Policy presence
Sciences Po has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Paris, France
Sciences Po
Sciences Po is listed as QS 2026 rank =367. Sciences Po has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Sciences Po is listed as QS 2026 rank =367. Sciences Po has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Sciences Po as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/sciences-po.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Sciences Po has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Sciences Po has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Sciences Po has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Sciences Po has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Sciences Po has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Sciences Po has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
Sciences Po has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Sciences Po has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Sciences Po's academic integrity explainer says students must be transparent about generative AI use by indicating the solution name and version, specifying the type of use, reproducing the script, and checking generated answers because hallucinations, errors, and plagiarism are attributed to them.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: academic integrity requires transparency and verification for generative AI use
Original evidence
Evidence 1en étant transparents concernant le recours aux IAG : en indiquant le nom et la version de la solution utilisée, en précisant le type d’usage de l’IAG (qui doit rester limité), en reproduisant le script. Ils doivent impérativement vérifier la qualité de la réponse générée par l’IAG
Localized display only
The integrity page says students must be transparent about generative AI use, identify the tool and version, specify the type of limited use, reproduce the script, and verify generated answers.
Academic Integrity
Where Sciences Po assessment formats explicitly integrate AI use, the AI doctrine says students must document that use by detailing their work steps, naming the tools used, and adopting a reflective approach.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students must document AI use when assessment formats explicitly integrate AI
Original evidence
Evidence 1Les étudiants doivent alors documenter cet usage en détaillant les étapes de leur travail, en indiquant les outils mobilisés et en adoptant une démarche réflexive.
Localized display only
When AI is explicitly integrated into an assessment format, students must document the use by detailing work steps, tools used, and a reflective approach.
Academic Integrity
Sciences Po's AI doctrine says the institution does not seek either to prohibit or ignore AI use in student academic productions, but to frame it while training students in academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai use in student productions is framed rather than categorically prohibited
Original evidence
Evidence 1Sciences Po en prend acte et adopte une approche lucide: il ne s’agit ni de l'interdire ni de l’ignorer, mais de l’encadrer tout en formant les étudiants aux impératifs de l'intégrité académique.
Localized display only
Sciences Po says AI use in student academic productions should be framed, not categorically prohibited or ignored, while students are trained in academic integrity.
Ai Tool Treatment
Sciences Po's 2025 AI doctrine states that the institution's mission includes helping students, teachers, researchers, and staff appropriate AI tools while reinforcing discernment, creativity, intellectual depth, critical thinking, and multidisciplinary understanding for reasoned use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai doctrine frames AI appropriation and reasoned use across the Sciences Po community
Original evidence
Evidence 1la mission est double : assurer l’appropriation de ces outils par l’ensemble de notre communauté – étudiants, enseignants, chercheurs et salariés – afin d’en exploiter le potentiel et renforcer l’exigence de discernement, de créativité, d'approfondissement, de pensée critique et de compréhension pluridisciplinaire
Localized display only
The doctrine says Sciences Po's mission includes helping the whole community appropriate AI tools while reinforcing discernment, creativity, critical thinking, and multidisciplinary understanding.
Teaching
Sciences Po's official teachers' resources page says its framework for generative AI use by teachers will apply from the September 2026 intake and covers guiding principles, transparency toward students, and AI integration in teaching activities and assessments.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teacher generative AI framework applies from September 2026 and covers transparency and assessment integration
Original evidence
Evidence 1Le Cadre d’usage des IA génératives par les enseignants (PDF) s’appliquera à compter de la rentrée de septembre 2026. Il précise notamment : les principes directeurs qui doivent guider l’usage de l’IA ; les attendus en matière de transparence vis-à-vis des étudiants ; les modalités d’intégration de l’IA dans les activités pédagogiques et les évaluations.
Localized display only
The teachers' resources page says the teacher generative-AI framework applies from September 2026 and covers guiding principles, transparency toward students, and integration in activities and assessments.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Guides pédagogiques
sciencespo.fr
Intégrité scientifique, intégrité académique : tout ce qu'il faut savoir
sciencespo.fr
La doctrine de Sciences Po sur l'intelligence artificielle
sciencespo.fr
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.