Policy presence
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Paris, France
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne is listed as QS 2026 rank =257. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne is listed as QS 2026 rank =257. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universite-paris-1-pantheon-sorbonne.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Exams
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ states that presenting as one's own a submitted university assignment that one did not write oneself is fraud, whether the writer is a human third party or an AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: presenting_ai_written_work_as_own_is_fraud
Original evidence
Evidence 1Pour l’université, présenter comme sien un travail que l’on n’a pas rédigé soi-même est une fraude : que le rédacteur soit un tiers humain ou une IA ne change rien.
Localized display only
For the university, presenting work as one's own when one did not write it is fraud, whether written by another person or AI.
Ai Tool Treatment
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne guidance says students may use conversational AI tools in an academic setting, while correcting and completing outputs with their own knowledge, consolidating with academic sources, disclosing AI use, and critically verifying responses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_may_use_ai_with_disclosure_and_verification
Original evidence
Evidence 1Oui, je peux utiliser les outils conversationnels propulsés par l'IA dans un cadre académique mais je fais attention à bien les utiliser. Je corrige, je complète avec mes connaissances ainsi que mes idées et je consolide avec des sources académiques. Quel que soit mon usage de l'IA, je fais preuve d'honnêteté intellectuelle en indiquant mon utilisation de l’IA et j'exerce toujours mon esprit critique en vérifiant ce qu’elle me propose comme réponse.
Localized display only
Students can use AI conversational tools academically, but should correct, complete, cite academic sources, disclose AI use, and verify responses.
Privacy
The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ advises never to entrust personal data, especially sensitive data, to a third party AI service, noting data appropriation risks and that ChatGPT retains submitted information on U.S. servers for an officially stated 30 days.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_submit_personal_or_sensitive_data_to_ai_services
Original evidence
Evidence 1La règle est de ne jamais confier des données personnelles, à plus forte raison sensibles, à un tiers, d’autant plus quand il dépend d’une législation qui n’est pas la nôtre (les serveurs d’OpenAI sont actuellement tous aux États-Unis) et qu’il peut unilatéralement modifier les conditions d’utilisation de ces données.
Localized display only
The FAQ advises never to entrust personal data, especially sensitive data, to third-party services, especially under another legal regime.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
FAQ : l’IA et moi à l’université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
international.pantheonsorbonne.fr
L’IA et moi à l’université
international.pantheonsorbonne.fr
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.