academic_integrity
The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ states that presenting as one's own a submitted university assignment that one did not write oneself is fraud, whether the writer is a human third party or an AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+6-0
11 # Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ states that presenting as one's own a submitted university assignment that one did not write oneself is fraud, whether the writer is a human third party or an AI.
3+Evidence (fr, 032a3dc17ff2): Pour l’université, présenter comme sien un travail que l’on n’a pas rédigé soi-même est une fraude : que le rédacteur soit un tiers humain ou une IA ne change rien.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne guidance says students may use conversational AI tools in an academic setting, while correcting and completing outputs with their own knowledge, consolidating with academic sources, disclosing AI use, and critically verifying responses.
5+Evidence (fr, 4d9680b6786a): Oui, je peux utiliser les outils conversationnels propulsés par l'IA dans un cadre académique mais je fais attention à bien les utiliser. Je corrige, je complète avec mes connaissances ainsi que mes idées et je consolide avec des sources académiques. Quel que soit mon usage de l'IA, je fais preuve d'honnêteté intellectuelle en indiquant mon utilisation de l’IA et j'exerce toujours mon esprit critique en vérifiant ce qu’elle me propose comme réponse.
6+privacy: The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ advises never to entrust personal data, especially sensitive data, to a third party AI service, noting data appropriation risks and that ChatGPT retains submitted information on U.S. servers for an officially stated 30 days.
7+Evidence (fr, 032a3dc17ff2): La règle est de ne jamais confier des données personnelles, à plus forte raison sensibles, à un tiers, d’autant plus quand il dépend d’une législation qui n’est pas la nôtre (les serveurs d’OpenAI sont actuellement tous aux États-Unis) et qu’il peut unilatéralement modifier les conditions d’utilisation de ces données.
Claim changes
3 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne guidance says students may use conversational AI tools in an academic setting, while correcting and completing outputs with their own knowledge, consolidating with academic sources, disclosing AI use, and critically verifying responses.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ advises never to entrust personal data, especially sensitive data, to a third party AI service, noting data appropriation risks and that ChatGPT retains submitted information on U.S. servers for an officially stated 30 days.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
FAQ : l’IA et moi à l’université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
official_pdf checked May 16, 2026
L’IA et moi à l’université
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026