University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Sciences Po

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims5Sources3
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Sciences Po currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Sciences Po current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Sciences Po AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Sciences Po's academic integrity explainer says students must be transparent about generative AI use by indicating the solution name and version, specifying the type of use, reproducing the script, and checking generated answers because hallucinations, errors, and plagiarism are attributed to them.
3+Evidence (fr, 8fa7bac624eb): en étant transparents concernant le recours aux IAG : en indiquant le nom et la version de la solution utilisée, en précisant le type d’usage de l’IAG (qui doit rester limité), en reproduisant le script. Ils doivent impérativement vérifier la qualité de la réponse générée par l’IAG
4+academic_integrity: Where Sciences Po assessment formats explicitly integrate AI use, the AI doctrine says students must document that use by detailing their work steps, naming the tools used, and adopting a reflective approach.
5+Evidence (fr, d62b68cea0d0): Les étudiants doivent alors documenter cet usage en détaillant les étapes de leur travail, en indiquant les outils mobilisés et en adoptant une démarche réflexive.
6+academic_integrity: Sciences Po's AI doctrine says the institution does not seek either to prohibit or ignore AI use in student academic productions, but to frame it while training students in academic integrity.
7+Evidence (fr, d62b68cea0d0): Sciences Po en prend acte et adopte une approche lucide: il ne s’agit ni de l'interdire ni de l’ignorer, mais de l’encadrer tout en formant les étudiants aux impératifs de l'intégrité académique.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Sciences Po's 2025 AI doctrine states that the institution's mission includes helping students, teachers, researchers, and staff appropriate AI tools while reinforcing discernment, creativity, intellectual depth, critical thinking, and multidisciplinary understanding for reasoned use.
9+Evidence (fr, d62b68cea0d0): la mission est double : assurer l’appropriation de ces outils par l’ensemble de notre communauté – étudiants, enseignants, chercheurs et salariés – afin d’en exploiter le potentiel et renforcer l’exigence de discernement, de créativité, d'approfondissement, de pensée critique et de compréhension pluridisciplinaire
10+teaching: Sciences Po's official teachers' resources page says its framework for generative AI use by teachers will apply from the September 2026 intake and covers guiding principles, transparency toward students, and AI integration in teaching activities and assessments.
11+Evidence (fr, 639d52063480): Le Cadre d’usage des IA génératives par les enseignants (PDF) s’appliquera à compter de la rentrée de septembre 2026. Il précise notamment : les principes directeurs qui doivent guider l’usage de l’IA ; les attendus en matière de transparence vis-à-vis des étudiants ; les modalités d’intégration de l’IA dans les activités pédagogiques et les évaluations.

Claim changes

5 claim records

teaching

Sciences Po's official teachers' resources page says its framework for generative AI use by teachers will apply from the September 2026 intake and covers guiding principles, transparency toward students, and AI integration in teaching activities and assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

Sciences Po's academic integrity explainer says students must be transparent about generative AI use by indicating the solution name and version, specifying the type of use, reproducing the script, and checking generated answers because hallucinations, errors, and plagiarism are attributed to them.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

Where Sciences Po assessment formats explicitly integrate AI use, the AI doctrine says students must document that use by detailing their work steps, naming the tools used, and adopting a reflective approach.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

Sciences Po's AI doctrine says the institution does not seek either to prohibit or ignore AI use in student academic productions, but to frame it while training students in academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesfr

ai_tool_treatment

Sciences Po's 2025 AI doctrine states that the institution's mission includes helping students, teachers, researchers, and staff appropriate AI tools while reinforcing discernment, creativity, intellectual depth, critical thinking, and multidisciplinary understanding for reasoned use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesfr

Source snapshots

3 source attributions