Coventry, United Kingdom

The University of Warwick

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

10 reviewed claims

Appels d'offres

Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy says all new uses of AI tools, products, or services must go through appropriate procurement processes, regardless of cost.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%

Valeur normalisée: New AI tool uses require appropriate procurement processes

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Regardless of costs, all new uses of AI tools and services/products or services, must go through appropriate procurement processes.

Affichage localisé only

New AI tool or service uses must go through appropriate procurement processes regardless of cost.

Academic Integrity

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students are required to state whether AI was used in the submission process and explain why, where, and how it was used.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: Students must disclose AI use when used in submissions

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
You will be required to state if any AI has been used as part of the submission procedure. If you use an AI, you must set out why, where and how you have done so.

Affichage localisé only

Students must state AI use and explain why, where, and how it was used.

Security Review

Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy covers everyone with a contractual or implied relationship with the University and all information processed by the University.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: AI information compliance policy applies to members and university-processed information

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The policy covers everyone who has a contractual (formal or informal/implied) relationship with the University, including employees, students, visiting academics, and consultants. The policy covers all information processed by the University, regardless of ownership or format.

Affichage localisé only

The AI information compliance policy applies to covered University members and University-processed information.

Confidentialité

Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy says certain data, including personal or confidential material, University intellectual property, and some copyrighted or third-party data, must not be put into AI software without prior approval.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: Restricted data must not be entered into AI software without prior approval

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Certain types of data must never be put into any AI software, without prior approval from IDG or the Research Ethics Committee. These include: Passwords and usernames. Personally identifiable information (PII) or other sensitive or confidential material. Any data related to University Intellectual Property.

Affichage localisé only

Restricted data types must not be put into AI software without prior approval.

Academic Integrity

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students may use AI only within requirements set out in assessment briefs and course handbooks, which may restrict or prohibit AI use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: Student AI use depends on assessment and course requirements

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The general position is that you can use Artificial Intelligence (AI) but must follow any requirements set out in assessments and course handbooks. Those requirements may restrict or prohibit the use of AI.

Affichage localisé only

Student AI use is conditional on assessment and course requirements.

Recherche

Warwick's AI in research guidance says its principles apply to all researchers and researchers must consider AI-related research risks including integrity, information security, and accountability risks.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: AI research guidance applies to all researchers and risk categories

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The principles set out in this guidance apply to all researchers as previously defined. Researchers must consider all risks that may be relevant to their research that arise from AI.

Affichage localisé only

Warwick AI research guidance applies to all researchers and requires consideration of AI-related research risks.

Confidentialité

Warwick's student-facing guidance tells students not to enter personal or confidential data into AI tools unless they understand what will happen to the data, and recommends Copilot chat with a Warwick account for that kind of data.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%

Valeur normalisée: Student AI privacy guidance directs caution and recommends Warwick-authenticated Copilot chat

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Do not input any personal or confidential data into any AI tools, unless you fully understand what will happen to that data. The university recommends using Co-Pilot chat for this kind of data - when logged in with your Warwick account.

Affichage localisé only

Students are told not to enter personal or confidential data into AI without understanding data handling.

Recherche

Warwick's AI in research guidance says researchers are responsible for misconduct-type practices involving AI, including improper handling of information or use of another person's ideas, even if such practices occur inadvertently through an AI tool.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%

Valeur normalisée: Researchers remain responsible for AI-enabled research misconduct risks

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Misconduct in research includes: the fabrication or falsification of research data; improper handling of information on individuals collected during research; or the use of another person's ideas, work or research data without appropriate acknowledgement. Researchers are responsible for any such practices, even if they occur inadvertently through the use of an AI tool.

Affichage localisé only

The research guidance keeps researchers responsible for AI-enabled misconduct-type practices.

Enseignement

Warwick's assessment-design guidance says generative AI use in student submissions needs thoughtful support so responsible use and clear demonstration of human achievement are maintained.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%

Valeur normalisée: Assessment design guidance calls for supported responsible AI use

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
use of generative AI technologies to produce text and other media as part of student submissions ... needs to be thoughtfully supported to ensure responsible use and clear demonstration of human achievements.

Affichage localisé only

Assessment guidance says AI use in submissions needs support for responsible use and clear human achievement.

Ai Tool Treatment

Warwick's responsible-use guidance frames responsible AI use as honest, ethical, transparent, human-accountable, safe, secure, and attentive to bias, fairness, inclusivity, and accessibility.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: Responsible AI use principles emphasize human accountability, transparency, safety, and fairness

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Responsible use includes ... using AI with honesty, in ethical and defensible ways, with human responsibility taken for the outcomes; being transparent about AI use; making concerted efforts to maximise safe and secure use; using AI in ways that mitigate bias and promote fairness, inclusivity and accessibility.

Affichage localisé only

Responsible AI use is framed around honesty, human responsibility, transparency, safety, security, fairness, inclusivity, and accessibility.

Source record

Sources officielles

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance96%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "The University of Warwick AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 12, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/the-university-of-warwick

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert