Policy presence
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Paris, France
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: presenting_ai_written_work_as_own_is_fraud
Original evidence
Evidence 1Pour l’université, présenter comme sien un travail que l’on n’a pas rédigé soi-même est une fraude : que le rédacteur soit un tiers humain ou une IA ne change rien.
Localized display only
For the university, presenting work as one's own when one did not write it is fraud, whether written by another person or AI.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: students_may_use_ai_with_disclosure_and_verification
Original evidence
Evidence 1Oui, je peux utiliser les outils conversationnels propulsés par l'IA dans un cadre académique mais je fais attention à bien les utiliser. Je corrige, je complète avec mes connaissances ainsi que mes idées et je consolide avec des sources académiques. Quel que soit mon usage de l'IA, je fais preuve d'honnêteté intellectuelle en indiquant mon utilisation de l’IA et j'exerce toujours mon esprit critique en vérifiant ce qu’elle me propose comme réponse.
Localized display only
Students can use AI conversational tools academically, but should correct, complete, cite academic sources, disclose AI use, and verify responses.
Privacy
Normalized value: do_not_submit_personal_or_sensitive_data_to_ai_services
Original evidence
Evidence 1La règle est de ne jamais confier des données personnelles, à plus forte raison sensibles, à un tiers, d’autant plus quand il dépend d’une législation qui n’est pas la nôtre (les serveurs d’OpenAI sont actuellement tous aux États-Unis) et qu’il peut unilatéralement modifier les conditions d’utilisation de ces données.
Localized display only
The FAQ advises never to entrust personal data, especially sensitive data, to third-party services, especially under another legal regime.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
international.pantheonsorbonne.fr
international.pantheonsorbonne.fr