University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
語言
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Cambridge, United States 上次查核時間

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

獨立 · 開放存取 · 非官方大學頁面

您想檢查什麼？

搜尋大學
我可以在課程作業中使用 AI 嗎？不明確我需要揭露 AI 的使用嗎？建議我可以上傳敏感資料嗎？受限我可以存取哪些工具？有條件
在 ChatGPT 中使用 ↗提交前建議與注意事項紀錄更新 ↓

依主題探索目前紀錄

課程作業

不明確

評量許可取決於個別課程的具體政策。該學院指引並未確立普遍的課程作業許可或禁令。

官方來源 ↗

考試

已審閱的來源未提及

檢視的記錄未確立通用的考試許可或禁令。請遵循實際考試說明；工具取用權限不等於考試許可。

披露

建議

麻省理工學院圖書館（MIT Libraries）提供引用與致謝指引。適用的課堂與發表要求可能有所不同；此處未確立通用的強制揭露規則。

官方來源 ↗

隱私與敏感資料

受限

公開的生成式AI不得接收中風險MIT資料。任何生成式AI工具均不得接收高風險MIT資料；對於低風險MIT資料，不建議使用公開工具。

官方來源 ↗

核准的工具

有條件

MIT 授權工具設有資格及資料條件。其機構批准與課程或評量許可是分開的。

官方來源 ↗

研究與發表

不明確

委員會建議提供論文 AI 使用聲明；適用的 COUHES 申請有強制性的 Data Card 和同意要求。這些不同的適用範圍絕不能合併為單一普遍的研究規則。

官方來源 ↗
更多已審閱的紀錄主題

學術誠信

不明確

委員會說明了 COD 偵測證據的限制；一般的 COD 退件條件並非針對 AI 的處分。這些來源未能確立任何自動化的 AI 處分。

官方來源 ↗

教學指引

建議

鼓勵授課教師陳述明確的課程政策。TLL 強烈建議不要使用 AI 偵測工具；此為指引而非全校性偵測工具禁令。

官方來源 ↗

安全與採購

必填

採購新的 GenAI 工具需要經過 VPF 採購程序。在使用或購買不在 IS&T 清單上的工具前，請先申請評估。

官方來源 ↗

提交前

應做事項

  • 使用 AI 前，請先查閱本課程的政策。
    本站建議
  • 撰寫學術文章時，應註明 AI 的協助，並核實其輸出內容。
    來源指引
  • 請查核資料風險等級及確切的授權服務。
    本站建議

請勿

  • 請勿將 MIT 高風險資訊輸入任何生成式 AI 工具。
    本範圍要求
  • 不得將中度風險（Medium Risk）的 MIT 資料輸入公開的生成式 AI 工具中。
    本範圍要求
  • 不得僅憑 AI 偵測器的結果視為證明。
    本站建議
AI 使用受到質疑？調查、可能結果與申訴

AI 使用受到質疑？

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

請針對每項所引規定，查閱其適用的課程、學術單位、活動及例外情況。網站上的建議並不構成大學的義務。

調查與回應

MIT 2026年8月13日的委員會報告指出，COD 認為單憑 AI 偵測器輸出結果不足以構成 AI 相關學術誠信案件。此內容記錄了委員會對 COD 實務的描述，而非對偵測器的全面禁令。

原始證據與範圍

MIT 2026年8月13日的委員會報告指出，COD 認為單憑 AI 偵測器輸出結果不足以構成 AI 相關學術誠信案件。此內容記錄了委員會對 COD 實務的描述，而非對偵測器的全面禁令。

clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-detector-output-not-sufficient
the COD itself does not consider AI detector output alone sufficient.

PDF actual page 19 (printed page 17), §3.1.9, Preparing our disciplinary system; normalized text lines 38-38

大學官方來源 ↗

需要無障礙協助以參與COD程序的學生，應洽詢身心障礙與無障礙服務處。這是一般紀律程序資源，並非AI專屬的處分。

原始證據與範圍

需要無障礙協助以參與COD程序的學生，應洽詢身心障礙與無障礙服務處。這是一般紀律程序資源，並非AI專屬的處分。

clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-cod-disability-accommodations
If you have a disability and need an accommodation to participate in any part of the COD process, please contact Disability and Access Services

Student Disability and Access Services; normalized text lines 25-26

大學官方來源 ↗

COD 鼓勵遭受不當行為或正回應違反政策指控的 MIT 學生，透過 Mental Health and Counseling、Alcohol and Other Drug Services、Violence Prevention and Response 及 Chaplains 等資源尋求個人支援。

原始證據與範圍

COD 鼓勵遭受不當行為或正回應違反政策指控的 MIT 學生，透過 Mental Health and Counseling、Alcohol and Other Drug Services、Violence Prevention and Response 及 Chaplains 等資源尋求個人支援。

mit-fact-11

Committee on Discipline；紀律程序中的受害者與答辯人；

Personal Support The COD recognizes that it can often be difficult to find yourself the victim of misconduct or responding to an allegation that you violated MIT policy. The COD encourages you to seek and receive personal support during this process. Resources at MIT for this include: Mental Health and Counseling Alcohol and Other Drug Services Violence Prevention and Response Chaplains

Published supplemental locator: lines 29–34

大學官方來源 ↗

可能的結果

停學後獲准重返 MIT，並不保證能回到原來的系所、學位課程、實驗室小組或相關職位。這是一般的 COD 制裁條件，並非針對 AI 的處罰。

原始證據與範圍

停學後獲准重返 MIT，並不保證能回到原來的系所、學位課程、實驗室小組或相關職位。這是一般的 COD 制裁條件，並非針對 AI 的處罰。

clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-suspension-return-limits
Students allowed to return to the Institute after being suspended are not guaranteed to be able to return to the department, specific degree program, lab group, or any related position that they were in prior to their suspension.

§XI.D, paragraph after permission to return; normalized text lines 32-32

大學官方來源 ↗

未完成或未遵守 COD 制裁，可能導致註冊受限、制裁修訂或進一步紀律處分，具體由主席決定。

原始證據與範圍

未完成或未遵守 COD 制裁，可能導致註冊受限、制裁修訂或進一步紀律處分，具體由主席決定。

mit-fact-05

Committee on Discipline；被指定須接受制裁的答辯人；

Respondents are required to complete and/or comply with COD sanctions. Failure to complete or comply with sanctions may result in an enrollment hold, revision of the sanction, or further disciplinary action, as determined by the Chair. The Chair may consult with other COD members as needed if revising any sanction or taking further disciplinary action.

Published supplemental locator: lines 35–35

大學官方來源 ↗

審核與申訴

在聽證、委員會會議或制裁小組作出決定後，如決定為停學（包括暫緩執行的停學）、開除、撤銷學位、暫停或撤銷對學生團體的認可，或終止對學生組織住所的核准，答辯人可向 Chancellor 提出上訴；除此之外，COD 的決定均為最終決定，除非另有明確規定。

原始證據與範圍

在聽證、委員會會議或制裁小組作出決定後，如決定為停學（包括暫緩執行的停學）、開除、撤銷學位、暫停或撤銷對學生團體的認可，或終止對學生組織住所的核准，答辯人可向 Chancellor 提出上訴；除此之外，COD 的決定均為最終決定，除非另有明確規定。

mit-fact-01

Committee on Discipline；學生與學生組織；答辯人就特定嚴重制裁提出上訴。僅限列明的嚴重制裁；Section XIII 特別規則包括申訴人/TitleIX 及其他與性不當行為相關的途徑；這不表示全面否定上訴權。

符合資格的 COD 上訴：自收到決定通知書之日起五個工作日內，以書面向 OSCCS 提出上訴。僅可對所列決定提出上訴；Section XIII 設有特別規則。

All appeals must be submitted in writing to the OSCCS staff by the appealing party (usually the respondent; see Section XIII for situations when the complainant may appeal) within five business days of the date the appealing party received the letter advising them of the decision of the COD.
大學官方來源 ↗
A decision after a hearing, panel meeting, or sanctioning panel to suspend (including a suspension held in abeyance) or expel a student, revoke a degree, suspend (including a suspension held in abeyance) or revoke recognition of a student group, or terminate approval of a student organization residence may be appealed by the respondent to the Chancellor. In all other cases, the COD decision is final, unless otherwise specifically noted (see Section XIII for special rules regarding appeals in cases involving sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, intimate partner violence, stalking, and Title IX Sexual Harassment). All appeals must be submitted in writing to the OSCCS staff by the appealing party (usually the respondent; see Section XIII for situations when the complainant may appeal) within five business days of the date the appealing party received the letter advising them of the decision of the COD.

Published supplemental locator: lines 35–36

大學官方來源 ↗

依據已記錄的 Rules 可提出的 COD 上訴，列有四項一般理由：作出決定時無法取得的重要相關資訊；對程序的重大偏離且嚴重影響公平性；與證據有重大出入的重要認定；或制裁與適當範圍有重大差異。可上訴的範圍僅限列明的嚴重決定；其他決定均為最終決定，除非另有明確規定。性不當行為/TitleIX 特別規則包括其他或經修改的理由。

原始證據與範圍

依據已記錄的 Rules 可提出的 COD 上訴，列有四項一般理由：作出決定時無法取得的重要相關資訊；對程序的重大偏離且嚴重影響公平性；與證據有重大出入的重要認定；或制裁與適當範圍有重大差異。可上訴的範圍僅限列明的嚴重決定；其他決定均為最終決定，除非另有明確規定。性不當行為/TitleIX 特別規則包括其他或經修改的理由。

mit-fact-02

MIT Committee on Discipline；學生與學生組織；已記錄的 COD 上訴理由；上訴範圍及是否可上訴受 RulesXII 和特別規定限制，並非每項 COD 決定均有上訴權。

A. Appeals may only be made on one or more of the following grounds: there exists substantive and relevant information that was not available at the time of the decision a. In cases involving complaints of Title IX Sexual Harassment, this includes new evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal was made that could affect the outcome of the matter. there was a substantial departure from the COD rules and procedures that significantly affected the fairness of the process;

Published supplemental locator: lines 38–41

大學官方來源 ↗
a material finding that formed a basis for the COD’s decision was substantially against the weight of the evidence that was before the COD when it made the decision; and/or the sanction is at significant variance with the range of sanctions appropriate in the situation.

Published supplemental locator: lines 43–44

大學官方來源 ↗
XII. Appeals A decision after a hearing, panel meeting, or sanctioning panel to suspend (including a suspension held in abeyance) or expel a student, revoke a degree, suspend (including a suspension held in abeyance) or revoke recognition of a student group, or terminate approval of a student organization residence may be appealed by the respondent to the Chancellor. In all other cases, the COD decision is final, unless otherwise specifically noted (see Section XIII for special rules regarding appeals in cases involving sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, intimate partner violence, stalking, and Title IX Sexual Harassment). All appeals must be submitted in writing to the OSCCS staff by the appealing party (usually the respondent; see Section XIII for situations when the complainant may appeal) within five business days of the date the appealing party received the letter advising them of the decision of the COD. In the event IDHR dismisses a complaint of Title IX Sexual Harassment following an initial assessment, the dismissal may be appealed by either party in accordance with the processes established by IDHR.

Published supplemental locator: lines 34–37

大學官方來源 ↗
In cases involving complaints of Title IX Sexual Harassment, a party may also appeal on the additional ground that the Title IX Coordinator, the investigator(s), or the decision-maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or the individual complainant or respondent that affected the outcome of the matter. B .The Chancellor makes a decision based upon the written appeal(s) providing the ground(s) on which the party is relying for appeal, and as much of the record of the COD hearing or sanctioning panel of the case as the Chancellor determines it is appropriate to consider. C. The Chancellor will consult with the Chair on all appeals. The Chancellor may also confer with other participants in the hearing or sanctioning panel and, in sexual misconduct cases, with the Title IX Coordinator and/or the investigator(s). D. Before modifying or overruling a decision of the COD, the Chancellor will meet with available members of the COD who decided the case and will make a final decision after consulting with them. E. The final decision will be communicated in writing to the same people who received written notice of the COD decision (including simultaneously to both the complainant and the respondent in all cases involving complaints of sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, intimate partner violence, stalking, and Title IX Sexual Harassment), and to any other officials of MIT who need to be aware of it in order to permit them to fulfill their professional responsibilities. When it is reasonable, a member of the OSCCS staff shall meet with the parties regarding any appeal decision. F. This appellate decision by the Chancellor is final.

Published supplemental locator: lines 45–50

大學官方來源 ↗
H. No appeal is available for the decision of (i) the COD to resolve a complaint, either in whole or in part, by making recommendations to MIT Senior Leadership, or (ii) MIT Senior Leadership to accept, reject, or modify a recommendation of the COD under Section XI.L.

Published supplemental locator: lines 52–52

大學官方來源 ↗

AI工具與存取

  • Open AI ChatGPT機構存取／授權適用條件

    我們建議透過 Parley 存取 OpenAI 模型，或使用您的 MIT 電子郵件登入 ChatGPT

  • Microsoft Copilot機構存取／授權在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    使用您的 MIT Kerberos 帳號透過 Touchstone 存取 Copilot

  • Microsoft Copilot for M365機構存取／授權適用條件

    請透過 IS&T ServiceNow 入口網站申請帳號

  • Google Gemini機構存取／授權在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    使用您的 MIT Kerberos 帳號透過 Touchstone 存取 Gemini

  • Google NotebookLM機構存取／授權在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    透過 Touchstone 使用您的 MIT Kerberos 帳號存取 NotebookLM

  • Adobe Firefly機構存取／授權在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    MIT 的 Adobe Creative Cloud 授權

  • AWS Sagemaker機構存取／授權適用條件

    透過 IS&T 的 MIT Cloud Accounts 計畫註冊 AWS 帳戶。

  • Azure OpenAI機構存取／授權適用條件

    透過 IS&T 的 MIT Cloud Accounts 計畫註冊 Azure 帳戶。

  • Google Vertex機構存取／授權適用條件

    透過 IS&T 的 MIT 雲端帳戶計畫註冊 GCP 帳戶

  • Parley大學託管服務在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    Parley 提供給所有教職員和學生使用

  • Salesforce Einstein機構存取／授權適用條件

    請洽 IS&T 的 Salesforce 授權窗口

  • Zoom AI Companion機構存取／授權在來源範圍內記錄為允許

    透過 Touchstone 登入麻省理工學院的 Zoom 入口網站以啟用功能

  • AWS Bedrock機構存取／授權適用條件

    透過 IS&T 的 MIT Cloud Accounts 計畫註冊 AWS 帳戶。

紀錄更新最近90天 · 已記錄的更新：3

此為本網站已審查紀錄的更新，並不代表大學已變更其政策。

  1. 頁面更新

    其他紀錄 · 頁面更新

    檢視修訂版本

    正在載入修訂版本…

  2. 已保留／已移出目前結論

    Source Status · Records involved: 2 (2 held)

    檢視修訂版本

    正在載入修訂版本…

  3. 新增紀錄 · 網站更正

    學術誠信 · 教學 · 另有 7 個主題 · Records involved: 28 (21 corrected / adjusted · 7 added)

    檢視修訂版本

    正在載入修訂版本…

檢視的記錄

已審查的聲明

26 reviewed claims

暫緩結論與歷史證據 (2)

這些原始紀錄及先前審核狀態僅為追溯來源而保留，不代表目前的許可、義務或具體期限。

Historical IS&T guidance captured on May 6, 2026: MIT prohibits the use of generative AI for purposes that may require in-depth risk assessments without prior consultation with ai-guidance@mit.edu. Such purposes include recruitment and hiring of employees, evaluating student academic performance, making investment decisions, and complaint and dispute resolution. This specific provision is not reproduced on the current guidance page; its current applicability has not been confirmed.

目前狀態：暫緩；歷史審核狀態: needs_review

clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-risk-assessment-uses

Do not use generative AI for purposes that may require in-depth risk assessments without contacting ai-guidance@mit.edu. Examples include: recruitment and hiring of employees, evaluating student academic performance, making investment decisions, and complaint and dispute resolution.

Historical IS&T guidance captured on May 6, 2026: MIT departments, labs, centers, and institutes (DLCIs) already using a generative AI tool or service must ensure that the tool complies with all Institute policies and Information Protection guidelines, and must contact ai-guidance@mit.edu for consultation or assessment if needed. This specific provision is not reproduced on the current guidance page; its current applicability has not been confirmed.

目前狀態：暫緩；歷史審核狀態: needs_review

clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-existing-tool-review

If an MIT DLCI is already using a generative AI tool or service, ensure that the tool complies with all Institute policies and Information Protection guidelines. Contact ai-guidance@mit.edu if you have a need for a consultation or assessment.

來源紀錄

官方來源

11 sources

10 個官方網址；11 項來源出處及其擷取版本已保留。

Guidance for use of Generative AI tools | Information Systems & Technology

ist.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

Guidance for use of Generative AI tools | Information Systems & Technology · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3d3eb666df03eb643e7bb548af9efb03f348e115bfa969a8450ac1a1a95030d2

Guidance for use of Generative AI tools · 2026-05-06T00:57:37.427Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

9f5d98b57ae0a98780b717171db014845705949710b3e8247db979042e50878d

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence – The White House

www.whitehouse.gov

外部政府參考資料

The White House

雜湊值與擷取版本

Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence – The White House · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

9f8e1d4f0b9fbfa842fb712b41dc7ce047f1fdcea55be22fa2dda3fda4d4d3f1

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Generative AI tools available at MIT | Information Systems & Technology

ist.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

Generative AI tools available at MIT | Information Systems & Technology · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

ac43a70663827e05c7df5abac42e811f08e89baa4140ad7598118a323664652c

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Home - Citing AI tools - LibGuides at MIT Libraries

libguides.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

Home - Citing AI tools - LibGuides at MIT Libraries · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

1c23576c5204015c0f4de8c0450b13aa0b80b67a1281f7b408d887a6c0b4fd05

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Communications from the Chair | MIT Faculty Governance

facultygovernance.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

Communications from the Chair | MIT Faculty Governance · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

c68938b928504a4644936cba95a8acbce17912fc3fd5d1bccb8a998bd6987cc2

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Report of MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use, August 13, 2026

sites.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

Report of MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use, August 13, 2026 · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

db443298d69a4153dfeb2a52d07c0c4c18377330d7084a2811cbd552ef5311f5

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Generative AI & Your Course – Teaching + Learning Lab

tll.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

Generative AI & Your Course – Teaching + Learning Lab · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

82cf3a20cb9a2bb0e92c2cb9d3c6667c7f719c47edf74afaedf105fbbba371e3

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Research | Committee on the Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects

couhes.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Research | Committee on the Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

8418b339b3944fca6189fc45b25d3406707b194c068cca04fa8db772ca2d03f6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

Resources and Links – Committee on Discipline

cod.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

Resources and Links – Committee on Discipline · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

bdad20ea10cd5569c84ae51759692213107b2498c852bf2b340bf4ebbd152fda

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗

XI. Sanctions – Committee on Discipline

cod.mit.edu

大學官方來源

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

雜湊值與擷取版本

XI. Sanctions – Committee on Discipline · 2026-10-10T18:52:29.198Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

c33d5269053f582639b0b253d440b51cdf535d94f153e69346fe86b4dc27eebc

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

官方來源 ↗
紀錄資訊、JSON 與引用格式
ReviewReviewedConfidence95%Snapshot statusneeds_reviewSnapshot hash499901a1…JSONPublic JSON

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-audit-fix-20261014
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Pending independent agent review; not an approved snapshot
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Outdated or incorrect policy? Report an issue ↗

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) AI Policy Tracker record. Record revision v6-audit-fix-20261014. Evidence checked 2026-10-10; record correction published 2026-10-14. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/massachusetts-institute-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log

Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.

學生提出的問題

學生提出的問題

我可以在課程作業中使用 AI 嗎？

評量許可取決於個別課程的具體政策。該學院指引並未確立普遍的課程作業許可或禁令。

檢視證據 →
我需要揭露 AI 的使用嗎？

麻省理工學院圖書館（MIT Libraries）提供引用與致謝指引。適用的課堂與發表要求可能有所不同；此處未確立通用的強制揭露規則。

檢視證據 →
我可以上傳敏感資料嗎？

公開的生成式AI不得接收中風險MIT資料。任何生成式AI工具均不得接收高風險MIT資料；對於低風險MIT資料，不建議使用公開工具。

檢視證據 →
我可以存取哪些工具？

MIT 授權工具設有資格及資料條件。其機構批准與課程或評量許可是分開的。

檢視證據 →
考試規則是什麼？

檢視的記錄未確立通用的考試許可或禁令。請遵循實際考試說明；工具取用權限不等於考試許可。

檢視證據 →
研究與出版適用哪些規定？

委員會建議提供論文 AI 使用聲明；適用的 COUHES 申請有強制性的 Data Card 和同意要求。這些不同的適用範圍絕不能合併為單一普遍的研究規則。

檢視證據 →
什麼行為算是學術不端？

委員會說明了 COD 偵測證據的限制；一般的 COD 退件條件並非針對 AI 的處分。這些來源未能確立任何自動化的 AI 處分。

檢視證據 →
哪些指引適用於教學？

鼓勵授課教師陳述明確的課程政策。TLL 強烈建議不要使用 AI 偵測工具；此為指引而非全校性偵測工具禁令。

檢視證據 →
適用哪些安全與採購要求？

採購新的 GenAI 工具需要經過 VPF 採購程序。在使用或購買不在 IS&T 清單上的工具前，請先申請評估。

檢視證據 →
此紀錄何時經過核查？

已核查紀錄:

紀錄版本 →
哪些官方來源支援這些規則？官方來源 →
在哪裡可以閱讀完整證據？

26 · 完整政策證據

完整政策證據 →