohibited in PSL doctoral research, but uses must be transparent, declared and critically assessed; the candidate remains fully responsible and member institutions may set stricter rules. Dauphine-PSL library guidance recommends stating the tool, version and context, not treating AI as a co-author, and notes reproducibility risks; these are recommendations at a member institution.

          View evidence →
          What counts as academic misconduct?

          Failure to disclose AI use is treated and sanctioned as plagiarism. On suspicion, the instructor informs the programme management and a disciplinary procedure may follow, with sanctions up to exclusion (not automatic). At CIENS, undeclared AI use may be treated as academic fraud.

          View evidence →
          What guidance applies to teaching?

          University-wide teaching frameworks, instructional guidance on AI pedagogical integration, and syllabus design recommendations for faculty are not established in current reviewed public sources.

          View evidence →
          What security and procurement requirements apply?

          Central IT security review protocols, vendor assessment criteria, and institutional procurement standards for third-party artificial intelligence tools are not established in current public records.

          View evidence →
          When was this record checked?

          Record checked:

          Record version →
          Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
          Where can I read the full evidence?

          7 · Full policy evidence

          Full policy evidence →
          Université PSL AI Policy