University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Sorbonne University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 13, 2026Last changedMay 13, 2026Claims6Sources3
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Sorbonne University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Sorbonne University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # Sorbonne University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.
3+Evidence (fr, 56c3231d216f): L’ensemble des documents produits dans le cadre d’une évaluation doit être l’œuvre personnelle de l’étudiant, de l’étudiante ou du groupe évalué. Lorsque le recours à l’intelligence artificielle (IA) n’est pas explicitement autorisé, il est refusé. Lorsque l’IA est autorisée, il convient de mentionner la source.
4+academic_integrity: Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules treat unauthorized AI-generated work presented as one's own, or authorized AI use without source mention, as plagiarism.
5+Evidence (fr, 56c3231d216f): De même, utiliser l’IA afin de produire des résultats en les donnant pour siens sans y être autorisé, ou l’utiliser en y étant autorisé, mais sans mentionner la source, sera considéré comme relevant du plagiat.
6+privacy: Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say not to transmit non-public or unpublished content, personal data, confidential data, or sensitive data to a generative AI tool.
7+Evidence (fr, 4f480b67eed5): Ne pas transmettre à un outil d’IA générative de contenu qui ne soit pas public ou déjà publié. Ne pas soumettre à un outil d’IA générative des données personnelles, confidentielles ou sensibles.
8+research: Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say users should be transparent about generative AI use in research projects and document use when writing scientific documents such as protocols, analysis plans, reports, articles, presentations, dissertations, or theses.
9+Evidence (fr, 4f480b67eed5): Faire preuve de transparence sur l’utilisation d’outils IA générative dans les projets de recherche. Lors de la rédaction de documents scientifiques, tels qu’un protocole de recherche, un plan d’analyse, un rapport, un article, une présentation en congrès, un mémoire, ou une thèse, vous devez documenter l’utilisation de ces outils.
10+research: Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations distinguish translation-only software such as DeepL or Linguee from generative AI tools and say using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for translation is not recommended.
11+Evidence (fr, 4f480b67eed5): Les logiciels à des fins exclusives de traduction (tels que DeePL ou Linguee) ne sont pas des outils d’IA générative et ne sont donc pas concernés par ces recommandations. À l’opposé, utiliser des outils d’IA générative (tel que ChatGPT) pour la traduction n’est pas recommandé.
12+ai_tool_treatment: Sorbonne University's CAPSULE resources page lists Compilatio Magister+ with CAS SU access as a resource for plagiarism prevention and detection of AI-generated content.
13+Evidence (fr, bcae85926c0c): Compilatio Magister + La prévention et la détection du plagiat et des contenus générés par des IA. La solution Compilatio Magister + regroupe un logiciel détecteur de similitudes des ressources pédagogiques, de plagiat syntaxique et de contenus générés par des IA

Claim changes

6 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

Sorbonne University's CAPSULE resources page lists Compilatio Magister+ with CAS SU access as a resource for plagiarism prevention and detection of AI-generated content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesfr

research

Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations distinguish translation-only software such as DeepL or Linguee from generative AI tools and say using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for translation is not recommended.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesfr

research

Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say users should be transparent about generative AI use in research projects and document use when writing scientific documents such as protocols, analysis plans, reports, articles, presentations, dissertations, or theses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesfr

privacy

Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say not to transmit non-public or unpublished content, personal data, confidential data, or sensitive data to a generative AI tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules treat unauthorized AI-generated work presented as one's own, or authorized AI use without source mention, as plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesfr

Source snapshots

3 source attributions